Previous Page  401 / 462 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 401 / 462 Next Page
Page Background

GAZETTE

DECEMBER 1991

Opening Message f r om t he

President

3 85

Law Society Comm i t t e es 1 9 91 - 1 9 92 3 87 Equal T r ea tmen t, Married Women and Social We l f a re Rights 3 91 Reflections on A t l an ta and Brussels 3 97

Lawbrief

3 99

Need for Comp r ehens i ve

Scheme of Civil Legal Aid 4 0 3

People & Places

4 05

Valuation for CAT and

S t amp Du ty Purposes

4 07

Book Reviews

4 15

Solicitors Bill

Domi na t es A GM 4 17 Practice Notes 4 19

Annual Report of t he

Disciplinary Comm i t t ee

4 21

Techno l ogy News 4 24

Professional I n f o rma t i on

4 2 5

*

Editor:

Barbara Cahalane

Committee:

Eamonn G. Hall, Chairman

Maeve Hayes, Vice-Chairman

John F. Buckley

Gerard Griffin

Elma Lynch

Justin McKenna

Michael O'Mahony

Noel C. Ryan

Eva Tobin

Advertising:

Seán Ó hOisín. Telephone: 305236

Fax: 307860

Printing:

Turner's Printing Co. Ltd., Longford.

The views expressed in this publication,

save where otherwise indicated, are the

views of the contributors and not

necessarily the views of the Council of

the Society.

The appearance of an advertisement in

this publication does not necessarily

indicate approval by the Society for the

product or service advertised.

Published at Blackhall Place, Dublin 7

Tel.: 710711. Telex: 31219. Fax: 710704.

A

J f

t

INCORPORATE

D

|

f | / L I

L

LAWSOCIETY

hH / r I Ir

ofireland

l Í H i h H

I

I

Vol. 85 No. 10 December 1991

Viewpoint

Legal Controls on Solicitors

Remuneration are Anti-Competitive

Through the medium of the

Competition Act, 1991, the Minister

for Industry and Commerce, Mr.

O'Malley, has sought to introduce

new competition rules one of the

objectives of which is to outlaw

concerted practices or anything in

the nature of price fixing arrang-

ments. These new rules apply

across the board and will impinge

on the professions, including the

legal profession. While it remains to

be seen precisely what the impact

of the Competition Act will be on

the legal profession, one inter-

pretation of it is that it will prevent

Bar Associations from recommend-

ing mi n imum fees to their

members. It might also have

implications for the Law Society

itself in so far as the Society

promulgates guideline rates for

particular legal services.

Whatever its e f f ect on legal

services, the Competition Act was

intended to herald a new era of

compe t i t i on, impo r t i ng

into

domes t ic law some of the

principles of the Treaty of Rome,

and ensuring that there was real

and genuine competition in the

marketplace in the supply of goods

and services. For that reason, the

solicitors' profession in Ireland

might well have expected that the

new competition rules would have

meant an end to legal controls on

solicitors' remuneration. On exam-

ination of the Competition Act,

however, it transpires that the

competition rules do not affect any

statutory provisions and, conse-

quently, notwithstanding the new

spirit of competition that has been

ushered in by the Act, the full

panoply of legal controls on

solicitors

remuneration

are

untouched.

The preparation of a new Solicitors

Bill afforded another opportunity to

the Government to show that their

c omm i tment to the ideal of

compe t i t i on was all t hat it

purported to be. Close examination

of the Bill reveals a number of

provisions that, once again, are

consistent with the concept of a

free market situation. There is, for

example, a provision in the Bill

which prohibits the Society from

preventing solicitors charging less

than the current scale fee for any

particular service; there are

provisions which will introduce

competition from banks and trust

corporations in the area of probate

work and which will also provide

competition from banks in relation

to conveyancing. Moreover, there is

a provision controlling the manner

in which solicitor and client fees

may be charged and, to cap it all,

the Law Society will be given a

statutory role in relation to dealing

with complaints about solicitors

who overcharge their clients. When

one takes into accoun t, in

conjunction with the foregoing, the

existing system whereby a client

can have a Taxing Master in the

High Court or a County Registrar in

the Circuit Court adjudicate on the

fairness of solicitor's bill of costs

one would have thought that there

was an adequate infrastructure to

ensure that the forces of com-

petition could operate and ade-

(Cont'd overleaf)

383