Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  29 / 96 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 29 / 96 Next Page
Page Background

29

No data available

for Kosovo* GHG

total emissions

Production by type of source

Production per capita

GHG emissions

Millions of Tonnes of oil equivalent

Tonnes of oil equivalent

Total Production

Millions of Tonnes of CO

2

equivalent

Excluding Land-Use Change and Forestry

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

0

0.5 1.0

2.0

0,08

0,12

0,15 0,16 0,18

0,21

0,24

1.5

0

50

100%

2000

2005

2012

Energy intensity

Tonnes of oil equivalent/1 000 USD

2010

Renewables

(solid biofuels, solar, wind,

hydro and geothermal)

Others

Croatia

Albania

Bosnia and

Herzegovina

FYR Macedonia

Kosovo*

Montenegro

Serbia

3.3

23.5

56.2

Part from fuel

combustion

Total

*This designation is without prejudice to positions on status, and is in line with UNSCR 1244/99 and the ICJ Opinion on the Kosovo declaration of independence.

Sources: IEA,“EnergyAtlas”,

(iea.org,

accessOctober2015);WRI,“ClimateDataExplorer”

(cait.ori.org

,accessOctober2015).

Energy

Copyright© 2015GRID-Arendal

Cartografare ilpresente/NievesLópez Izquierdo

infrastructure across countries, with extensive daily

and seasonal exchanges of electricity occurring. The

energy intensity (an indicator of energy efficiency)

5

of the Western Balkans is high. This can be attributed

to three main factors: the degraded state of the

energy infrastructure; high energy losses during

transformation, transmission and distribution; and

inefficiency in the end-use sector.

Energy systems within the region are considered to

be very vulnerable to extreme events and changes

in river temperatures (World Bank, 2014). The

extent and nature of the impacts depend on the

degree to which countries rely on different energy

sources. Thermal power production is vulnerable

to changes in climate through water availability

and temperature, due to the high dependence of

these power plants on cooling water. Lower levels

in lakes and rivers, reduced run-off, accelerated

evaporation and warmer water could also reduce

the amount of water for cooling or cause restrictions

on cooling water intake or discharge, constraining

generation capacity (World Bank, 2009). Taking

into account the effects of climate change on river

water temperatures and river flows, the capacity of

nuclear and fossil-fuelled power plants in Southern

and Eastern Europe could face a 6–19 percent

decline for the time period 2031–2060 compared to

1971–2000 (Van Vliet

et al.

, 2012).

More frequent extreme events, such as flooding,

will also threaten all types of energy infrastructure

and possibly drive up maintenance costs (UNEP/

ENVSEC, 2012), although there is only a limited

number of studies assessing this (World Bank, 2014).

Much of the energy infrastructure in the Western