Previous Page  163 / 244 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 163 / 244 Next Page
Page Background

Vol.

No.

45

2

June,

1951

THE GAZETTE

of the

INCORPORATED LAW SOC IETY OF IRELAND

President

Vice-Presidents

Secretary

R

oger

G

reen e

N

ia ll

S. G

affn ey

E

ric

A . P

lunkett

F

rancis

J. G

earty

FOR CIRCULATION AMONG MEMBERS

MEETINGS OF THE COUNCIL

M

ay

29TH.

A special meeting o f the Council

'was held to consider a report from a Committee

on a suggested application for an increase in the

scales of solicitors’ item charges under the Solicitors’

Remuneration General Orders 1884-1947, and

for other amendments to the Orders. In the absence

of the President and Vice-Presidents, Mr. William

j. Norman took the Chair. Also present: Messrs.

Sean

0

hUadhaigh, James J. O’Connor, Arthur

Cox, Patrick R. Boyd, John J. Sheil, Thomas A.

O’Reilly, William S. Huggard, John Carrigan,

Dermot P. Shaw, Desmond Mayne, Edmund

Hayes, Daniel O’Connell.

The following decisions were reached : (i) An

application should be made to the Committee

appointed under Section 2 of the Solicitors’

Remuneration Act, 1881, consisting of the Chief

Justice, the President of the High Court, the Senior-

Ordinary Judge of the Supreme Court and the

President of the Incorporated Law Society of

Ireland, for an order increasing the scale fees for

item charges under the bid system as modified

by Schedule 2 by 75 per cent, on the fees charged

in 1939, in substitution for the increases granted

in 1947. The last mentioned increases were 25 per

cent, in respect of letters and attendances, and

i6§ per cent, in respect of other work, calculated

in both cases on the fees charged in 1939; (ii)

Having regard to the majority decision o f the

Supreme Court (O’Byrne and Lavery, J J ., dis­

senting), in the case of Lanigan

v.

Carlow Mental

Board, the Committee should be asked to rescind

Rule 1 1 , part 1, Schedule 1, of the Solicitors’ Re­

muneration General Order, 1884, which provides

that the commission scale does not apply in the

case of sales under the Land Clauses Consolidation

Acts or other Acts incorporating the same ; (iii) The

Committee should be asked to amend the first

commission scale in Part 2, Schedule 1, Solicitors’

Remuneration General Order, 1884, as amended,

which prescribes the charges for leases and

agreements for leases at a rack rent, by providing

that where the rent exceeds £100 per annum the

commission is to be paid as a percentage on the