Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  140 / 258 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 140 / 258 Next Page
Page Background

1662

Butler-Thompson et al.:

J

ournal of

AOAC I

nternational

V

ol.

98, N

o.

6, 2015

acceptable since repeatability only exceeded the requirement by

1–2%, and all of the products that exceeded the reproducibility

requirement except one were near or below the minimum SMPR

reproducibility level of 0.3 µg/100 g RTF liquid.

Several laboratories provided comments about the method.

Some laboratories noted that they did not always know how

much vitamin B

12

was in the samples that they were testing, so it

was hard to know how much filtrate to load onto the solid-phase

extraction cartridge. Some laboratories had safety concerns

about working with potassium cyanide, and another laboratory

asked for a procedure to check SPE cartridge efficiency and

vitamin B

12

recovery. To address these concerns, a safety section

and an SPE cartridge qualification procedure were added to the

Final Action method.

Conclusions

AOAC Method

2011.10

was collaboratively studied by

nine to 11 laboratories from eight different countries with a

variety of infant, pediatric, and adult matrixes. Per the AOAC

ERP, the method demonstrated acceptable repeatability and

reproducibility and met the SPIFAN SMPR for the majority

of product matrixes analyzed. Although repeatability and

reproducibility for some product matrixes exceeded the

requirements in SMPR 2011.005, it was the majority opinion

of the ERP that these results were acceptable since repeatability

only exceeded the requirement by 1–2%, and all of the products

that exceeded the reproducibility requirement except one

were near or below the minimum SMPR reproducibility level

of 0.3 µg/100 g RTF liquid.

Figure 2011.10E. Typical sample chromatogram.

Figure 2011.10D. Typical standard chromatogram.

140