Previous Page  176 / 336 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 176 / 336 Next Page
Page Background

Correspondence

McCann Fitzgerald Roche & Dudley

Rue de Namur, 82

1000 Bruxelles

15th May, 1975.

Dear Mr. Gavan Duffy,

I should be grateful if you would publish a correc-

tion to some errors and omissions in my discussion of

of the Van Binsbergen case published in the April

1975 Gazette.

Some printer's gremlin inserted the words "sole and

curious" in the first full sentence on page 76. Although

it was surprising that the Irish Government argued in

that case that Artcles 59 and 60 should not be directly

applicable since the Court had already held, in the

Reyners case, that the comparable Article of the

Treaty relating to freedom of establishment was

directly applicable, nonetheless, the Irish Government

produced respectable arguments in favour of its view.

Indeed the Court adopted the compromise solution

which Ireland proposed. I feel therefore that the

insertion exaggerates the peculiarity of Ireland's

position.

Some lines were omitted from the following sentence

which should have read:

"The Irish Government, surprisingly in view of the

Reyners Decision, argued aganst the direct applic-

ability of the Articles, but stated that, if the Articles

were found to be directly applicable, their direct

applicability should be confined to the prohibition

on restrictions based on nationality or residence—

the abolition of other restrictions should be dealt

with by directives."

Yours sincerely,

Gerald Fitzgerald.

Office of the Minister for Social Welfare

Dublin 1.

30th May, 1975.

Dear Mr. Ivers,

Wi th further reference to your letter regarding de-

lays prising in the distribution of Estates after Grant

of Probate, I find that the type of crse you refer to,

namely those in which solicitors are warned of the

possible liability of 'certain Estates for repayment of

overpaid old age pensions, is of relatively small in-

cidence. These warning letters as you are aware are

based on the outcome of the due process of adjudicat-

ion as to the pensioner's entitlement.

I also find that frequently such delays as come to

notice have their origin in factors outside the involve-

ment of my Department such as a delayed response,

on the part of a personal representative of the deceas-

ed pensioner, or his solicitor, to necessary Departmental

enquiries.

I am of course anxious to co-operate in eliminating

the kind of delay in question and if you are good

enough to send me specific examples of the type of

case you have in mind I will have these examined in

depth.

Yours sincerely

Brendan Corish

Mr. J. J. Ivers,

Director General.

Valuation Office,

6, Ely Place,

Dublin 2.

13 June, 1975.

W. G. Bradley & Sons,

11 Lower Ormond Quay,

Dublin 1.

19th May, 1975.

FEES FOR SUMMONS SERVERS IN THE

DISTRICT COURT

Dear Mr. Ivers,

The National Prices Commission has authorised an

increase in the fee to be paid to a Summons Server

for the service of any Summons, Civil Process or other

originating document or any other document, to be

the sum of 70p, payable upon proof of each separate

Service effected. The Increase as mentioned shall come

into effect as from 2nd June, 1975.

This refers exclusively to the Service of documents

in the District Court, and perhaps you would kindly

arrange for publication of this, in the Gazette.

Yours sincerely,

R. Knight.

Dear Mr. Ivers,

I am very appreciative of the congratulations and

good wishes conveyed in your letter dated 4th instant.

We can arrange to meet and talk about the problem

of delays as soon as possible.

I have already taken action in this matter since my

appointment. Wi th mutual co-operation between your

members and the Valuation Office, I have high hopes

of dealing expeditiously with this problem.

If you could let me have the reference numbers of

any particular cases that are causing difficulties (wc

identify by Serial number) before you come in to see

me, I will have them investigated to find the cause

of delay.

I would like to point out that faulty identification by

a Solicitor can cause considerable delay. Where the

client does not give your member sufficient informa-

ion, a photo-copy of the rate demand note could make

all the difference in identifying the property and speed-

ing up the work.

Yours sincerely

D. F. Ryan

174