Previous Page  131 / 264 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 131 / 264 Next Page
Page Background

GAZETTE

JULY

under a contract limiting only the length of title to be

shown.

Sub-rules (2) (3) and (4) of Rule 19 provided that the

Registrar might in specific cases accept a certificate by a

solicitor in Form 3 when the market value of the property

did not exceed £8,000 and make the registration without

any further examination of title. This figure of £8,000 was

raised to £20,000 in 1973 and is now £25,000 under the

amending Rules which came into operation on 1st April

1977. These amending Rules (S.I. 89 of 1977) also

prescribed a new form of certificate. It is hoped that the

use of this new certificate will speed the registration of

applications under this Rule.

APPURTENANT RIGHTS

Provision is now make by Section 82 of the Act for the

entry on the Folio of appurtenant rights acquired by

Grant or Court Order attached to the registered lands and

Rule 25(b) sets out the requirements for such an

application.

Only since the passing of the Land Act 1965 has the

Land Commission power to vest appurtenant rights.

Appurtenant rights may be extinguished by law or by

statute or by express or implied release. It is extremely

difficult to establish the extinguishment of such a right by

abandonment. In fact for registration purposes a Court

Order would probably be necessary. The right to take turf

for fuel in a house is not appurtenant to the lands but to

the dwellinghouse situate on the lands. It cannot be

apportioned or severed from the dwellinghouse. Normally

ah easement must be appurtenant to lands and cannot

exist in gross. It is, therefore, necessary to ascertain the

dominant tenement for the benefit of which the easement

exists and to enter the right as a burden on the servient

tenament. There is an exception under Section 69 of the

1964 Act where the right of the Land Commission or

Local Authority to lay pipelines for any purpose may be

registered as a burden.

Rule 28 deals with mines and minerals on applications

for first registration of the ownership of property. Most of

the lands registered under the Registration of Title Acts

were purchased under the various Land Purchase Acts

and roughly speaking those purchased prior to the 1903

Land Act acquired the mines and minerals, and those

purchased subsequently did not.

Rule 30 deals with applications for first registration of

mines and minerals; and of portions of premises such as a

flat or a floor of a house.

If any application for registration includes foreshore

the fact should be stated in the application so that the

Registrar may notify the Minister for Transport and

Power as required by the Act.

Cautions against First Registration may be entered by

persons having an interest in the property (Rules 31 and

32).

DISCHARGE OF EQUITIES

Rules 33 to 37 deal with conversion of Possessory

Title into Absolute Title where the property has been

purchased under the Land Purchase Acts. This is the old

discharge of equities and the Rules are similar to those in

operation for the last thirty years. Note that under Rule

35 the conversion may now be made on a certificate by

the solicitor in Form 15 where the purchase money is

under a certain figure. This figure is now £25,000 after

100

last month's amendment to the Rules. The conversions of

Possessory Title into Absolute or Good Leasehold title

where the property has not been purchased under the

Land Purchase Acts are dealt with in Rules 38 and 39.

There are not many of these applications.

Rules 41 to 44 deal with general provisions as to

conversion of Possessory or Qualified titles.

Rule 45 deals with other examinations of title outside

the Register, e.g. the examination of the title of a lessor

when the ownership of the lease is registered with good

leasehold title, for purpose of noting that it is converted to

Absolute Title.

SECTION 49 APPLICATIONS - SQUATTER'S

RIGHTS

Applications where it is claimed that title has been

acquired by mere possession, hitherto dealt with by the

Courts under Section 52 of the 1891 Act, may now be

made in the Registry. Under Section 49 of the 1964 Act

the Registrar was empowered to register an applicant in

such cases when he is satisfied that the applicant has

acquired the title. Rule 46 prescribes that such

applications should be made in Form 5 or such

modifications as the case may require. If the Registrar is

satisfied with the title he may register the applicant as full

owner of the property with an Absolute, Good Leasehold,

Possessory or Qualified title as the case may require. The

application is usually for an Absolute Title.

In many cases these applications are based on the

supposition that twelve years undisturbed possession is

sufficient for the purpose of registration as full owner with

an Absolute Title on the Freehold Register. In fact, the

land on which the applicant has squatted may be the

subject of a long lease. Even if the property is shown to be

freehold the persons entitled may be under a disability; or

the lands may be in settlement in which case the squatter

may only be acquiring the estate of a tenant for life. In

such cases twelve years possession does not entitle the

applicant to the freehold interest.

It is strictly necessary to show 40 years title by the

applicant or his predecessors and to show who were the

true owners at the date of dispossession, and that their

claim has been barred.

The 40 year period may be curtailed in special

circumstances. A 19 year period was accepted by the

Court where the lands were a Commons (on appeal from

Registrar).

Nevertheless every case of title claimed by long

possession will be considered on its merits. Such

applications are usually made by one member of a family

remaining on after the others have died or departed from

the lands. The facts should be fully set out in Form 5 as to

dates of death and of departure etc.

In Section 49 cases statements such as that the appli-

cant has become entitled by operation of the Statute of

Limitations have been criticised by High Court Judges.

They should not be accepted. It is for the applicant to

prove the facts and for the Examiner to decide whether on

the facts proved the title sought has been established. It is

in the discretion of the Examiner dealing with the

application whether notices may or may not be served

where it is sworn that a person has been out of the

property and long barred. Short social visits by those who

left are not enough to prevent the Statute running against

them. A son remaining on the death of the registered

owner has been held entitled although his wife worked the