Previous Page  90 / 244 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 90 / 244 Next Page
Page Background

Appeal out o f time—Error o f Counsel

In re Macadam (1951, All E.R. 659), the English

Court of Appeal had to decide on an application

for an extension of the time for an appeal from the

High Court in a bankruptcy matter. The relevant

rule provided that subject to the power of the Court

o f Appeal to extend the time under special circum­

stances, no appeal lay to the Court of Appeal after

the expiration of 21 days. The applicants, therefore,

had to justify their application for an extension of

the time for appealing by showing the existence of

special circumstances.

The facts were that on

January 23rd the Divisional Court dismissed an

appeal from the order o f the County Court Judge,

giving leave to appeal to the Court of Appeal. During

a casual conversation after the hearing, the solicitors

for the applicants raised the question o f the time

allowed for an appeal, and counsel, in error,

suggested the period was six weeks. On February

22nd the solicitors attempted to lodge notice of

appeal which was refused, having regard to the

terms o f the rules. On the hearing of the application

for an extension, the Court of Appeal referred to

in Re Coles & Ravenshear (1907 1 K .B . 1), in

which it had been decided that a mistake on the part

of legal advisers of the would be appellants should

not be regarded as special circumstances for the

purpose of an extension of time. In view, however,

of the fact that the applicants were the trustees of a

settlement, and that there might be persons other

than the bankrupt interested under the settlement,

the fact that the property remained vested in the

trustees so that nobody was the worse off for the

mistake, coupled with the fact that counsel for the

trustee and bankrupt did not press very strongly

for the rejection of the application, the Court

decided to find that there were special circumstances

which would justify them in granting the application

sought, on the terms that the applicants should

pay the costs.

THE REGISTRY

Register A

Experienced court clerk required next September. Applica­

tions, in writing, stating experience and salary expected to

Messrs. D. & T. Fitzgerald, 30 Anglesea Street, Dublin.

Old established lucrative practice for sale in thriving town

in South of Ireland with surrounding populous farming

district. Premises, goodwill, office equipment, etc. Box No.

A126.

REG ISTRATION OF T IT L E ACTS, 1891 and 1942

NOTICE

Folio

19603

C

ounty

T

ipperary

R

egistered

O

wner

: M

ichael

H

effernan

An Application has been made by the Registered

Owner to the Registrar of Titles for the issue of a

Certificate o f Title in substitution for the Certificate

specified in the Schedule hereto, which, it is alleged,

has been lost or inadvertently destroyed.

The

Registrar of Titles will issue a duplicate Certificate

unless he is notified within 28 days from the date

of this Notice that the said Certificate of Title is

still in existence and in the custody o f some person

other than the above named Registered Owner.

Any such notification should state the grounds on

which the Certificate in question is being held.

Dated-this 29th day of July, 1950.

J

oseph

O’B

yrne

,

Registry of Titles.

Land Registry,

Central Office,

Chancery Street,

Dublin.

S

chedule

above

referred

to

Land Certificate of Michael Heffernan to 4a. 1 r. op.

o f the lands of Deerpark (E. D. Shronell) situate in

the Barony of Castlewilliam and County of Tip­

perary being the lands No. 1 comprised in said Folio.

Printed by Cahill & Co., Ltd., Parkgate Printing Works, Dublin.