Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  249 / 561 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 249 / 561 Next Page
Page Background

INFORMS Nashville – 2016

249

3 - Vssa – A Variable Sample-size Stochastic Approximation

Schemes For Stochastic Convex Optimization

Uday V. Shanbhag, Pennsylvania State University,

udaybag@engr.psu.edu

, Afrooz Jalilzadeh, Jose Blanchet,

Peter W Glynn

Traditional stochastic approximation (SA) schemes employ a single gradient or a

fixed batch of noisy gradients in computing a new iterate. We consider SA

schemes in which Nk samples are utilized at step k and the total simulation

budget is M. This paper derives error bounds in this budget-constrained regime in

both strongly convex and convex regimes with constant and increasing sample-

sizes. Notably, trade-offs between sample-complexity and computational

complexity are examined. Preliminary numerics suggest that such avenues

provide approximate solutions in less than a hundredth of the time taken by

standard SA schemes with modest drops in accuracy.

4 - A New Consistency Theory For Approximate Bayesian Inference

Ye Chen, University of Maryland,

yechen@math.umd.edu,

Ilya O Ryzhov

Approximate Bayesian inference is a powerful methodology for constructing

statistical learning mechanisms in problems where incomplete information is

collected sequentially. Approximate Bayesian models have been widely applied,

but the convergence or consistency results for approximate Bayesian estimators

are largely unavailable. We develop a new consistency theory for these learning

schemes by interpreting them as stochastic approximation (SA) algorithms with

additional “bias” terms. We prove the convergence of a general SA algorithm of

this type, and through this, for the first time, show the consistency of several

approximate Bayesian methods from the recent literature.

TA46

209B-MCC

Dynamic Games and Applications to Revenue

Management

Sponsored: Revenue Management & Pricing

Sponsored Session

Chair: Konstantinos Bimpikis, Stanford, Stanford, Palo Alto, CA, 94305,

United States,

kostasb@stanford.edu

1 - Dynamic Selling Mechanisms For Product Differentiation

And Learning

N. Bora Keskin, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States,

bora.keskin@duke.edu,

John R Birge

We consider a firm that designs a menu of vertically differentiated products for a

population of customers with heterogeneous quality sensitivities. The firm faces

an uncertainty about production costs. We characterize the structure of the firm’s

optimal dynamic learning policy and construct simple and practically

implementable policies that are near-optimal.

2 - When Fixed Price Meets Priority Auctions: Service Systems With

Dual Modes

Krishnamurthy Iyer, Cornell University,

kriyer@cornell.edu

,

Jiayang Gao, Huseyin Topaloglu

We consider a service system where service is offered via two modes. The first

mode charges a fixed price, and the service discipline is FIFO. In the second mode,

called the bid-based priority mode, customers submit a bid, obtain service in the

descending order of their bids, and make payments equal to their bids. We

assume the customers have heterogeneous waiting costs, and choose the service

mode strategically on arrival. We establish the existence and uniqueness of a

symmetric equilibrium, which has a simple threshold structure: customers with

either high or low waiting cost obtain service from the bid-based priority mode,

whereas those with moderate waiting cost obtain service from the FIFO mode.

3 - Customizing Marketing Decisions Using Field Experiments

Spyros Zoumpoulis, INSEAD,

spyros.zoumpoulis@insead.edu

,

Theodoros Evgeniou, Duncan I Simester, Artem Timoshenko

We investigate how firms can use the results of field experiments to optimize

marketing decisions, and in particular allocating different promotional offers to

different customer segments for the customer acquisition problem of a large

retailer. In the first stand of the work, we solve the problem of finding the optimal

one-shot promotion policy: what promotional offer should be sent to what

customer segment? In the second strand of the work, we solve the problem of

optimally retargeting nonrespondents through promotions in multiple waves:

what customer segment should we stop mailing to, and for what segment would

we benefit from repeated promotions?

TA47

209C-MCC

Personalized E-commerce

Sponsored: Revenue Management & Pricing

Sponsored Session

Chair: Van Anh Truong, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States,

vat3@cornell.edu

1 - Distribution-free Pricing

Ming Hu, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada,

Ming.Hu@rotman.utoronto.ca

, Hongqiao Chen

We study a monopoly robust pricing problem in which the seller does not know

the customers’ valuation distribution but knows its mean and variance. Such

minimum requirement of information is nothing but asking two questions: How

much your targeted customers are going to pay on average? And how sure are

you? We obtain the best robust price heuristic in closed form and provide its

distribution-free, worst-case performance bound. We then provide easily

verifiable distribution-free sufficient conditions to guarantee the pure bundle to

be more profitable than separately sales. We illustrate the benefit of bundling by a

couple of practical examples such as subscription services of digital music.

2 - Revenue Management With Consumer Search Cost

Zizhuo Wang, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN,

United States,

zwang@umn.edu

, Yan Liu, William L Cooper

We consider a pricing problem in which the product valuations are uncertain to

the consumers. The consumers can find the valuation of the product by incurring

a search cost. We study the seller’s problems of whether it should lower the

search costs of the products, and what prices it should charge. We find that when

there are two products, lowering the search cost of one product while

maintaining a high search cost for the other product may be optimal. We also

show how our results vary depending on the correlation between the uncertainty

of the products.

3 - Approximation Algorithms For Product Framing And Pricing

Anran Li, Columbia University,

al2942@columbia.edu

We propose one of the first models of “product framing” and pricing. Product

framing refers to the way consumer choice is influenced by how the products are

displayed. We present a model where consumers consider only products in a

random number of top web pages. Consumers select a product from these pages

following a general choice model. We show that the product framing problem is

NP-hard. We derive algorithms with guaranteed performance relative to an

optimal algorithm under reasonable assumptions. We also present structural

results for pricing under framing effects. At optimality, products are sorted in

descending order of quality, and prices are shown to be page dependent.

TA48

210-MCC

Social Media Analysis II

Invited: Social Media Analytics

Invited Session

Chair: Yen-Yao Wang, Michigan State University, 5211 Madison

Avenue, Apartment A5, Okemos, MI, 48864, United States,

wangyen@broad.msu.edu

1 - A Unified Framework For Credit Evaluation For Internet

Finance Companies

Meheli Basu, Graduate Research Assistant, University of

Pittsburgh, 5820 Elwood Street, APT 33, Pittsburgh, PA, 15232,

United States,

meb209@pitt.edu

We developed and detailed a multi-criteria decision-making framework based on

interface of the subjective approach of analytical hierarchical process (AHP) and

validated by comparative analysis using the objective approach of data

envelopment analysis (DEA) to evaluate credit index. Our framework identifies

and weighs the most important characteristics of SMEs and start-ups which

contribute to overall credit rating. Although our target implementation group is

the internet finance industry, our framework for credit evaluation will also give

start-ups and SMEs an insight into favorable criteria for a good credit standing.

TA48