Previous Page  132 / 264 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 132 / 264 Next Page
Page Background

GAZETTE

JULY

farm jointly with him. Where the application is for the

registration of the applicant as full owner of the whole or

part of a commonage it is usually difficult or impossible

where the persons entitled are too numerous for the

applicant to ascertain all their names and addresses or

those of their personal representatives or successors. If

they are not supplied, we would direct notice to be

published in a local paper circulating in the locality in

substitution for the service of notices.

We accept titles and register an applicant as full owner

notwithstanding the existence of an unproved Will of the

registered owner purporting to have devised the land to

the applicant or a predecessor in title of the applicant,

provided that the said Will does not purport to charge

legacies or rights on the land, or if any such legacies arise

they have been discharged or become spent or statute-

barred.

APPLICATIONS FOR REGISTRATION WHEN

DEEDS HAVE BEEN LOST OR DESTROYED

Registration may be effected where there is an affidavit

that exhibits and identifies a copy deed which clearly

shows that the original deed was duly executed, that the

parties subsequently acted on it according to its tenor and

that it has been lost or destroyed. Unless it shows clearly

that it was stamped the copy deed tendered must be

stamped as an original.

Formerly where a person entered into possession of

land in the capacity of a bailiff the old doctrine was "once

a bailiff always a bailiff'—but this is now abolished by

Section 124 of the Succession Act 1965 as regards a

person entering into possession of the estate of a deceased

person who died after the 1st January 1967.

Formerly a personal representative was regarded as an

express trustee of the registered freehold property of his

deceased and could not claim the benefit of the Statute.

This was continuously modified by the Courts until now

the personal representative is apparently in the same

position as any other person claiming title by possession.

From and after 1st January 1967 under Sections 126

and 127 of the Succession Act 1965 a person in

possession may acquire title by six years adverse

possession or, in the case of a disability, nine years. Again

this only applies in the case of the estates of persons dying

after 1st January 1967. Generally speaking a person

cannot normally be in adverse possession to his or her

spouse. There are circumstances where the possession of

a spouse may become adverse as for instance where a

husband deserts his wife who remains in possession.

Successive squatters can between them make up the

statutory period.

When it is claimed in an application that the title to

part of a Folio subject to a Land Commission prohibition

against sub-division had been acquired by possession it is

not necessary to obtain the consent of the Land

Commission if the title to the part was acquired prior to

the coming into operation of the Land Act 1975. After the

9th March 1965, Section 12 of the Land Act 1965 applies

and the consent of the Land Commission is necessary.

Where an applicant is a devisee under the will of a

registered owner and is also his personal representative

there is no adverse possession and an application under

Section 49 cannot be entertained.

Part 3 of the Rules — Dealings with Registered Property

Transfers, charge etc., should follow the forms prescribed

by the Rules. The execution of every application except

one by a solicitor and of every Instrument must be

attested: if by a blind or illiterate person it should be

verified by affidavit.

Where the transfer is executed by Attorney the power

of Attorney or office copy thereof filed in the High Court

must be produced. In cases outside the provisions of

Sections 8 and 9 of the Conveyancing Act 1882 evidence

must be produced that the grantor was alive at the date of

execution of the transfer and the power has not been

revoked.

Rule 56 prescribes the plan which is required when

there is a transfer of part. Unless the part is already

clearly defined on the Registry Map i.e. if it has a separate

Land Registry plan number it must be shown on the

current largest scale map published by the Ordnance

Survey (Land Registry Copy Maps are acceptable if on

the largest scale). This Rule repeats Rules going back to

1937 which prescribed the map required. To facilitate

applicants and solicitors and to expedite registration

maps have over the years been accepted when their effect

could be entered on the office sheets even where they did

not strictly come within the Rules. Increasing difficulties

in mapping with the proliferation of photocopiers,

boundary conflicts and other troubles forced the stricter

application of the Rule.

The covering statement which is to accompany every

application or Instrument lodged in the Registry is

prescribed by Rule 58. It may be in Form 17. It is

important that this form should be fully filled up. Very

often the names of all the parties are not given, or the

Land Certificate is not referred to. It should be stated for

whom the solicitor acts, whether for transferor or

transferee or chargeant, or for all the parties. In the case

of the Land Certificate it should be clearly stated to

whom it is to be returned and who has had custody of it.

Frequently, where the Land Certificate is in the custody

of a third party the consent to its use for a second

application or dealing is not lodged.

Valuation for compensation

is our business

Osborne King & Megran I

Dublin 760251

Cork 21371

Galway 65261

101