Previous Page  115 / 270 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 115 / 270 Next Page
Page Background

GAZETTE

JUNE 1980

that is in force (

lex lata

) and the law which it is desired to

establish (

lex ferenda)

is not always clearly drawn.

Prof. Schwarzenberger has been criticised for what has

been described as an unduly conservative and restrictive

approach to the development of new rules of international

law. Such criticism is based on a misapprehension. He

and Prof. Brown are not opposed to the emergence of new

rules in any sphere, and discuss the pros and cons of new

developments where appropriate, e.g. the new emerging

law of the sea (Chapter 5) and the de jure and de facto

revision of the Charter of the U.N. (Chapter 10).

Incidentally, as regards the law of the sea and the Rockall

issue, Irish readers will note with interest the "illus-

trative" official U.K. Naval Chart on the Maritime

Frontiers of the U.K. which is reproduced on page 102.

Where the authors differ from others is their repeated

insistence on the necessity for evidence that a new rule

has been established, and their reminders that a clear

distinction exists between the problem of the "the

technical improvement of international law as a legal

system to make it commensurate with the needs of

contemporary world society" and the problem of "an

international order on which international law may safely

rest" (p. 312).

Proposals for sweeping reforms in the international

legal system, however desirable in principle, are likely to

remain Utopian if unrelated to the type of international

order on which they must rest.

Users of this Manual will obtain a general introduction

to the theory of international law, a necessarily brief state-

ment of the established rules, a remarkably wide and

comprehensive reference book for further investiga-

tions into a chosen topic and a thought provoking

discussion of many of the problems of a world dominated

by the Super Powers.

J. F. O'Connor

The Irish Constitution

by J. M. Kelly. Jurist Publishing

Co. Ltd., University College Belfield, Dublin 4 1980

xxxii, 605 pp. £22.80 (paperback), £28.30 (hard-

back) including V.A.T. and postage.

If the Irish lawyer has not been overwhelmed by the

quantity of books on Irish law in recent years, he can

have no complaint about the quality. To John Wylie's

classic books on land law we can now add this major

w

ork from John Kelly on the Irish constitution. Professor

Kelly has done for his sibject what Professor Wylie did

for his. He has provided us with a systematic treatment in

Print of the sources of constitutional law in this state and

he has equally for the first time given an exposition of the

vast range of principles and rulings developed in

constitutional litigation and practice over the years.

That it takes 600 pages to achieve this, and the citation

over 500 cases is a measure not only of the author's

achievement but the size of the gap this book now fills. It

,s

a serious rebuke to us all as lawyers, whether academic,

or practising, that we have had to wait this long for the

hrst comprehensive commentary on our basic law. Before

this, the constitutional jurisprudence of the state, a

subject that affects all citizens and invades every area of

legal practice, was scattered through the decision of the

courts reported and unreported or available only in the

heads of practitioners. But our low productivity as writers

about law is a theme for another day. With the

appearance of John Kelly's book we can celebrate

another field covered and expect confidently that it will

prove an equal success to the Wylie volumes. It certainly

deserves to do so.

This book takes the form of annotations on each article

of Bunreacht na hEireann and since that document

follows so closely the provisions of the 1922 Constitution

the work embraces all that remains important about that

constitution as well. It is not, no more than Wylie, a book

to be read at one sitting. But for the practitioner it will

prove invaluable as a reference book and because of its

organisation, easy to use as such. For those with time for

curiousity, much will be learned by browsing (for the

author the following: the name of the State is

not

the

Republic of Ireland, that is its description, the name is Éire,

or in the English language, Ireland, — Art. 4). For the

student the book will be indispensable, and remembering

that the Constitution has a lot to say about the Oireachtas

and its procedures we may yet see Kelly being read into

Hansard

as assuredly we will see it cited in the Four

Courts.

Aside from the fact of judicial review of legislation it

has been in the specifications of fundamental rights that

the Irish constitution has differed most from the British

constitutional model, which in other respects it mirrors

quite closely. At least half of this book is given over to the

analysis of the case law on Article 40-44 concerning

fundamental rights more especially since

Ryan

v.

Attorney

General

(1965) I.R. The practitioner and the general

public will find in the book, set out in crystal clear style,

the impact of the enormous number of 'state-side'

applications since that decision, cases he may otherwise

only recall as a stream of headlines in the newspapers.

These cases have resulted in some fields in the rewriting of

areas of common law for example criminal procedure,

and Professor Kelly's book is the only place where the

current law is to be found.

With one reservation, the book is easy to read and well

constructed. The text of the constitution is set out article

by article in bold type, each article followed by the detailed

commentary. The commentary is helpfully broken up by

marginal notes that aid the reader to find the exact point

he may be searching for. The reservation concerns the

failure to use quotation marks for the very frequent

citations from decisions. These are set in on the page, so

that they can be distinguished from the author's

commentary, but it is easy to confuse citation and

comment, and quotation marks would have helped. The

organisation of the statute index is crude; U.K. and

Northern Ireland Acts being distinguished by prefixes.

There are conventions established for citations and they

should have been followed.

But these are minor matters. Professor Kelly's

enormous industry and scholarship in preparing this book

deserves our acclaim and buying it is one way of

demonstrating that.

K. Boyle.

109