Previous Page  134 / 264 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 134 / 264 Next Page
Page Background

GAZETTE

JULY

compliance with its terms as entered in the register, and so

imposes on the applicant for registration the onus of

seeing that the registration he applies for complies with its

terms on which registration can be made: for, if it does

not, the registration is refused."

OTHER ENTRIES

Rule 147 deals with the notice of exemption of specified

property from former Crown Rent, Quick Rent, Ec-

clesiastical Tithes Rent Charge, etc. which may be entered

on the Folio and the proofs required for such entry. A

notice of exemption from tax under Section 68 of the

Capital Acquisitions Act of 1976, would appear to come

under the provisions of this Rule.

Agreements and covenants in deeds and leases which

give options to purchase are not registered as burdens but

may be protected by the entry of an Inhibition.

A Lis Pendens can only be registered when the suit in

question is one that affects the title to realty or to chattels

real.

Covenants and conditions relating to the use and

enjoyment of the lands are registered on lodgment of the

prescribed concurrence irrespective of any question of

whether they run with the land or not. It would be

complicated and time consuming for the Registry to

investigate each case. The difficulties of discharging are

set out in Section 69(3) of the Act.

Rules 148 to 150 and 151 deal with the notice of

conclusiveness of boundaries and the evidence which is

required before such a note may be entered on the Folio.

Before 1910 Folios sometimes had without justification

a stereotyped entry that the boundaries were conclusive.

This note is removed when any transaction occurs with

one of these Folios (now). Entry of note as to the

conclusiveness of the boundary is only to deal with the

exact line of the boundary. It is not intended to make

considerable changes in the respective areas and is never

intended to cover gross errors in maps.

LAND CERTIFICATES & CERTIFICATES OF

CHARGE

Part 4 of the Rules deals mainly with Land Certificates

and Certificates of Charge.

The Land Certificate is a certificate of title. It is

prima

facie

evidence of the facts appearing on it as of the date of

its issue. It is not the Land Certificate that is the owner's

proof of title but the Register itself. It is not evidence of the

title to the ownership of the burdens shown thereon.

Rule 162 sets out the cases in which the Land

Certificate must be produced on an application for the

registration of a dealing with the property whose

ownership it certifies. These include dealings by the

Registered Owner, with the consent of the Registered owner

and the personal representative of the Registered owner,

by way of transmission and transmission under a

settlement. Note that Judgment Mortgages are registered

without the production of the certificate. In particular

note that the Land Certificate is not produced in

applications under Section 49. It is always necessary to

examine the Folio or an up-to-date certified copy of the

Folio rather than to rely on the Land Certificate as to the

state of the Folio when dealing with the property.

A registered owner can create a lien on land by deposit

of the Land Certificate. The lien is an equitable charge

only and is subject to the equities that affect the registered

owner at the time of the deposit. The lien generally

attaches to a new Certificate issued when an old

certificate has been lost or destroyed. An applicant for

registration claiming to have acquired title by possession

under Section 49 of the Act does not need to produce the

Land Certificate or cause the Land Certificate to be

produced. An Order may be made under Section 105 for

the production of the Land Certificate for the registration

of any right existing at the time of the deposit against the

registered owner. The right, of course, must not be in

dispute. The deposit of Title Deeds by way of Equitable

Mortgage is of course subject to all pre-existing rights.

Where the Land Certificate is in the custody of some

person other than the applicant and the applicant requires

its production for the purpose of the registration of his

dealing and the person in whose custody it is will not

produce it for the registration, the applicant may apply

for an Order directing him to produce it. (Section 105(2)

of the Act.) If the person who has custody of the Land

Certificate claims that it was deposited with him by way

of Equitable Mortgage he has a right to hold it until the

execution of a charge in his favour; until then the

depositee is not compellable to produce it for any purpose

which would defeat his rights.

The Registrar may only make an Order for the

production of the Land Certificate under Section 105

where it is the registration of a dealing or charge which

can be effected without the consent of the person having

custody of the certificate.

If the depositee of the Land Certificate produces it for

a subsequent dealing for value his lien would be

postponed or destroyed on the registration of such a

dealing.

It would seem that the Registrar has no power to order

the production of a deposited Certificate for the

registration of any transaction for value.

For the purpose of an exchange of holdings by the

Land Commission the Registrar is given power under

Section 30 of the 1965 Land Act to order any person

having possession of the Land Certificate of the old

holding to deliver it to the Registrar of Titles; or if he

satisfies him that it has been lost or destroyed he may

dispense with production. Any claim of lien or other

claims on the old certificate will, from the date of the

registration, be transferred to the Land Certificate in

respect of the new holding. The priority of such claim or

claims will thus not be affected. The Land Certificate in

respect of the new holding will be issued to the person

who had possession of the old certificate.

The Land Certificate is a vital document which must be

produced to the Registry upon most dealings with

registered land. It follows that if it is lost or destroyed an

application to dispense with its production or to replace it

by the issue of a duplicate must be made when any of the

dealings referred to in Rule 162 is lodged.

Safeguards must be provided to prevent a possible

fraudulent double dealing by the Registered Owner.

The grounding affidavit in an application for a New

Land Certificate or for an order dispensing with its

production should give the facts about the loss of the cer-

tificate, the searches made for it and aver that it has not

been pledged as security, if such be the case, and include

an undertaking to lodge the original Land Certificate in

the Registry if subsequently found. The standard practice

is to exhibit in the Affidavit letters from the branch offices

of all banks in the neighbourhood of the applicant's

103