Previous Page  227 / 338 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 227 / 338 Next Page
Page Background

for the present fees of £8 8s. od. for each course of

law lectures and £6 6s. od. for the course of lectures

on bookkeeping, (V) substitute £20 for £17 175. od.,

as the fee for attending the final examination. The

other fees in the schedule are unchanged.

EXAMINATION RESULTS

At the bookkeeping examination for apprentices

to solicitors held on the loth day of June, the follow

ing passed the examination :—

Passed with merit:

i. Desmond J. O'Malley;

2. Michael J. Browne;

3. Maurice R. Curran;

4. Rory M. Hogan;

5.

Thomas K. Smith;

6. Joseph Gilmartin;

7. William S. Geraghty ;

8. Marie P. M. Berkery.

Passed:

Michael E. Binch'y, James J. Dennison,

Ailin A. Gibbons, Peter F. Houlihan, Helen M.

Kirwan, John O. Lee, James J. O'Connor, Roderick

O'Donnell.

19 candidates attended;

16 passed.

FINAL AND SECOND AND THIRD LAW

EXAMINATIONS

The Court of Examiners will consider applications

from apprentices for exemption from certain subjects

at the second and third law examinations in the

following circumstances.

If an apprentice has

passed the first law examination and part i of the

final examination

the Court of Examiners will

consider an application for exemption from papers

4 and 6 at the second law examination. In the case

of an apprentice who has passed the first law

examination and part 2 of the final examination the

Court of Examiners will consider applications for

exemption from papers 7, 10, 12 and 13 at the

second and third law examinations. The decision

on such an application will depend upon the standard

of proficiency shown and is discretionary.

PARLIAMENTARY QUESTION

To ask the Minister for Finance what staff and

machinery are available for stamping deeds in the

stamp office, Dublin Castle, whether there are any

substantial delays at the stamp office counter ;

and,

if so, the cause thereof and if the delays could be

eliminated by the provision of additional staff or

machinery.

—Michael J. O'Higgins.

Answer:

I presume that the Deputy's question

relates only to the facilities provided for persons

who wish to have their documents stamped while

they wait. Two officers are available for checking

the amount of the duty in these cases, and marking

it on the documents to be stamped. One officer,

who operates a single stamping press, is available

for the actual stamping of the documents.

In reply to a question on the 23rd March last, I

explained that the limited accommodation available

on the present site of the Stamping Office does not

allow of any extension of the existing facilities, and

that delays occur when large numbers of callers

present themselves at the same time. Better provision

for personal callers is being made in the plans now

under consideration for the building of new premises

for the Stamping Office.

In the meantime, the Revenue Commissioners are

taking all possible steps to reduce delays

to a

minimum.

Assistance is being provided for the

Stamper so as to enable him to deal more quickly

with the documents presented to him, and assistance

will also be provided for the Marking Officers if

it should become necessary. It is hoped that these

measures will result in a substantial improvement,

but the position will, in any event, be kept under

constant review.

(Ddil Debates, \-jth May,

1960)

FINANCE BILL 1960

The attention ofmembers is directed to the follow

ing sections in the bill as introduced.

Section

9 empowers the Revenue Commissioners to

obtain information about payments made by traders

and others in respect of services rendered bj "persons

not employed by them. The Council are considering

this section in order to see whether any representa

tions are necessary with a view to protecting the

privileges of solicitors and the secrecy of professional

communications in respect of business transacted for

clients.

Section

23 and the second schedule to the Act

raised the exemption limit for the purposes of

estate duty from £2,000 to £5,000.

Section

24 raises the corresponding exemption

limit for legacy and succession duties from £2,000

to £5,000.

Section

25 relates to relief from Estate Duty in a

case of securities brought within the ambit of

section 7 of the Finance Act, 1932, by section 5 of

the Bill.

In such cases relief from Estate Duty will

operate in respect of debts occurring after the

passing of the Bill.

Section

36 deals with the stamp duty on copy

documents issued by District Probate Registries.

It will simplify arrangements for paying the duty

by permitting the use of adhesive stamps instead of

impressed stamps.

Section

38 makes tax relief available in certain

cases where a child was adopted informally. The

section relates to succession and legacy duty and

15