Previous Page  84 / 88 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 84 / 88 Next Page
Page Background

Reading Matters

You Matter

|

82

|

Reading Matters | Volume 16 • Winter 2016 |

scira.org CLICK HERE TO RETURN TO TABLE OF CONTENTS

offer suggestions for both early childhood educators and their

teacher educators. Addressing this issue from both perspectives,

and providing the reader with recommendations for practice,

allows us to contend with theory and practice in dynamic ways.

The Pedagogical Challenge:

Going Beyond the Read-Aloud

As participants of the Barbara A. Sizemore Urban Education

Conference, we collaborated on a poster presentation that

highlighted children’s literature where the main characters

negotiated issues of poverty or homelessness. Our presentation

focused on three realistic fiction picture books:

Gettin’ through

Thursday

by Melrose Cooper,

Those Shoes

by Maribeth Boelts,

and

The Lunch Thief

by Anne Bromley.

Gettin’ through Thursday

by Melrose Cooper is about a young boy named André whose

family finds creative ways to make ends meet until payday (Friday).

Those Shoes

by Maribeth Boelts features a little boy named

Jeremy who desperately wants a pair of sneakers that almost

all of his classmates have; he saves his money and buys a pair at

the second-hand store but they are too small. Jeremy decides to

anonymously give the too small shoes to a classmate who needs

them more.

The Lunch Thief

by Anne Bromley is the story of a boy

named Rafael who has his lunch stolen repeatedly. He discovers

that the new boy, Kevin, has been stealing his lunch. Kevin recently

lost his home in a wildfire and is living out of a hotel. By the end

of the story, Rafael decides to share his plentiful lunch with Kevin.

Additionally, our presentation included a handout aimed at

early childhood classroom practitioners. The handout offered

teaching strategies and ideas for using multicultural children’s

literature in urban schools. We supported the strategies and

ideas highlighted in the handout with scholarship addressing

the use of social justice-themed children’s literature to meet

standards-based goals in early childhood classrooms (i.e.

Common Core, see Enriquez & Shulman-Kumin, 2014).

A Pedagogical Challenge for Both

ClassroomTeachers and University

Professors

The discussion following our poster presentation at the

conference led us to further reflect and interrogate our own

practices. We agree that “teachers [and teacher educators] can

use read-alouds to develop children’s background knowledge,

stimulate their interest in high-quality literature, increase

their comprehension skills, and foster critical thinking” (Meller,

Richardson, & Amos Hatch, 2015, p. 102). For instance, a classroom

teacher can facilitate discussion with young learners about a

character who couldn’t afford to buy “those shoes,” a character

whose family had a hard time “gettin’ through Thursdays,”

or a character who stole someone else’s lunch because he

was hungry and homeless. However, we argue that doing

so—as merely an academic exercise in the classroom—does

little to critically engage students (at both levels) with the

issues at hand. Thus, there is a need to go beyond the read-

aloud; a need to “do more” as part of socially-just practices in

education (Wade, 2000; Dever, Sorenson, & Broderick, 2005).

The pedagogical challenge of going beyond a read-aloud—that

is, digging deeper and doing more—is important for two main

reasons. First, it is critical that both early childhood and university

students gain a more nuanced understanding of poverty and

homelessness as a relevant and significant local and global issue.

As noted by Kelley and Darragh (2011), poverty and homelessness

are often misrepresented in realistic fiction children’s picture books:

…These often inaccurate and unrealistic portrayals may

give children false perceptions of the world…Children

reading these books may gain the misunderstanding

that middle- and upper-class families are the norm,

and that all people who are poor do not know how to

manage their money…Moreover, many picture books

that have such characters who are poor fail to identify

the various causes of poverty, such as job loss and low

minimum wage. (p. 266)

Second, it is crucial that we, as teachers and teacher educators,

do not “reinforce the notion that people can pull themselves up

by their bootstraps, and that poverty is an individual problem

that can be solved with some effort by individuals, rather than

poverty is a national, structural, and systemic problem” (Kelley

& Darragh, 2011, p. 277). For these two reasons, it is important

to extend realistic fiction picture books about poverty and

homelessness in a critical and strategic manner that is not diluted

or oblivious to deeper nuances around the topic. So then, what

else, besides a read-aloud and a class discussion, can a teacher and

a teacher educator do with social justice-themed picture books?

Pedagogical Challenge: Going

Beyond a Pedestrian Approach to

Picture Books

A longstanding and growing body of critical literacy scholarship

provides insights for how to create authentic learning experiences

where children are able to walk in the shoes of the characters

from the book. In order to do more and allow students to walk

in the shoes of the characters that they encounter in picture

books, critical literacy scholars remind us that it is important to

model and promote the interrogation about why these social

justice issues occur in both early childhood and teacher education

classrooms. Such interrogation examines how characters and

issues are depicted in realistic fiction picture books. That is,

students can ask questions to challenge stereotypical depictions,

and move toward critical civic engagement. In the following

passage, Short (2011) discusses how to approach issues such

as poverty, via children’s literature in our classrooms:

Instead of a “give the helpless a handout” approach, civic

engagement involves challenging stereotypes of those

who live in poverty, developing an understanding of

those who live in poverty, developing an understanding

of the complex causes of poverty, introducing activists

who work at these causes, and removing the stigma of

poverty. (p. 57)

In both elementary and university classrooms, it is important