Previous Page  15 / 68 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 15 / 68 Next Page
Page Background

Literacy

www.speechpathologyaustralia.org.au

ACQ

Volume 11, Number 2 2009

77

Language

comprehension

Word

identification

Print

processing

Silent reading

comprehension

This article

has been

peer-

reviewed

Sally Clendon

(top) and

Karen Erickson

Keywords

augmentative

and

alternative

communica­

tion (AAC)

complex

communica­

tion needs

literacy

no longer restricted to the vocabulary words that others

deem important, and can achieve independence in their

communication. This paper will discuss some of the key

principles that need to be employed in order to assist these

individuals to maximise their literacy potential and acquire the

literacy skills needed to become effective in both face-to-

face and written communication.

Providing comprehensive literacy

instruction

Beginning literacy instructional programs must be

comprehensive and address all of the constructs involved in

reading and writing. Cunningham’s (1993) Whole-to-Part

Model of Silent Reading Comprehension highlights the

constructs that are believed to underlie successful silent

reading comprehension and comprise comprehensive

reading instruction. These constructs, as depicted in figure

1, are word identification, language comprehension, and

print processing (see Cunningham, [1993], or Erickson,

Koppenhaver, & Cunningham, [2006] for a detailed

description of these constructs).

Historically, literacy programs designed for individuals

with developmental disabilities have tended to focus on

only a few constructs. For many years, for example, there

was a prevailing belief that individuals with developmental

disabilities, particularly those with cognitive disabilities,

could be taught to read sight words, but that they could not

learn to decode words using phonics-based strategies. The

literacy instruction that these individuals received tended to

focus on whole-word recognition and limited attention was

placed on the internal make-up of words. Consequently, they

This article outlines some of the key principles

underlying effective literacy instruction for

individuals with complex communication

needs. These principles include: (a) the need

for a comprehensive approach to instruction

that addresses all of the constructs involved in

literacy learning; (b) the need for direct

intervention that focuses on an individual’s

area of greatest need; (c) the need to address

language and literacy simultaneously; and (d)

the need to maintain high levels of cognitive

engagement while offering repetition with

variety.

L

iteracy skills are extremely important in today’s society

and most would agree that being able to read and

write effectively is essential for learning, personal

development, and employment success. Perhaps there

is no other group of individuals who highlight the power

of literacy more compellingly than those with complex

communication needs. These individuals are unable to use

speech as their primary mode of communication and instead

rely on the introduction of some form of augmentative and

alternative communication (AAC) system. This may be an

unaided system such as sign, a low-tech system such as a

communication book or board, or a high-tech system such

as a computerised AAC device. Whichever system is used,

literacy skills are critical in AAC because until individuals with

complex communication needs learn to spell conventionally,

it is extremely difficult for them to communicate words or

messages beyond those that are available to them in their

AAC system (Clendon, 2006).

Today computerised AAC devices have the capacity to

store large amounts of vocabulary. Programming every

possible word that an individual might need, however, is

problematic as the vocabulary becomes difficult to organise,

manage, and access (Erickson & Clendon, 2009). Instead,

it is common practice for educators, speech pathologists,

and parents to try and predict which words are sufficiently

important to warrant inclusion. Unfortunately, despite their

best intentions, the vocabulary words they select are often

inappropriate for the individual’s personality, situation,

and developmental profile (Carlson, 1981). In contrast,

when individuals with complex communication needs

develop conventional reading and writing skills, they are

Literacy instruction for

individuals with complex

communication needs

Sally Clendon and Karen Erickson

Figure 1. A simplified view of Cunningham’s

whole-to-part model