Previous Page  8 / 68 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 8 / 68 Next Page
Page Background

70

ACQ

Volume 11, Number 2 2009

ACQ

uiring knowledge in speech, language and hearing

training for SPs and teachers, various definitions of literacy,

limited knowledge about the recent history of literacy

research, and the strong influence of opinion and ideology in

this area. SPs need to be aware that a chasm exists

between their “skills analysis” view and the broader

sociocultural views of the literacy “big picture”. Most

importantly, SPs need to be clear about their own beliefs

about literacy, and respect that others may hold different

beliefs. SPs need to be part of the important discussions

taking place in education (Ehren, 2005), but they need to

demonstrate their relevance within the broad context of

educational policy and practice. An understanding of the “big

picture” of literacy can assist speech pathologists to

overcome some of the barriers to negotiating effectively with

educationalists about their role in literacy.

Acknowledgements

This article was adapted from Walsh (2007) Why is the

knowledge base of SLPs not more widely accessed to

enhance literacy outcomes?

Talkabout

, 20 (1): 2–8. Used

with permission of the Department of Education and Training

Queensland.

References

Alexander, P. A., & Fox, E. (2004). A historical perspective on

reading research and practice. In R.B. Ruddell, & N.J. Unrau

(Eds.),

Theoretical models and processes of reading

(pp.

33–68). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

American Federation of Teachers. (1999). Teaching

reading is rocket science; What expert teachers of reading

should know and be able to do. AFT: Washington DC.

Retrieved January 2009 from

http://www.aft.org/pubs-

reports/downloads/teachers/rocketsci.pdf

American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

(ASHA). (2002). Knowledge and skills needed by speech-

language pathologists with respect to reading and

writing in children and adolescents.

ASHA 2002 Desk

Reference

, 3. Retrieved January 2009 from http://www.

asha.org/NR/rdonlyres/7EA339AB-A7EB-453D-9B09-

ECCBB50C6ADB/0/v3KSReadingWritingChildren.pdf

Anderson, R. C. (1977). The notion of schemata and

the educational enterprise. In R.C. Anderson, R.J. Spiro,

& W.E. Montague (Eds.),

Schooling and the acquisition of

knowledge

(pp. 415–431). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Carroll, J. (2006). Phonological awareness: Investigating

the phonological awareness skills of New Zealand primary

schools’ educators.

SET: Research information for Teachers

,

no. 3. New Zealand Council for Education Research.

Chipman, S.F. (1993). Gazing once more into the silicon

chip: Who’s revolutionary now? In S.P. Lajoie & S.J. Derry

(Eds.),

Computers as cognitive tools

(pp. 341–367).

Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Chomsky, N. (1975).

Reflections on language

. New York:

Pantheon Books.

Clay, M. M. (1976).

Young fluent readers: What can they

teach us?

London: Heinemann.

Coltheart, M. (2005). Analysing developmental disorders

of reading.

Advances in Speech-Language Pathology

,

7

(2):

49–57.

Coltheart, M., & Prior, M. (2007).

Learning to read in

Australia

. Occasional Paper 1/2007 Policy Paper no. 6.

Canberra: The Academy of the Social Sciences in Australia.

Retrieved January 2009 from

http://decs.sa.gov.au/

wakefield/files/links/Learning_to_read.pdf

De Lemos, M. (2002).

Closing the gap between research

and practice: Foundations for the acquisition of literacy

.

Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.

Department of Education, Science & Training. (2005).

Teaching reading: Report and recommendations

. National

Inquiry into the Teaching of Reading. Commonwealth of

Australia: Canberra. Retrieved April 2008 from http://www.

dest.gov.au/nitl/report.htm

Dewey, J. (1991).

How we think

. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus

Books. (Original work published 1910)

Education Queensland. (2000).

Literate futures: Report of

the Literacy Review for Queensland State Schools

. Brisbane:

The State of Queensland (Department of Education).

Education Queensland. (2002).

Literate futures: Reading

.

Brisbane: The State of Queensland (Department of

Education).

Mentoring Program

Share and Develop Skills –

Surprise Yourself with New Insights

Looking to maximise your learning and build on professional and personal capacities in 2009? – then

Speech Pathology Australia’s Mentoring Program is just the thing for you. Providing an opportunity for

reflective practice, development of new skills and increased knowledge and networks for both mentees

and mentors.

Anyone with two or more years experience in their work role can register as a mentor – you do not need

to be an expert! With many new graduates now registering for the program, mentors are in high demand.

We’d love to hear from mentors to match with these keen members.

On the other hand, if you are a new graduate recently employed, changing your field of practice, new to an

area, embarking on a research project, new to management or isolated in a sole position, why not register

as a mentee to gain some extra support.

The Association is please announce it now has a new brochure about the Mentoring Program. This

brochure is now available via the Association website or by contacting the Association directly.

For more detailed information and registration forms please check out the Mentoring Program information

on the website.

www.speechpathologyaustralia.org.au