i.e., they should be charged on the lower scale with
discretion to the solicitor to accept a lower fee where
justified.
(v) Differentiation between the fees of the lessor's
and lessee's solicitors is too great. Having regard
to the responsibility thrown on the lessee's solicitor
he should receive a fee equal to seventy five per cent,
of the lessor's solicitor's fee.
(vi) The new Schedule 2 giving the solicitor a
negotiation fee where he negotiates a lease will be
applied to registered land if the Land Registration
Rules Committee adopts the new Schedule 2.
(vii) At common law in the absence of a stipulation
to the contrary the lessee must pay the lessor's costs.
This does not apply to a transaction which is really
a sale effected by way of lease having regard to the
decision of Dixon, J. in Sims
v.
Ilet Ltd. (1960
Calendar, page 576). The Committee are in favour
of a change in the law whereby the parties to any
lease should each pay their own costs. This could
be done only by legislation as has been done in
England.
The Department of Justice should be
asked at an appropriate time to seek legislation to
this effect.
(viii) The Committee are of opinion that the
question of increasing or altering the commission
rates should be postponed until the law has been
altered as recommended in paragraph (vii).
The Council having considered this report decided
that an application should be made in due course to
the Statutory Body under the Solicitors' Remunera
tion General Order, 1881 for a new Order consolidat
ing the Solicitors' Remuneration General Orders,
1884 to 1961 and including an amendment providing
that the commission scale fees for leases of un
registered land shall be the same as
those for
registered land. Consideration of the other matters
mentioned in the Committee's report was postponed
until such time as the law can be amended to provide
that the respective parties to any lease will each pay
their own costs.
Series of leases—reduced charges
A member who acts for a company engaged in the
construction of houses for employees was asked to
prepare a standard form of letting agreement. The
only matters to be inserted will be usual particulars
of the tenant's name, date of letting, amount of
rent, etc. He enquired whether he could charge
reduced fee. The Council stated that there would
be no objection to a reduced charge provided that
(i) Member
reserves
the
copyright
in
the
agreement and the right to charge extra fees
in any case where the work justifies it.
(ii) there should be separate instructions for each
agreement,
(iii) the reduced fees would be charged only in
respect of short leases or letting agreements.
COURTS (SUPPLEMENTAL
PROVISIONS) BILL, 1959
Section 45 of the Bill as introduced proposes to
abolish the present mode of address in Court to the
Chief Justice, Judges and the District Justices and
to substitute a form of address in the Irish language.
The following resolution passed by the General
Council of the Bar of Ireland was received by the
Council of the Society :
It is the opinion of the Council that the provisions
of Section 4 5 of the Courts (Supplemental Provisions)
Bill, 1959, as introduced are objectionable on the
grounds:—
1. That they are inconsistent with the Constitution
and in particular with the provisions of
Articles 8(2) and 34 thereof.
2. That they will unnecessarily interfere with the
traditional and established mode of address in
Court and inevitably tend to confusion and
loss of dignity.
3. Because they would impose an embarrassment
on the professions and the public involving
loss of dignity to the Courts and do a dis
service to
the advancement of the Irish
language and in any event would not be
capable of enforcement.
Further, the Council regret that such an
alteration as now proposed in the procedure
and usage of Court should have been
advocated without prior consultation with
the Bar.
By direction of the Council a letter was written to
the Department of Justice stating that the Council
of the Society support the resolution of the Bar and
further stating that in the opinion of the Council the
mode of address of the judges and other matters of
procedure should be laid down by the statutory
Rules Committees with which
the
judges are
associated and that it is wrong in principle that such
matters should be prescribed by direct statutory
enactment.
PROCEEDINGS
AGAINST
SOLICITORS
By Order made on
zjth
January, 1961 the Chief
Justice directed that the name of John B. Sullivan,
Solicitor of Mallow, County Cork, shall be struck off
the Roll on the ground that he had committed
misconduct as a solicitor.
89