Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  93 / 188 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 93 / 188 Next Page
Page Background

91

organisations. Funding often provides the ability and focus for the academic to spend

valuable time, when the competing priorities of teaching and research also demand their

attention. Funding most commonly applies to cooperation in R&D, commercialisation

of licenses or patents or in entrepreneurship, through the creation of a start-up. Funding

has been documented as an incentive or driver to encourage academic entrepreneurial

activities. The lack of funding can constitute a formal institutional barrier that may

deter the intention of the academic to pursue the opportunity if the institution does

not provide the appropriate institutional structure to encourage entrepreneurial activity.

Marquardt et al.: Driving force or forced transition? The role of development

cooperation in promoting energy transitions in the Philippines and

Morocco [23]

Transition management has been developed as a particular analytical framework

for studying the link between niche level experiments and the regime level context in

transitions towards sustainability (and sustainable energy supply). The approach is based

on earlier transitions studies like strategic niche management, complex systems analysis,

or evolutionary theories and models. The empirical focus lies on OECD countries like

the Netherlands or Germany. On the one hand, transition management is used as an

analytical framework for renewable energy projects in developing countries. On the

other hand, the OECD-centric approach is confronted with empirical insights from

the developing world. Beyond that, in-depth empirical insights from Morocco and the

Philippines should enhance our understanding on the role of development cooperation

for promoting energy transitions in developing countries.

Addressing global threats like climate change, biodiversity loss or natural resources

exploitation requires deep-structural changes, or in other words, “transitions towards

sustainability”. Since the beginning of its development in 2001 transition management

has evolved as a framework for understanding these transitions and the complex

interactions between niche level interventions and system-wide change. Development

cooperation projects can be seen as a form of niche experimentation to foster transitions.

Although transition management has not received much attention in the field, this

approach can be a useful analytical framework for development cooperation.

Three crucial commonalities between transition management and development

cooperation should be highlighted:

1. Sustainable development goals: Transition management aims to capture all

dimensions of sustainability. This goal-oriented perspective represents also the

fundamental paradigmbehind current development cooperation and the United

Nations post-2015 development agenda (Sustainable Development Goals).

2. Focus on regime level change: Transition management defines a regime shift

as the overarching goal for any transition towards sustainability. Success or

failure of development cooperation can be assessed by its regime changing

effects, e.g. on a country’s electricity system. This broad perspective is similar

to discussions around impact evaluations for donor-driven activities.

3. Agents for change: Donors can be framed as agents that create protected

niches “in which new socio-technical configurations can grow and conditions