Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  453 / 1082 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 453 / 1082 Next Page
Page Background

S438

ESTRO 36 2017

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

influence matrix). After solving the optimization

problems, the optimal fluence map is imported back to

Eclipse for leaf sequencing and final dose calculation using

the Eclipse API. The entire workflow is automated,

requiring user interaction solely to prepare the contours

and beam arrangement prior to launching the HCO Eclipse

API plugin. Optimization requires ~1-3 hours, after which

the automated plan including final dose calculation is

ready in Eclipse.

Results

HCO IMRT automatic planning was tested for 10 patients

with spinal lesions who had previously been treated to 24

Gy in a single fraction using either VMAT (8 patients) or

multi-field IMRT (2 patients). All automated HCO plans

used multi-field IMRT. A typical automated and clinical

plan comparison is shown in Figure 1, demonstrating

improved PTV coverage, cord and esophagus sparing with

the automated plan. As shown in Table 1, on average, the

automated plan improved PTV coverage (V95%) by 1%,

cord maximum dose by 2%, cord D0.35cc by 12%, cauda

maximum dose by 15%, and esophagus V18Gy by 100%. All

HCO plans met all clinical planning criteria.

Table-1.

Comparison of clinical and HCO automated plans

for ten patients. For each criterion, the better score is

bolded.

Figure-1.

Comparison of the clinical and automated plans

for a patient. A1-A3 represent the automated plan and C1-

C3 represent the clinical plan.

Conclusion

Hierarchical constrained optimization shows promise as a

powerful tool to automate IMRT treatment planning. The

automated treatment plan meets all clinical criteria and

compares favorably in relevant metrics to the plan

generated by planners. Using Eclipse API, we developed a

plugin which fully automates the workflow and can be

implemented into clinical use after thorough testing.

Poster: Physics track: Treatment planning: applications

PO-0824 IMRT dose painting for prostate cancer using

PSMA-PET/CT: a planning study based on histology

K. Koubar

1,2

, C. Zamboglou

2,3

, I. Sachpazidis

1,2

, R.

Wiehle

1,2

, S. Kirste

2,3

, V. Drendel

2,4

, M. Mix

2,5

, F.

Schiller

2,5

, P. Mavroidis

6,7

, P.T. Meyer

2,5

, A.L. Grosu

2,3

, D.

Baltas

1,2

1

Medical Center University of Freiburg - Faculty of

Medicine - University of Freiburg, Division of Medical

Physics - Department of Radiation Oncology, Freiburg,

Germany

2

German Cancer Consortium DKTK, Partner Site Freiburg,

Freiburg, Germany

3

Medical Center University of Freiburg - Faculty of

Medicine - University of Freiburg, Department of

Radiation Oncology, Freiburg, Germany

4

Medical Center University of Freiburg - Faculty of

Medicine - University of Freiburg, Department of

Pathology, Freiburg, Germany

5

Medical Center University of Freiburg - Faculty of

Medicine - University of Freiburg, Department of Nuclear

Medicine, Freiburg, Germany

6

University of North Carolina, Department of Radiation

Oncology, North Carolina, USA

7

Karolinska Institutet - Stockholm University,

Department of Medical Radiation Physics, Stockholm,

Sweden

Purpose or Objective

The goal of this work is to show the technical feasibility

and to evaluate the normal tissue complication probability

(NTCP) and the tumor control probability (TCP) of the

intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) dose

painting technique using

68

Ga-HBED-CC PSMA-PET/CT in

patients with primary prostate cancer (PCa).

Material and Methods

We studied 10 RT plans of PCa patients having PSMA-

PET/CT scans prior to radical prostatectomy. One contour

was semi automatically generated for each patient on the

basis of the 30% of SUVmax within the prostate (GTV-PET).

For each patient, two IMRT plans were generated: PLAN

77

,

which consisted of whole-prostate radiation therapy to 77

Gy in 2.2 Gy per fraction; PLAN

95

, which consisted of

whole-prostate RT to 77 Gy in 2.2 Gy per fraction, and a

simultaneous integrated boost to the GTV-PET to 95 Gy in

2.71 Gy per fraction. The feasibility of these plans was

judged by their ability to reach prescription doses while

adhering to the FLAME trial protocol. Comparisons of TCPs

based on co-registered histology after prostatectomy

(TCP-histo) and normal tissue complication probabilities

(NTCP) for rectum and bladder were carried out between

the plans.

Results

Prescription doses were reached for all patients plans

while adhering to dose constraints. The mean doses on

GTV-histo for [Plan

77

and Plan

95

] were 75.8±0.3 Gy and

96.9±1 Gy, respectively. In addition, TCP-histo values for

Plan

77

and Plan

95

were 70±7 %, and 95.7±2 %, respectively.

PLAN

95

had significantly higher TCP-histo (p<0.0001)

values than PLAN

77

. There were no significant differences

in rectal (p=0.563) and bladder (p=0.3) NTCPs between

the 2 plans.

Conclusion

IMRT dose painting for primary PCa using

68

Ga-HBED-CC

PSMA-PET/CT was technically feasible. A dose escalation

on GTV-PET resulted in significantly higher TCPs without

higher NTCPs.

PO-0825 Multi-scenario sampling in robust proton

therapy treatment planning

E. Sterpin

1

, A. Barragan

2

, K. Souris

2

, J. Lee

2

1

KU Leuven, Department of Oncology, Leuven, Belgium

2

Université catholique de Louvain, Molecular imaging-

radiotherapy and oncology, Brussels, Belgium

Purpose or Objective

Beam specific PTVs (BSPTV) or robust optimizers are

superior to conventional PTVs for ensuring robustness of

proton therapy treatments. In these planning strategies,

realizations ('scenarios”) of a few types of uncertainties

are simulated: errors in patient setup, CT HU conversion

to stopping powers, and, more recently, breathing

motion. However, baseline shifts of mobile targets should

also be taken into account, which complicates the

sampling of the space of possible scenarios. We compare