Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  235 / 258 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 235 / 258 Next Page
Page Background

F

eng

et al

.:

J

ournal of

AOAC I

nternational

V

ol

.

100, N

o

.

2, 2017 

517

Table 3. Spike-recovery data obtained in duplicate for

different levels on 1 day

Spike

level

Integrated area

Measured Theoretical

Recovery,

%

Total whey Casein Whey, %

Whey, %

spiked

Whey, %

spiked

0

90447 431555 21.3

95042 450546 21.4

1

467929 454430 59.0 37.7

39.0

96.6

489937 464188 59.6 38.3

39.0

98.1

2

686816 457990 67.7 46.4

46.2

100.5

699775 481562 67.0 45.7

46.2

99.0

3

823437 448464 72.0 50.7

50.8

99.7

847557 455946 72.2 50.9

50.8

100.2

4

1181386 467897 77.9 56.6

56.5

100.2

1179619 504671 76.6 55.3

56.5

97.8

Table 4. Spike-recovery data obtained in singlet for

different levels on 3 different days

Level

Day

Area

Measured

Theoretical

Total

whey Casein

Whey,

%

Whey, %

spiked

Whey, %

spiked

Recovery,

%

0

1 112590 581315 20.0

2 134644 668598 20.6

3 125910 626821 20.6

1

1 544500 636291 54.5 34.5 32.1 107.6

2 528392 647887 53.3 32.7 31.3 104.4

3 544475 625202 54.9 34.4 33.0 104.2

2

1 632182 609700 59.2 39.2 37.3 105.0

2 654331 605001 60.2 39.6 36.6 108.1

3 698583 633572 60.7 40.1 38.3 104.8

3

1 805608 630879 64.1 44.1 41.4 106.6

2 789708 615699 64.2 43.6 40.8 106.9

3 836902 621176 65.4 44.8 42.3 105.8

4

1 939097 642338 67.2 47.2 44.7 105.6

2 930074 631568 67.3 46.7 44.1 105.8

3 906509 594583 68.1 47.5 45.6 104.3

Table 5. Repeatability and intermediate precision for three

infant formulas

Day

Formula/Replicate

1/1

1/2

2/1

2/2

3/1

3/2

1

61.0

60.8

55.9

57.2

64.4

64.2

2

59.7

59.8

56.5

56.1

64.4

64.7

3

60.5

59.3

56.2

56.1

64.4

65.1

4

60.0

59.9

56.1

56.6

64.2

64.2

5

59.5

58.8

56.4

56.5

64.8

65.2

6

59.3

59.7

57.1

57.8

64.9

64.8

 Avg.

59.9

56.4

64.7

 RSD

r

, %

0.5

0.8

0.3

 RSD

R

, % 1.0

0.8

0.7

Table 6. Repeatability and intermediate precision for SMP

and demineralized sweet whey ingredient

Day

SMP

a

SMP

a

DW

b

DW

b

1

21.7

21.2

95.5

98.6

2

20.1

19.8

98.3

97.9

3

21.8

21.4

97.4

97.6

4

21.6

21.9

97.0

98.3

5

22.2

22.4

98.5

99.2

6

22.1

22.4

98.8

97.9

 Avg.

21.7

97.9

 RSD

r

, %

1.5

0.9

 RSD

R

, %

3.8

1.0

a

 Because SMP is not processed like infant formula, a CF of 1.29 was

used.

b

 Because whey protein contains almost no caseins, no CF was used.

Table 7. Repeatability and intermediate precision for two

infant formulas

Rep. 1 Rep. 2 Rep. 3 Rep. 4 Rep. 5 Rep. 6 Avg.

SD RSD

Day

Formula 4

1

71.2 70.5 70.7 71.1 71.1 70.8 70.9 0.3 0.4

2

71.0 70.7 71.2 70.7 70.7 70.8 70.9 0.2 0.3

3

70.6 70.4 70.1 70.3 70.5 70.3 70.3 0.2 0.2

Total

70.7 0.3 0.5

Formula 5

1

40.7 41.8 41.6 41.3 41.1 41.7 41.4 0.4 1.0

2

41.7 42.4 42.5 41.2 42.2 42.2 42.0 0.5 1.2

3

41.8 42.0 42.0 42.1 41.9 41.6 41.9 0.2 0.4

Total

41.8 0.5 1.1

Accuracy (Spike Recovery)

Accuracy was evaluated in samples where four levels of

sweet whey ingredient were spiked into the same level of SMP

by comparing the theoretically calculated percentage whey

values with the measured values obtained using equations 1

and 2 (for skim milk, where no whey proteins were added, the

CF was set to 1.29). The results are listed in Tables 3 and 4. The

SMPs and whey protein ingredients used in Tables 3 and 4 are

from different lot numbers.

Precision

Two independent sample preparations were tested on each

day for 6 separate days for the following: three infant formula

samples (shown in Table 5), one SMP sample, and one sweet

whey (demineralized) sample (shown in Table 6). Two other

infant formula samples were tested by preparing and analyzing six

replicates each day on 3 different days using this method (shown

in Table 7). The percentage of whey protein was reported to one

decimal place for individual and averaged replicates. The SD and

percentage RSDs were calculated and also reported to one decimal

place. Data are presented in Tables 5–7. The typical e-grams for

each infant formula sample are presented in Figures 10–14.

The molar attenuation (or molar extinction) coefficient,

reflected as the mass-to-area ratio at 220 nm, is an intrinsic

235