Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  119 / 1082 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 119 / 1082 Next Page
Page Background

S106

ESTRO 36 2017

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

comprehensive study regarding follow-up after CovP based

nodal boosting can be expected.

Symposium: Ultra fast online therapy adaptation

(replanning, dose accumulation QA)

SP-0212 Automatic image segmentation and structure

evaluation for on-line adaptive RT

S. Mutic

1

1

Washington University School of Medicine, Department

of Radiation Oncology, St. Louis, USA

The online adaptive radiotherapy (OART) has become a

practical reality in recent years. Through experience, we

have learned that the conventional radiotherapy planning

(RTP) practices are not directly translatable to

OART. With the OART, the entire planning process needs

to be performed very quickly and generally can take no

longer than 20-30 minutes for imaging, segmentation,

planning, and quality assurance. The efficiency

requirements of OART mean that each of the treatment

planning steps needs to be performed in minutes rather

than in hours or days, which can be afforded with the

conventional RTP processes. This rate of efficiency

demands a fundamental revisiting of the paradigms used

in conventional RTP. One of the major differences

between the OART and conventional RTP is image

segmentation and processing of the segmented

structures. For image segmentation, the OART efficiency

needs mean that 1) there will be a significantly higher

degree of reliance on auto-segmentation, 2) that few

structures may be used\delineated, 3) that the

conventional paradigms for structure creation will not be

followed and that some structure will be contoured only

to a limited extent, or 4) a combination of all three of

these approaches. Unfortunate reality is that even the

most sophisticated modern auto-contouring algorithms

still have an unacceptably high degree of failure and

inaccuracy and that these algorithms are almost always

guaranteed to need some degree of manual

editing. Additionally, many practical clinical cases are

proving themselves to be not very good candidates for

auto-contouring and that manual segmentation may be

the best\most practical approach. The suboptimal

performance of auto-contouring algorithms and use of a

significant amount of available time on manual contouring

or contour editing means that typically there is not much

time left for contour validation. This lack of time for

contour validation means that there is an increasing need

for automatic evaluation of the segmented structures. It

is well understood that suboptimal structure delineation

(target or normal organs) can lead to suboptimal or unsafe

treatment plans. Inaccuracies in structure delineation can

translate to errors in treatment planning with OART more

likely than with conventional RTP due the limited time

available for quality assurance of segmented structures

with OART. Many bodies have recommended that peer

review process should be used as the second check of

accuracy of organ delineation. With OART, prospective

peer review will likely never be practical and the accuracy

of auto-segmentation as well as the robustness of

automatic evaluation of segmented structures will have to

be able to compensate for limited ability for independent

human checks. This presentation includes discussion of

current practices in OART image segmentation with review

of disease sites which are leading in the in the initial use

of OART. Also discussed will be the image segmentation

approaches for OART. Finally, efforts for development of

automatic methods for verification of accuracy of

segmented structures will be discussed. Now that OART is

a practical reality, it is obvious that additional work is

needed in development of image segmentation algorithms

as well as development of automatic methods for

verification of segmented structures.

SP-0213 Ultra-fast treatment planning and dose

reconstruction

P. Ziegenhein

1

1

The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden

NHS Foundation Trust, Joint Department of Physics,

Sutton, United Kingdom

A new generation of hybrid MRI and linear accelerator

machines, such as the MR-linac, is currently brought into

practice which allows monitoring the changing patient

anatomy during radiation delivery. The newly acquired

images cannot only be used for real-time position

verification but also to inform a re-planning strategy

which adapts the treatment to the latest geometries. This

new technique demands for a more interactive therapy

workflow than it is used today. Treatment planning and

dose verification steps need to be carried out more

frequently and faster in order to make use of the

continuously updated patient images.

In this talk we will address two vital aspects of realizing

an online therapy adaptation workflow: ultrafast

treatment planning and dose reconstruction. Nowadays,

with the help of modern computational hardware both

operations can be performed in real-time. We will present

state-of-the-art techniques designed especially for

multi/many-core CPUs and discuss opportunities and

challenges of their application. A proof of concept study

on realistic patient data will be presented while

alternative techniques and methods are analyzed and

critically evaluated.

SP-0214 Online tumour tracking – technology and

quality assurance

E. Colvill

1

1

Aarhus University Hospital, Radiation Oncology, Aarhus

C, Denmark

Intrafraction motion during radiotherapy delivery causes a

blurring of the delivered dose distribution. For treatment

sites affected by respiratory motion, including lung, liver

and pancreas this effect can result in substantial

deviations between planned and delivered dose,

potentially compromising clinical goals. Treatment

delivery accuracy may be increased through the

implementation of adaptive delivery techniques. Online

tumour tracking adapts the treatment to anatomical

changes which may occur on the scale of seconds or

minutes. It combines monitoring of the target motion and

adaptation to that motion in real-time. In this talk a

review of motion monitoring and treatment adaptation