Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  865 / 1082 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 865 / 1082 Next Page
Page Background

S849

ESTRO 36 2017

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

therapy.

Conclusion

We found significant correlations between the occurence

of early toxicities and dose-volume parameters of

associated organs at risk for patients with primary brain

tumours or prostate cancer receiving proton therapy. A

reduction of NTCP could be predicted for proton therapy

based on comparative treatment planning. After

validation, these results may be used to identify patients

who are likely to benefit most from proton therapy, as

suggested by the model-based approach [1].

[1] Langendijk JA et al. (2013) Radiother Oncol 107, 267 -

273.

EP-1596 Developing and validating a survival prediction

model for NSCLC patients using distributed learning

A. Jochems

1

, T. Deist

1

, I. El-Naqa

2

, M. Kessler

2

, C. Mayo

2

,

J. Reeves

2

, S. Jolly

2

, M. Matuszak

2

, R. Ten Haken

2

, J. Van

Soes

1

, C. Oberije

1

, C. Faivre-Finn

3

, G. Price

3

, P. Lambin

1

,

A. Dekker

1

1

MAASTRO Clinic, Radiotherapy, Maastricht, The

Netherlands

2

University of Michigan, Radiation oncology, Ann-Arbor,

USA

3

The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic

Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom

Purpose or Objective

The golden standard for survival prediction in NSCLC

patients, the TNM stage system, is of limited quality for

patients receiving (chemo)radiotherapy[1]. In this work,

we develop an up-to-date predictive model for survival

prediction based on a large volume of patients using a big

data distributed learning approach. Distributed learning is

defined as learning from multiple patient datasets without

these data leaving their respective hospitals.

Furthermore, we compare performance of our model to a

TNM stage based model. We demonstrate that the TNM

stage system performs poorly on the validation cohorts,

whereas our model performs significantly above the

chance level.

Material and Methods

Clinical data from 1299 lung cancer patients, treated with

curative intent with chemoradiation (CRT) or radiotherapy

(RT) alone were collected and stored in 3 different cancer

institutes. Two-year post-treatment survival was chosen

as the endpoint. Data from two institutes (1152 patients

at Institute 1 and 147 at Institute 2) was used to develop

the model while data from the 3

rd

institute (207 patients

at Institute 3) was used for model validation.

A Bayesian network model using clinical and dosimetric

variables was adapted for distributed learning (watch the

animation: link censored). The Institute 1 cohort data is

publicly available at (link censored) and the developed

models can be found at (link censored).

Results

A Bayesian network (BN) structure was determined based

on expert advice and can be observed in figure 1. Variables

included in the final model were TNM stage, age,

performance status, and total tumor dose. The BN model

has an AUC of 0.67 (95% CI: 0.59–0.75) on the external

validation set and an AUC of 0.65 on a 5-fold cross-

validation on the training data. A model based on TNM

stage performed with an AUC of 0.49 (95% CI: 0.39-0.59)

on the validation set.

Conclusion

The distributed learning model outperformed the TNM

stage based model for predicting 2-year survival in a

cohort of NSCLC patients in an external validation set (AUC

0.67 vs. 0.49). This approach enables learning of

prediction models from multiple hospitals while avoiding

many boundaries associated with sharing data. We believe

that Distributed learning is the future of Big data in health

care.

References

[1] Dehing-Oberije C. et al. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

2008;70:1039–44. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.07.2323.

EP-1597 Focal dose escalation in prostate cancer with

PSMA-PET/CT and MRI: planning study based on

histology

C. Zamboglou

1

, I. Sachpazidis

2

, K. Koubar

2

, V. Drendel

3

,

M. Werner

3

, H.C. Rischke

1

, M. Langer

4

, F. Schiller

5

, T.

Krauss

4

, R. Wiehle

2

, P.T. Meyer

5

, A.L. Grosu

1

, D. Baltas

2

1

Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Department of

Radiation Oncology, Freiburg, Germany

2

Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Division of

Medical Physics- Department of Radiation Oncology,

Freiburg, Germany

3

Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Department of

Pathology, Freiburg, Germany

4

Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Department of

Radiology, Freiburg, Germany

5

Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Department of

Nuclear Medicine, Freiburg, Germany

Purpose or Objective

First studies could show an increase in sensitivity when

primary prostate cancer (PCa) was detected by addition of

MRI and PSMA PET/CT information. On the other side the

highest specificity was achieved when the intersection

volume between MRI and PSMA PET/CT was considered.

Aim of this study was to demonstrate the technical

feasibility and to evaluate the tumor control probability

(TCP) and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP)

of IMRT dose painting using combined

68

Ga-HBED-CC PSMA-

PET/CT and multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) information in

patients with primary PCa.

Material and Methods

7 patients (5 intermediate + 2 high risk) with biopsy-

proven primary PCa underwent

68

Ga-HBED-CC-PSMA

PET/CT and mpMRI followed by prostatectomy. Resected

prostates were scanned by ex-vivo CT in a localizer and

prepared for histopathology. PCa was delineated on

histologic slices and matched to ex-vivo CT to obtain GTV-

histo. Ex-vivo CT including GTV-histo and MRI data were

matched to in-vivo CT(PET). Contours based on MRI (GTV-

MRI, consensus volume by two experienced radiologist),

PSMA PET (GTV-PET, semiautomatic using 30% of SUVmax

within the prostate) or the combination of both (GTV-

union/-intersection) were created. Three IMRT plans were

generated for each patient: PLAN77, which consisted of

whole-prostate radiation therapy to 77 Gy in 2.2 Gy per

fraction; PLAN95, which consisted of whole-prostate RT to

77 Gy in 2.2 Gy per fraction, and a simultaneous

integrated boost to the GTV-union (Plan95

union

)/-

intersection (Plan95

intersection

) to 95 Gy in 2.71 Gy per

fraction. The feasibility of these plans was judged by their

ability to reach prescription doses while adhering to the

FLAME trial protocol. TCPs based on co-registered

histology after prostatectomy (TCP-histo), and normal

tissue complication probabilities (NTCP) for rectum and

bladder were compared between the plans.

Results