Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  425 / 1082 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 425 / 1082 Next Page
Page Background

S410

ESTRO 36 2017

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

MATLAB, allowing determination of the correction for

scanner inhomogeneity and calibration of film optical

density (OD) response in terms of absorbed dose to water.

Regions of interest (ROIs) of various sizes were used to

sample image data, quantifying the uncertainty associated

with variations within each film, from film to film within

the same lot, and from lot to lot. 35 sheets of film were

used, taken from 7 boxes across 3 lots. Three channels of

optical density (OD) data were analysed statistically, both

directly as OD and also in the ratios red/blue and

green/blue. Net values were obtained by subtracting pre-

irradiation values, and a normalisation correction factor,

based on large dose saturation values, was applied.

Results

The figure shows the net ratio of OD, green/blue, before

and after applying the normalisation correction, as a

function of dose, for ROIs which are 10 x 10 mm

2

. The

table lists the relative standard deviation of absorbed dose

measurements made using EBT-3 in the present work.

Conclusion

By combining the subtraction of pre-irradiation values,

with a normalisation correction based on large dose

saturation values, it should be possible to reduce the

contribution to measurement uncertainty arising from

intrinsic variations in the characteristics of EBT-3 film to

0.7 % (

k

=1) for doses in the range of up to 5 Gy.

PO-0782 New liquid ionization chamber detector of

high resolution for treatment verification in

Radiotherapy

L. Brualla-Gonzalez

1

, A. Vázquez-Luque

2

, M. Zapata

3,4

,

D.M. González-Castaño

3,5

, V. Luna-Vega

4

, J. Guiu-Souto

4

,

D. Granero

1

, A. Vicedo

1

, M.T. García-Hernández

1

, J.

Roselló

1,6

, M. Pombar

3,4

, F. Gómez

3,7

, J. Pardo-Montero

3,4

1

Hospital General Universitario de Valencia, Servicio de

Radiofísica ERESA, Valencia, Spain

2

Detection And Radiation Technologies SL, Development,

Santiago de Compostela, Spain

3

Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria IDIS, Grupo de Imaxe

Molecular, Santiago de Compostela, Spain

4

Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago de

Compostela, Servizo de Radiofísica e Protección

Radiolóxica, Santiago de Compostela, Spain

5

Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Laboratorio

de Física de Partículas RIAIDT, Santiago de Compostela,

Spain

6

Universidad de Valencia, Departamento de Fisiología de

la Facultad de Medicina, Valencia, Spain

7

Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Departamento

de Física de Partículas, Santiago de Compostela, Spain

Purpose or Objective

In this work we present a new liquid ionization chamber

array prototype for patient treatment verification. The

objective of its design is to offer a high spatial resolution

with 100% fill factor.

Material and Methods

The prototype has 2041 liquid ionization chambers of

2.5x2.5 mm

2

effective area and 0.5 mm thickness. The

detection elements are arranged in a central square grid

of 43x43, covering an area of 107.5x107.5 mm

2

. The

central inline and crossline are extended to 227 mm and

the diagonals to 321 mm. The active medium is liquid

isooctane.

We have studied short- and medium-term stability, dose

rate dependence, depth and field size dependence,

anisotropy and leaf positioning detectability.

We have measured output factors, tongue-and-groove,

garden fence, small field profiles and irregular fields.

Finally we have used it for the verification of patient

treatments.

Results

The detector presents dependency on energy that is

reflected in the response variation with depth and field

size (2.2% under-response for 6 MV, 20x20 cm

2

at 20 cm

depth).

The anisotropy study shows important deviations: 28% for

lateral incidences and 7% for posterior incidence.

The detector sensitivity for leaf positioning measurement

is 1.8 % per tenth of millimeter in the penumbra.

The output factor corresponding to 6 MV and 1x1 cm

2

shows +2% deviation compared with the measurements

obtained using a SFD diode and a CC13 gas ionization

chamber. The results are normalized to a 5x5 cm

2

. For a

10x10 cm

2

this deviation is -1%. If the energy increases the

deviations decrease (+1% for 1x1 cm

2

and -0.5% for 10x10

cm

2

in 10 MV and 15 MV).

In the measurement of small field profiles the gamma

comparison between measurements with the liquid

ionization array and radiographic film shows 100% passing

rates with tolerances 1% - 1mm.

Several patient treatments have been verified. In table 1

the comparison between the treatment planning system

and the array measurement for a particular case is shown.

We show differences in gamma passing rates when

anisotropy corrections are applied or not. Figure 1 shows

one of such comparisons.

Conclusion

A new detector array is presented for the verification of

patient treatments of high complexity.

The detector presents a small dependence on

energy, which causes a small over-response for the output

factors of small fields and an under-response for output

factors of large fields. The anisotropy of the device is

significant (28% and 7% for lateral and posterior

incidences), but can be compensated during treatment

verification by using angle-dependent correction factors.

The usefulness for the patient treatment verification has

been demonstrated by measuring different patient

treatments. The results obtained confirm the validity of

this array for dose distribution measurements of complex

treatments with small fields and high gradients.

PO-0783 Planverification in Robotic Stereotactic

Radiotherapy with the Delta4-Dosimetry-System

W. Baus

1

, G. Altenstein

1

1

Universität zu Köln, Department of Medical Physics,

Köln, Germany

Purpose or Objective

Stereotactic robotic radiotherapy with the CyberKnife

(Accuray, Sunnyvale) might not be fluency modulated

radiotherapy (IMRT) in the strict sense. However, the

technique is comparable in complexity because of a large

number of small (5 to 60 mm), highly non-coplanar fields.

Therefore, the manufacturer recommends individual plan

verification (DQA, Delivery Quality Assurance), though

only on a point dose measurement basis. The report of the