Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  57 / 561 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 57 / 561 Next Page
Page Background

INFORMS Nashville – 2016

57

SB41

207C-MCC

Spectral Methods in Finance: Option Pricing

and Econometrics

Sponsored: Financial Services

Sponsored Session

Chair: Lingfei Li, Assistant Professor, The Chinese University of Hong

Kong, 608 William M.W.Mong Engineerng Building, Shatin, N.T., none,

Hong Kong,

lfli@se.cuhk.edu.hk

1 - Error Analysis Of Finite Difference And Markov Chain

Approximations For Option Pricing With Non-smooth Payoffs

Gongqiu Zhang, PhD Candidate, The Chinese University of Hong

Kong, ERB 802, Hong Kong,

gqzhang@se.cuhk.edu.hk,

Lingfei Li

We provide error analysis for finite difference and Markov Chain approximations

in option pricing when the payoff function is non-smooth. We assume the asset

price is a one-dimensional diffusion or a jump process constructed from a

diffusion by subordination. We show that the spatial discretization error is second

order for call and put-type payoffs and first order for digital-type payoffs.

Furthermore, averaging discontinuous payoffs can restore second order

convergence.

2 - Long Forward Probabilities, Recovery And The Term Structure Of

Bond Risk Premiums

Likuan Qin, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, 60016,

United States,

likuan.qin@gmail.com,

Vadim Linetsky

We show that the martingale component in the long-term factorization of the

stochastic discount factor due to Alvarez and Jermann (2005) and Hansen and

Scheinkman (2009) is highly volatile, produces a downward-sloping term

structure of bond Sharpe ratios, and implies that the long bond is far from growth

optimality. In contrast, the long forward probabilities forecast an upward sloping

term structure of bond Sharpe ratios and implies that the long bond is growth

optimal. Thus, transition independence and degeneracy of the martingale

component are implausible assumptions in the bond market.

3 - Parametric Inference Of Discretely Observed

Subordinate Diffusions

Weiwei Guo, The Chinese University of Hong Kong,

wwguo@se.cuhk.edu.hk

We develop a two-step procedure to estimate a class of jump processes known as

subordinate diffusions from discrete-time data. The first step identifies the

diffusion parameters using estimating functions only involve diffusion parameters

and the second step identifies the subordinator parameters using martingale

estimating functions based on eigenfunctions. Under regularity conditions, our

estimators are consistent and asymptotically normal. Numerical examples show

that our method is statistically and computationally efficient. Analysis of VIX

index indicates that a pure jump subordinate diffusion model significantly

outperforms diffusion models in modeling the VIX index.

SB42

207D-MCC

Quantitative Methods in Finance XIII

Sponsored: Financial Services

Sponsored Session

Chair: Changle Lin, Princeton University, Jersey City, NJ,

United States,

changlel@princeton.edu

Co-Chair: Woo Chang Kim, Associate Professor, KAIST, KAIST 291,

Daehak-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon, 34141, Korea, Republic of,

wkim@kaist.ac.kr

1 - Goal-based Investment Via Multi-stage Stochastic Programming

For Robo Advisor Service

Woo Chang Kim, KAIST,

wkim@kaist.ac.kr

Robo-advisors aim to attract non high-net-worth individual investors by signifi-

cantly lowering the entry barrier to professional wealth management industry.

Unfortunately, existing schemes of robo-advisors have not been sophisticated

enough to provide fully personalized investment advices. However, it surely is

challenging to ask clients, who might lack financial literacy, to provide their

detailed financial situation through online platform. Therefore, we propose a

goal-based investment model that only requires the input of wealth, income, and

consumption goals with priorities via multi-stage stochastic programming

approach.

2 - How to Train Your Lawyer

Ephrat Bitton, Future Advisor,

ephratb@gmail.com

For better or worse, Robo Advisors operate in a highly regulated industry. Folks

may roll their eyes at the mention of compliance, but it is a crucial process for

ensuring that we protect the end client. As a mathematician at FutureAdvisor,

one of my greater challenges is adequately describing to our compliance officer

how we manage portfolios using optimization. MILP can be immensely powerful

for solving complex decision problems, but it is notoriously difficult to pinpoint

the reasons for different outcomes. This talk follows my story on automating

portfolio management, ensuring the quality of our results, and finally, explaining

how it all works to someone who reads legal settlements for fun.

3 - Pricing And Hedging Guaranteed Minimum Withdrawal Benefit

With High Water Mark Benefit Base

Peiqi Wang, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, United States,

peiqiw@princeton.edu

, Patrick Cheridito

We consider pricing and hedging of Guaranteed Minimum Withdrawal Benefit

(GMWB) rider on a variable annuity (VA) contract. We price the VA+GMWB

contract by considering the optimal withdrawal strategy of the policyholder. We

show that policyholder’s payoff resulting from the optimal withdrawal strategy

corresponds to the super-replication cost of the contract and we provide a

hedging strategy. Our numerical results show that it is sometimes optimal for the

policyholder to aggressively withdraw and ruin the account. Further analysis on

the numerical results suggests how the insurer should determine the fee structure

and minimal deposit requirement.

4 - About Holistic Robo-advice Engine

Dan Dibartolomeo, Northfield Information,

dan@northinfo.com

Robo-advisors aim to attract non high-net-worth individual investors by

significantly lowering the entry barrier to professional wealth management

industry. Unfortunately, existing schemes of robo-advisors have not been

sophisticated enough to provide fully personalized investment advices. However,

it surely is challenging to ask clients, who might lack financial literacy, to provide

their detailed financial situation through online platform. Therefore, we propose a

goal-based investment model that only requires the input of wealth, income, and

consumption goals with priorities via multi-stage stochastic programming

approach.

SB43

208A-MCC

Systems Engineering and Decision Analysis

Sponsored: Decision Analysis

Sponsored Session

Chair: Robert F Bordley, PMP, MBA, Booz Allen Hamilton, Troy, MI,

United States,

bordley_robert@bah.com

1 - Value-focused Thinking For Engineering Resilient Systems

Greg Parnell, University of Arkansas,

gparnell@uark.edu

DoD’s requirements analysis identifies Key Performance Parameters to meet the

system goals. The acquisition documents identify the thresholds and objectives for

each parameter that are supported by mission analysis that considers mission

needs, technical maturity, affordability, and schedule. Multiple objective decision

analysis and Value-Focused Thinking can provide a mathematical framework for

evaluating the resilience of systems in mission scenarios under uncertainty and

the adaptability of the platform to future missions.

2 - The Systems Engineering Approach To Setting Design Targets

Robert Bordley, Booz Allen Hamilton,

bordley_robert@bah.com

Systems engineering is a value-focused process aimed at defining feasible

component-level design targets for a system which, when designed and

assembled, will best meet the needs of system stakeholders. To reach this goal,

systems engineering first defines targets at the system level, then at the subsystem

level, the assembly level etc down to the component level. At each level,

informed trade-offs are made about what is most appealing to stakeholders given

beliefs about what is technically possible. Making these tradeoffs involves

specifying alternative solutions, investigating each solution and constructing an

optimal hybrid of the solutions.

3 - A Bayesian Method For Selecting Elite Varieties Of Soybean

Jack Kloeber, Kromite, LLC, 82 Nelson Drive, Churchville, PA,

18966, United States,

jkloeber@kromite.com

, Joseph Byrum,

Tracy Doubler, Greg Doonan, Craig Davis, Peiran Zhao

In agriculture R&D, a new variety’s genetic contribution to higher yield is difficult

to separate from factors of soil, insects, weather, or agronomic practices. Varieties

are grown at multiple locations, downselecting over 4 years. Syngenta developed

a generalizable method which helps soy breeders find the genetic winner using

Bayesian Updating. The increased accuracy leads to better decision-making and

higher yield.

SB43