Previous Page  399 / 406 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 399 / 406 Next Page
Page Background

GAZETTE

JULY/AUGUST1985

could be construed as meaning simply

that the balance of welfare as defined in

Section 2 of the Act of 1964 must be the

sole criterion for the determination by the

Court of the issue as to the custody of the

child. A child over two years of age, as

this infant is, in the dominant or general

custody of persons other than its parents

and continuing in such custody against

the wishes of its parents, cannot be said to

enjoy the right of education by its family

and parents granted by Article 42.1 of the

Constitution.

It was held further that Section 3 of the

Act of 1964 must be construed as

involving a constitutional presumption

that the welfare of the child which is

defined in Section 2 of the Act in terms

identical to those contained in Article

42.1 is to be found within the family

unless the Court is satisfied on the

evidence that there are compelling

reasons why this can not be achieved or

unless the Court is satisfied that the

evidence establishes an exceptional case

where the parents have failed to provide

education for the child and continue to

fail to provide education for the child for

moral or physical reasons.

The Court, allowing the appeal of the

parents, remitted the case to the High

Court to be further considered either on

the evidence as it existed or on such

further evidence as it may consider

material in accordance with the test of

compelling reasons why the welfare of the

child can not be secured to it in the family

unit and by the parents.

The Court dismissed the appeal of the

adopting parents against the order

refusing them relief under Section 3 of the

Act of 1974 which was not pursued by

them. The order restricting the re-regis-

tration of the birth of the child must be set

aside.

M. C. and M. C. -v- K. C. and A. C. and An

Bord Uchtala and An tArd Calraitheóir -

Supreme Court (per Finlay C.J., Griffin,

Hederman, McCarthy, O'Hanlon J.J.

concurring), 27 March, 1985 - unreported.

Damien McHugh

Copies of judgments in the above

cases are available on request from

the Society's Library. The photo-

copying rate is lOp per page.

xxviii