78 / 122
78 |
Southern Corridor GRIP 2017–2026
Average daily
Technical Capacity
Range
Booked non interruptible + interruptible Capacity
Apr
2014
Jun
2014
Aug
2014
Oct
2014
Dec
2014
Feb
2015
Apr
2015
Jun
2015
Aug
2015
Oct
2015
Dec
2015
Feb
2016
0
140
120
100
40
20
60
80
160
GWh/d
IP Panigaglia (GNL Italia > Snam Rete Gas)
Figure 5.63:
Panigaglia : Flows and booked capacity
vs. technical capacity (monthly)
Technical Capacity
Flow
Booked non interruptible + interruptible Capacity
Booked non interruptible Capacity
GWh/d
IP Panigaglia (GNL Italia > Snam Rete Gas)
Apr
2014
Jun
2014
Aug
2014
Oct
2014
Dec
2014
Feb
2015
Apr
2015
Jun
2015
Aug
2015
Oct
2015
Dec
2015
Feb
2016
0
140
120
100
40
20
60
80
160
Figure 5.64:
Panigaglia : Flows and booked capacity
vs. technical capacity (daily)
C. LNG ENTRY POINTS
Differently from the dynamics experienced at pipelines interconnection points, at
LNG Entry Points gas flows are intrinsically more fluctuating, especially if the
punctual, daily values are considered.
More stable indications can be drawn from the analysis of monthly dynamics.
Although the LNG imports are generally more volatile than the pipeline ones, and
therefore the terminals may know periods of low utilisation, depending on the market
conditions, the role of LNG terminals both, on one hand, for security of supply and
peak shaving needs and, on the other hand, for the exploitation of possible
commercial opportunities cannot be denied or based on the study of a limited time
window.
In this paragraph the technical capacity is meant to be the regasification capacity of
the terminal which may be different from that of the downstream pipeline
infrastructure.
Panigaglia (GNL Italia > Snam Rete Gas)