![Show Menu](styles/mobile-menu.png)
![Page Background](./../common/page-substrates/page0018.jpg)
Name that Section: Frequently Used Education Code and Title 5 Sections for Community College Districts
©2018 (c) Liebert Cassidy Whitmore
18
Tenure is the rule and temporary employment the exception, such that it is
the employing district’s burden to demonstrate legally and factually that the
employee is temporary.
Service as a substitute on a day-to-day basis by persons employed as a
temporary employee shall not be used for purposes of calculating eligibility
for contract or regular status.
Case Study Regarding Calculating 67%:
Theiler v. Ventura County Community College Dist.
43
The Ventura County Community College District employed Jeff Theiler as a
basketball coach from 2004 to 2008. The District terminated his employment
November 21, 2008 after an investigation revealed that Theiler submitted false
transcripts to obtain eligibility for student athletes, granted favors to non-
resident athletes, and interfered with the investigation. The District claimed that
he was a temporary faculty member, but Theiler argued that he was a contract
employee who was entitled to due process.
Each semester Theiler accepted a written “Offer of Temporary Non–Contract
Academic Employment.” The offer assigned him to teach a basketball course
for two hours a day. No offer exceeded 60% FTE. Under the collective
bargaining agreement, the District compensated its coaches, including Theiler,
for performing ancillary duties with a stipend, paid as a flat amount that did not
depend on the number of hours actually worked.
Theiler argued that although the class was officially scheduled for one hour and
50 minutes, he spent at least two to three hours per session coaching. He also
held one extra basketball practice per week for two to three hours and was
required to supervise students in weight training and “plyometric exercise.” He
also spent at least 1.63 hours a week coaching basketball games. Theiler’s
coaching duties required that he attend meetings with coaching staff, plan
practices, review films, engage in extensive preparation to competently instruct
the class and supervise the men’s basketball program, develop scouting reports
on opponents, recruit high school students to play basketball, supervise work-
study programs, and engage in fundraising for the basketball program. The
District claimed that basketball coaches are paid a stipend to cover the
performance of ancillary duties, which include the additional duties Theiler
described.
The court held that the time Theiler spent in addition to his scheduled class
hours involved ancillary duties. His employment contemplated only two types
of duties: teaching the class during the time scheduled for class and ancillary
duties. Although some of the other duties were similar to teaching, they are not
comparable to classroom instruction. Thus, the hours that Theiler claimed, in