Previous Page  300 / 338 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 300 / 338 Next Page
Page Background

He then ascertained that the client had a brother in

a mental hospital whose existence had not been

disclosed.

Member asked for advice as

to his

professional position particularly as to his obligation

to make this disclosure to the purchaser, the position

of the sureties and his obligations to the Land

Registry who have apparently registered the client

as owner on a misrepresentation made by the latter.

It would appear that no question of privilege can

arise between the client and member having regard

to the fact that the client apparently retained member

as a solicitor for the purpose of committing a fraud.

The Council on a report from a Committee stated

that in their opinion the client should be informed

of the rights of the next-of-kin in the mental home

to share in the estate and that member is obliged to

disclose the mistake to the Registrar of Titles and

to the sureties.

Certificate of discharge of income tax

The Council reconsidered on request the existing

ruling that the work of a solicitor for a vendor in

applying for and obtaining the Section 6 Certificate

is included in the commission scale fee and that no

further charge should be made against the vendor

and that no charge should be made against the

purchaser in respect thereof. In cases in which the

solicitor has to make a return of income tax on behalf

of a client in order to obtain the certificate the

appropriate charge therefore may be made against

the vendor under Schedule 2. The Council decided

to make no change in the existing ruling.

Compensation Fund

On report from the Compensation Fund Com

mittee the Council admitted claims amounting to

£11,863 for payment.

Land Registry Map

A member who acted for a purchaser who bought

under a contract containing a stipulation that the

purchaser would admit the identity of the property

from the muniments of title offered by the vendor,

wrote asking whether it was in accordance with

ordinary conveyancing practice to refuse to furnish

a certified copy of the Land Registry Map. The

Council replied that the matter is one for the parties

under the contract or conditions of sale.

Registry of Deeds searches

Members wrote referring to delays in the Registry

of Deeds in supplying negative searches which make

it impossible or difficult in many cases to complete

a sale in the normal period of one month stipulated

in the contract. Many solicitors are closing on

land searches and member asked for advice as to the

incidence of the additional expense. The matter was

referred to the Dublin Solicitors' Bar Association.

Northern Ireland Commissioners for Oaths

The Council were informed that some district

justices will not accept an affidavit sworn before

a commissioner for oaths in Northern Ireland and

that counsel has advised that they may be correct in

this view having regard to certain provisions in the

District Court Rules. No difficulty arises as regards

affidavits filed in the High Court.

The Council

directed that the matter be referred to the District

Court Rules Committee.

Courts (Establishment and Constitution) Bill,

1959 and Courts (Supplemental Pro

visions) Bill, 1959

The Council on report from the Legislation

Committee considered the provisions of the Bills

and directed that representation should be made

thereon to the Department of Justice.

Commission scale fees on leases

The Costs Committee submitted the following

report:

(i) At the present time as

regards property

registered and unregistered as a whole there are

four different commission scales printed in the

Society's calendar :

Table B is for leases at rack rent

of unregistered land. Table E, is for the same kind

of lease of registered land. Table C is for building

leases and long leases not at rack rent of unregistered

land.

Table F is for the same kind of lease of

registered land. A short lease not at a rack rent,

if there is such a thing, does not fall under any

commission scale fee.

If the subject matter is un

registered land the new Schedule 2 applies ;

if it

is registered land the costs are chargeable by items

under the old Schedule 2.

(ii) The Committee think there should be only

two scales, a higher and a lower scale applicable

equally to the registered and unregistered land. The

present scales for registered land should be adopted.

(iii) The old distinction between leases at rack rent

and leases at less than a rack rent should be abolished.

Instead, a building lease, a lease containing a fine

and a lease for a term greater than thirty five years

should each be charged on the higher scale. All

other leases should be charged on the lower scale.

Civ) The existing practice of the profession as

regards yearly and shorter tenancies should remain,

88