Previous Page  87 / 328 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 87 / 328 Next Page
Page Background

(6) Regular consideration of any necessary action

on

(i) Any bills outstanding six months

(ii) Any bills £50 or more outstanding over three

months

(iii) Any client's debit balance in excess of

£10

(uncos ted)

(iv) Total owed by clients on bills rendered and

also for disbursements unrendered.

(v) The overall financial position by monthly

profit and loss account and balance sheet tied

in with the revenue expense budget.

(vi) Graphical recording of trend and progress of

costs and disbursements.

Counsel's fees may present a problem.

If you

follow the disbursements in advance system the

problem disappears but if not there may be a

dilemma. Some practitioners pay counsel immedi

ately and obtain reimbursements from the client

later on. This is creditable but may be bad business.

On the other hand delay in payment is not good for

solicitor/counsel relations. The solution appears to

be to debit the client's account immediately upon

receipt of counsel's docket and send an interim

disbursement bill requesting early payment so that

counsel's fees may be discharged without delay.

(Law Institute Journal,

Australia.)

ACCOUNTABILITY FOR ESTATE DUTY

OF

A

PURCHASER

FROM

THE

PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF REAL

ESTATE

INCLUDING

FREEHOLD

REGISTERED LAND

A member wrote to the Society with reference to

the refusal by solicitors for a vendor to furnish a

certificate of discharge from death duties in the case

of a sale by a

legal personal representative of

freehold registered land compulsorily acquired under

the Land Acts. Although the question is one of

strict law the Society has been in correspondence

with the Revenue Commissioners and has obtained

the opinion of the Commissioners on the question

of whether such a purchaser may be liable for estate

duty on the property after the sale has been com

pleted if no certificate has been obtained.

The

opinion of the Commissioners is that no protection

is afforded to the purchaser either by section 19 (i)

of the Administration of Estates Act, 1959 or section

8 (18) of the Finance Act, 1894. The liability for

estate duty does not, it seems, follow the purchase

money into the hands of the legal personal represen

tative but continues to attach to the property itself.

The practical effect of all this is that a purchaser

from a personal representative of real property must

make sure to obtain a certificate of discharge from

death duties in order to protect himself. This applies

to freehold registered land as well. Furthermore,

where there is a death on the title within twelve years

a certificate should be asked for and should be given.

It appears that the only case where the certificate of

discharge from death duties is not, strictly speaking,

necessary is in a sale of a leasehold or tenancy interest

by

an

executor

or

administrator

as

such

interests are personal property and the executor or

personal representative alone is accountable for the

estate duty thereon. If the Revenue Commissioners'

view of the law on this question is correct, and it

must be taken for practical purposes to be correct,

then it follows as a matter of conveyancing practice

that a purchaser is entitled to requisition a certificate

of discharge from death duties where he is buying

freehold lands including freehold registered lands

from the legal personal representative (or where there

is a death on the title within twelve years) and the

vendor is not entitled to refuse it.

The foregoing is not meant to be an authoritative

statement of law but is published merely for the

information and guidance of members.

PROCEEDINGS AGAINST SOLICITORS

By order of the President of the High Court,

dated nth September, 1961, on a petition of the

Society grounded on a report of the Disciplinary

Committee, it was directed that the name of George

M. Hegarty who formerly practised at Castletown-

berehaven, Co. Cork, be struck off the Roll of

Solicitors.

By order of the President of the High Court,

dated zoth September, 1961, on a petition of the

Society grounded upon a report of the Disciplinary

Committee, it was directed that the name of Leonard

E. M. Downes who formerly practised at 9 Mary

Street, Dublin, be struck off the Roll of Solicitors.

By order of the President of the High Court, dated

i yth November, 1961, on a petition of the Society

grounded upon a report of the Disciplinary Com

mittee, it was directed that Patrick Cunningham,

solicitor, of 18 Palmerston Gardens, Rathmines,

Dublin, be suspended from practice for the then

current practice year 1961/62.

MEETINGS OF THE COUNCIL

FEBRUARY IST :

The President in the Chair. Also

present, Messrs. Brendan T. Walsh, John Carrigan,

John R. Halpin, N. S. Gaffney, John J. Nash,

Francis J. Lanigan, Thomas A. O'Reilly, Peter D. M.

Prentice, R. A. French, John Kelly, James R. C.

79