Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  32 / 258 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 32 / 258 Next Page
Page Background

H

aselberger

&

J

acobs

:

J

ournal of

AOAC I

nternational

V

ol

.

99, N

o

. 6, 2016 

1587

calculation of the actual fructan content but, at the same time,

serves as the primary determinant of selectivity.

LOQ

Data relevant to LOQ is summarized in Table 3. For the

9% sucrose solution spiked with 0.03% scFOS, average

recovery was 97%, RSD

r

was 6.12%, and RSD

IP

was 7.42%.

This RSD

r

at this level is just beyond the SMPR limit of 6%.

Table 3 also shows data for the SPIFAN infant formula powder

with FOS/GOS. The total fructan content of this material was

determined to be very close to the SMPR specified LOQ of

0.03%. For that sample, both RSD

r

(2.14%) and RSD

IP

(3.19%)

were well below the 6% repeatability limit.

Figure 4. Example of product containing Synergy 1 spiked at ~1.1 g/100 g (Part I), – Upper trace: inulin (Beneo Orafti HP); middle trace:

SPIFAN adult nutritional powder low fat, 00859RF00; lower trace: Ingredion Nutraflora scFOS. Time interval from 36–44 min zoomed in to show

detail.

Figure 5. Example of product containing HP (Part I), spiked at ~1.1 g/100 g – Upper trace: inulin (Beneo Orafti HP); middle trace: SPIFAN

infant formula powder partially hydrolyzed soy, 410457651Z; lower trace: Ingredion Nutraflora scFOS. Time interval from 36–44 min zoomed in

to show detail.

32