Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  47 / 88 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 47 / 88 Next Page
Page Background

47

strategies) of the South Caucasus countries have an

all-inclusive and adequate appreciation of climate

change. Furthermore, climate change tends to focus

on mitigation rather than adaptation measures.

Notwithstanding this, there is a clear recognition

by the national governments in the region of the

vulnerability of the population, economy and

infrastructure to natural disasters or other extreme

events caused by climate change.

Armenia

Armenia approved its Sustainable Development

Strategy in 2008 (Government of the Republic of

Armenia 2008b). The document underlines the

vulnerability of water resources to climate change

and recommends the creation of a programme to

protect national water resources, regulate river flows

and ensure availability and rational use of water to

prevent possible conflict among water users and

that the amount of water and water take regimes are

adequate for recovery. About 80 per cent of Armenia

is exposed to different degrees of land degradation

and desertification. To address this, the Sustainable

Development Strategy acknowledges anthropogenic

and climate-induced impacts on land resources and

calls for measures to prevent soil degradation and

desertification processes. In addition, the strategy

considers spatial development and planning as

a tool for balanced national development, while

managed urban development is seen as a mechanism

for reducing the impact of geological hazards. The

strategy also accords special status to mountain

populations and stresses the need to provide support

to economic activities in these regions. Nevertheless,

the strategy is lacking full-scale linkages between

climate change and overall sustainable development.

The country’s comprehensive and detailed Poverty

Reduction Strategy (2003) has 2015 as its endpoint.

Most of the targets within the strategy are for 2015,

and the country has yet to evaluate howwell it tackled

the identified priorities, including issues related

to populations in mountain regions and natural

disaster risk reduction mechanisms – for example,

one of strategy’s goals was the “Development of

a targeted system of privileges, discounts and

allowances in the earthquake zone, near-border,

mountainous and high mountainous regions and

small communities” (p. 131). Implementation of

this goal foresaw the replacement of a government-

funded compensation scheme for damages

caused by natural disasters by an insurance-based

mechanism co-financed by the state, farmers and

private insurance companies (Government of the

Republic of Armenia 2003). Such an approach to

risk reduction was considered innovative in 2003

when the strategy was developed.

The environmental protection section of the strategy

covers issues like forest and land degradation and

water shortages, however there is no reference to

climate change which exacerbates these issues.

Azerbaijan

The year 2012 saw the adoption of the Azerbaijan

2020 Development Concept: A Look into the

Future (President of Azerbaijan 2012). It covered

the main strategic goals of development policy in

all areas of life in the country, and is to be achieved

through state programmes. The concept states:

“As a manifestation of the environmental balance

on the planetary scale, climate change and global

warming are related to processes that can cause

natural disasters (rivers bursting their banks,

flooding of entire villages and cities, precipitation

much higher than the norm, avalanches, etc.). All

these are factors that directly affect the economic and

social life of the country and need to be taken into

account in the process of preparing necessary policy

measures. The experience of recent years shows that

in order to effectively fight natural disasters and their

consequences, the state should prioritise relevant

activities in emergencies and the establishment of

rapid reaction mechanisms for the social security

of the population in such situations” (President of

Azerbaijan 2012). Desertification processes and land

degradation, however, are highlighted in the context

of anthropogenic stress and contamination, while

forest restoration is seen within the context of air

pollution. It underlines that the country has limited

water resources with the least amount of water per

area per capita in the South Caucasus region. This

issue is, however, not considered to be at threat from

climate change, but rather at threat from intensive

contamination of freshwater sources that emanate

from neighbouring countries.

Another of Azerbaijan’s development programmes

is the State Programme on Poverty Reduction

and Sustainable Development, which emphasises

the need to “reduce the negative impact of climate

change on ecosystems and the economy”. In

addition, the document states the following: “Under

overall management of mountainous and coastal

ecosystems, creation of manufacturing facilities that

do not require intensive use of natural resources will

be supported in the mountainous and coastal areas

to improve the living standards and employment

opportunities of the local people” (President of

Azerbaijan 2008a). It also states that technical and

financial assistance will be provided in order to

improve the condition of mountain and coastal

area ecosystems that have suffered substantial

damage. Therefore, the statement links the social and

economic growth of mountain populations with the

protection of mountain ecosystems.

Another important aspect, which is tackled by

the programme, is protection of the agricultural

sector from natural disasters through promotion