Background Image
Previous Page  41 / 72 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 41 / 72 Next Page
Page Background

IRON ORE

August 2015

MODERN MINING

39

The Canga camp of Rio

Tinto’s Simandou project in

Guinea (photo: Rio Tinto).

through the production of lump products.”

Kumba also announced in July that it had

instituted closing procedures for its

Thabazimbi

mine in Limpopo Province, by far the smallest

of its three mines. It has given several reasons

for this decision including the fact that the

mine is now more than 80 years old and has

– over the past 15 years – had its closure post-

poned six times; difficult mining conditions;

high operating costs due to high waste stripping

requirements; and a recent slope failure. One

suspects, however, there might have been some

chance of keeping the mine operating if the iron

ore price environment were more buoyant.

Kumba and Assmang (which owns the

Beeshoek and Khumani mines in the Northern

Cape) are the two main players in South Africa’s

iron ore mining industry but there are several

aspirants, among them Ferrum Crescent, listed

on the ASX and AIM, which has the

Moonlight

project in Limpopo Province, and AIM-listed

Ferrex, which is developing the 1,8 Mt/a

Malelane

project. Ferrex announced earlier this

year that Malelane had been placed on hold

because of the low iron ore price (it is now con-

centrating its energies on its Nayega manganese

project in northern Togo) but Ferrum Crescent

appears to be hard at work on the development

of Moonlight, now in the BFS phase.

The project involves the mining and ben-

eficiation of the Moonlight magnetite deposit

– which was explored in the 1980s and 90s by

Iscor – to produce a high-grade concentrate for

transport to a pellet manufacturing facility at

or near the town of Thabazimbi for the pro-

duction of 6 Mt/a of Direct Reduction (DR) and

blast furnace grade iron pellets for export or

domestic sale.

InMay this year, FerrumCrescent announced

it had signed an MoU with Principle Monarchy

Investments (PMI) – described as “a BEE con-

trolled South African company with extensive

commercial interests in South Africa.” In terms

of the MoU, PMI will acquire a 39 % stake in

the project for a consideration of R142 million,

with the incoming funds to be directed towards

the BFS, with the next key stages to include

large scale pit design and sampling work and

assessment of the need for a bulk sample, as

well as definitive metallurgical testing for full

process design. In its latest quarterly report

(issued at the end of July), Ferrum Crescent said

it was expecting the first R2 million interim

funding payment shortly (upon receipt of

which the MoU will become legally binding).

A major advantage that South African proj-

ects have as opposed to those further north

in Africa is that (current power constraints

notwithstanding) they have access to gener-

ally good infrastructure. In the rest of Africa,

developing iron ore deposits often means

that mining companies have to address huge

infrastructure deficits. This is the case with

Sundance’s

Mbalam-Nabeba

project, for exam-

ple, which – to get into Stage 1 production of

35 Mt/a of Direct Shipping Ore (DSO) – needs

a 510 km rail line from Mbarga in Cameroon

(and a 70 km rail spur connecting to Nabeba

A major

advantage that

South African

projects have

as opposed to

those further

north in Africa

is that (current

power constraints

notwithstanding)

they have access

to generally good

infrastructure.