Previous Page  164 / 244 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 164 / 244 Next Page
Page Background

actual amount of the rent. At present, subject

to the limited operation o f Rule 6 of Schedule i,

Patt 2, the commission is payable only in respect

of unbroken units of

£100.

The Secretary was directed to prepare the case

in support of the application and the following

were appointed as a Special Committee to settle

it and to attend before the Committee on the

application:

Messrs. Niall S. Gaffney, Vice-

President, G. A. Overend, Dermot P. Shaw, John

J. Sheil.

J

une

14 T H .

Mr. Niall S. Gaffney, Vice-President,

in the Chair. Also present: Messrs. Francis J.

Gearty, Vice-President; G. A. Overend, Patrick

R. Boyd, Derrick M. Martin, James R. Quirke,

Joseph Barrett, Daniel O’Connell, Thomas A.

O’Reilly, Reginald J. Nolan, Patrick F. O’Reilly,

John R. Halpin, John J. Sheil, John J. Nash,

James J. O’Connor, William J. Norman, Arthur

Cox, Desmond Mayne.

The following was among the business trans­

acted :—

Branch Office, Adequate supervision

AB , a practising solicitor, died some years ago.

CD, who practises in a town fifty miles distant,

continued the practice of AB for the purpose of

winding it up. The practice of the deceased solicitor

was continued under a business name. The office

of AB was open daily under the supervision o f an

unqualified managing clerk, and CD attended from

his own office, usually once a week, for the purpose

of supervising the business. The matter was brought

to the attention of the Council by members of the

Society, and, having invited the views of CD, the

Council decided that in their opinion it was not

possible for CD to supervise adequately the

transaction of clients’ business in the branch office

fifty miles distant from his own office, and that,

unless arrangements could be made to sell the

the practice within a specified time, a qualified

solicitor should be engaged to manage the branch

office, or that, alternatively, the branch office

should be opened only on days when CD attended

there personally. The general principle is that it

is not in accordance with proper professional

practice that a solicitor’s office should be managed

by an unqualified assistant without adequate pro­

fessional supervision o f clients’ business. While

the adequacy of the supervision must depend upon

the facts of particular cases, the Council are generally

of the opinion that a branch office which is open

daily should be managed by a qualified assistant.

If there is no permanent qualified assistant in charge

of the office it should be open only on days when

the principal attends in person.

Undertaking by solicitor

AB acted for his father, FB, who was sole executor

of the will of JQ , deceased. Probate was granted

on 22nd October,

1 9 4 1 .

In March,

1 9 4 9 ,

CD,

solicitor, was consulted by a residuary legatee

whose distributive share of £750 had not been

paid. It appeared that the executor had handled

the administration himself and that the solicitor

was not fully familiar with the details. The executor

appeared to have overpaid some of the legatees

by failing to deduct the full legacy duty, and had

not paid CD’s client whose share, however, was

on deposit receipt. Sufficient moneys had not been

retained by the executor to pay A B ’s costs. After

correspondence AB wrote to CD enclosing the

deposit receipt for £750 in the client’s name on

CD ’s undertaking to hold it pending settlement.

CD alleged that the administration account furnished

was unsatisfactory and asked the Council to say

whether, having regard to the alleged, failure of

the executor to furnish a satisfactory account, he

was absolved from his undertaking, and whether

he might hand the deposit receipt to his client

in order to save the estate the expense o f Court

proceedings.

The opinion of the Council was

that CD could not release himself from the under­

taking given, presumably on his client’s instructions,

and that, if so advised, he ought to consult counsel

as to his client’s legal rights.

Auctioneer and house agent employed by

solicitor

It was reported to the Society that a person

holding an auctioneer’s and house agent’s licence

was in the employment o f a solicitor as a clerk.

The Secretary was directed to write to the solicitor

concerned to enquire whether the facts as stated

to the Council are correct, and, on confirmation

o f the facts as stated, to invite the solicitor’s attention

to the notification to the profession published in

the Society’s

Gazette

for June, 1950, that it is not

in accordance with professional practice and etiquette

for a solicitor to employ as a clerk a person holding

an auctioneer’s or house agent’s licence.

Application under Section 18

On a report from the Court of Examiners the •

Council decided not to oppose the application to

the Chief Justice by an intending apprentice for

exemption from the Preliminary Examination.

The applicant holds the Leaving Certificate of the

Ministry of Education, Northern Ireland.

14