![Show Menu](styles/mobile-menu.png)
![Page Background](./../common/page-substrates/page0008.jpg)
70
ACQ
Volume 11, Number 2 2009
ACQ
uiring knowledge in speech, language and hearing
training for SPs and teachers, various definitions of literacy,
limited knowledge about the recent history of literacy
research, and the strong influence of opinion and ideology in
this area. SPs need to be aware that a chasm exists
between their “skills analysis” view and the broader
sociocultural views of the literacy “big picture”. Most
importantly, SPs need to be clear about their own beliefs
about literacy, and respect that others may hold different
beliefs. SPs need to be part of the important discussions
taking place in education (Ehren, 2005), but they need to
demonstrate their relevance within the broad context of
educational policy and practice. An understanding of the “big
picture” of literacy can assist speech pathologists to
overcome some of the barriers to negotiating effectively with
educationalists about their role in literacy.
Acknowledgements
This article was adapted from Walsh (2007) Why is the
knowledge base of SLPs not more widely accessed to
enhance literacy outcomes?
Talkabout
, 20 (1): 2–8. Used
with permission of the Department of Education and Training
Queensland.
References
Alexander, P. A., & Fox, E. (2004). A historical perspective on
reading research and practice. In R.B. Ruddell, & N.J. Unrau
(Eds.),
Theoretical models and processes of reading
(pp.
33–68). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
American Federation of Teachers. (1999). Teaching
reading is rocket science; What expert teachers of reading
should know and be able to do. AFT: Washington DC.
Retrieved January 2009 from
http://www.aft.org/pubs-reports/downloads/teachers/rocketsci.pdf
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
(ASHA). (2002). Knowledge and skills needed by speech-
language pathologists with respect to reading and
writing in children and adolescents.
ASHA 2002 Desk
Reference
, 3. Retrieved January 2009 from http://www.
asha.org/NR/rdonlyres/7EA339AB-A7EB-453D-9B09-ECCBB50C6ADB/0/v3KSReadingWritingChildren.pdf
Anderson, R. C. (1977). The notion of schemata and
the educational enterprise. In R.C. Anderson, R.J. Spiro,
& W.E. Montague (Eds.),
Schooling and the acquisition of
knowledge
(pp. 415–431). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Carroll, J. (2006). Phonological awareness: Investigating
the phonological awareness skills of New Zealand primary
schools’ educators.
SET: Research information for Teachers
,
no. 3. New Zealand Council for Education Research.
Chipman, S.F. (1993). Gazing once more into the silicon
chip: Who’s revolutionary now? In S.P. Lajoie & S.J. Derry
(Eds.),
Computers as cognitive tools
(pp. 341–367).
Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Chomsky, N. (1975).
Reflections on language
. New York:
Pantheon Books.
Clay, M. M. (1976).
Young fluent readers: What can they
teach us?
London: Heinemann.
Coltheart, M. (2005). Analysing developmental disorders
of reading.
Advances in Speech-Language Pathology
,
7
(2):
49–57.
Coltheart, M., & Prior, M. (2007).
Learning to read in
Australia
. Occasional Paper 1/2007 Policy Paper no. 6.
Canberra: The Academy of the Social Sciences in Australia.
Retrieved January 2009 from
http://decs.sa.gov.au/wakefield/files/links/Learning_to_read.pdf
De Lemos, M. (2002).
Closing the gap between research
and practice: Foundations for the acquisition of literacy
.
Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.
Department of Education, Science & Training. (2005).
Teaching reading: Report and recommendations
. National
Inquiry into the Teaching of Reading. Commonwealth of
Australia: Canberra. Retrieved April 2008 from http://www.
dest.gov.au/nitl/report.htmDewey, J. (1991).
How we think
. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus
Books. (Original work published 1910)
Education Queensland. (2000).
Literate futures: Report of
the Literacy Review for Queensland State Schools
. Brisbane:
The State of Queensland (Department of Education).
Education Queensland. (2002).
Literate futures: Reading
.
Brisbane: The State of Queensland (Department of
Education).
Mentoring Program
Share and Develop Skills –
Surprise Yourself with New Insights
Looking to maximise your learning and build on professional and personal capacities in 2009? – then
Speech Pathology Australia’s Mentoring Program is just the thing for you. Providing an opportunity for
reflective practice, development of new skills and increased knowledge and networks for both mentees
and mentors.
Anyone with two or more years experience in their work role can register as a mentor – you do not need
to be an expert! With many new graduates now registering for the program, mentors are in high demand.
We’d love to hear from mentors to match with these keen members.
On the other hand, if you are a new graduate recently employed, changing your field of practice, new to an
area, embarking on a research project, new to management or isolated in a sole position, why not register
as a mentee to gain some extra support.
The Association is please announce it now has a new brochure about the Mentoring Program. This
brochure is now available via the Association website or by contacting the Association directly.
For more detailed information and registration forms please check out the Mentoring Program information
on the website.
www.speechpathologyaustralia.org.au