Previous Page  156 / 364 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 156 / 364 Next Page
Page Background

with the terms of the Act before any interest in the

property vests in him. This entails a special attendance

on the mortgagee as well as drawing up and preparation

of the appropriate certificate. The Booklet prepared by

the Council was unfortunately delayed by the printing

strike but even though it has appeared I must again

warm all practitioners to study the Act itself thoroughly

so that we can advise our clients in all detail.

LEGAL AID

The Minister for Justice made an Order bringing in

Legal Aid in criminal cases commencing on April 1st.

The Law Society made strenuous efforts to have what

we consider were proper fees fixed for work done by the

solicitor's profession under the Act. We failed in that

but despite this we felt we did not advise the profession

not to assist the scheme in so far as they could as a

social measure. It is time now to consider if the Scheme

is working or will work. District Justices in the course

of conversation have told me that it is seldom applied

for and I have heard of a case in which a successful

applicant for legal aid and a successful defendant to

boot came to the solicitor afterwards and asked what

fees he owed saying at the time that he, the defendant,

and a fair representative of public feeling knew what

fees were allowed and realised that they were hopelessly

inadequate. One might even risk saying that the public

do not avail of it because they feel that if they take legal

aid that their case cannot be properly presented for such

small fees and if a Solicitor takes on the case he will

not give it his whole-hearted attention. The public, are

completely wrong in the latter assumption. If a solicitor

has gone on

the

legal aid panel, every prospective

defendant can rest assured that he or she will get 100

per cent attention from that solicitor, who will regard it

as his absolute duty to give of his best. He has joined

the panel with open eyes and as a measure of public

spirit and he will

not,

I repeat

not

default in his duty.

This is merely an extension of the enormous amount of

unpaid service to the public by solicitors in every city,

town and village in Ireland. The image created at times

in the Press of solicitors being grabbers is utterly false.

Every solicitor in

the country meets cases where the

person consulting him cannot pay the usual fees and is

sometimes unable to pay the fees. Might I instance the

case of a poor widow who is forced to extract a Grant

of Probate or Administration because her deceased hus

band had over the minimum amount payable out of a

Bank or the Post Office Savings Bank without represen

tation being raised. In the case of intestacy, the solicitor

often has to arrange for a bond through an Insurance

Company and when this and the other outlay for Com

missioners fees and Court fees are paid, it is not easy to

charge the full and proper fees to a poor widow possibly

with no or hardly any means of support.

SUCCESSION

BILL

The first Succession Bill was one of the items which

caused the Council great concern for a long time. A

statement was prepared and issued to the Press shortly

after I took office. This statement was based on Society's

view on the social aspect of the bill and its possible

effects on family affairs. As you will see

from

the

Council's report other statements were prepared and

had the result of improving the Bill but not as entirely

as we had hoped. The Bill is before the Senate but I

doubt if they will be able effectively to alter the Bill as

passed by the Dail. The Report stage was started yester

day but reading the accounts of the earlier stages only

lead one to expect very minor changes.

The Commission on the Courts is sitting and a request

was made to the Council early in the Summer to indicate

its reactions and opinions on the suggested increase in

jurisdiction in the District and Circuit Courts. A special

committee dealt with this. This committee had before

them details of suggested

increases prepared by

the

Department of Justice. They were fully analysed and

the committee which was composed of the most expert

practitioners available for this class of work drew a

report which was submitted to the Commission. Broadly

speaking, the recommended jurisdiction of the District

Court was placed at £100 and the Circuit Court at

£1,500. A report in the newspapers earlier this month

suggested much higher figures but I feel they were too

high. If they were adopted, the recruitment of extra

judges and District Justices would have to be very large

if the work was

to be done. Even with the present

jurisdiction arrears in the Dublin Circuit are altogether

out of hand.

This report whether it was inspired officially or not I

cannot say did also suggest that the Minister for Justice

was anxious not so much that there should be a fusion

of the professions of barristers and solicitors but that

each should have the power to act as one or the other.

I cannot speak

for

the bar but as

a conservative

solicitor

so

called

in

the Article,

I am completely

opposed to the idea.

There may be nothing in

these

reports and I am led to this belief by the fact that the

Council has no official notice of any contemplated steps

or proposals nor have they been consulted in any way as

to their views on the matter. In this and in all matters

affecting the public first and second professional interests

I feel that we should be consulted on every conceivable

occasion.

The Minister and his predecessors cannot but

admit that over the years the Society has always sought

improvement in the lot of everybody and we feel that

we are the people who have the practical experience

to give such advice. Theoretical lawyers are all very

well but in any matter that comes down to real hard

facts, it is the practising lawyer of either branch of the

profession who is best equipped to give the final touch

to any question of importance.

Such contact and consultation did take place in con

nection with the new Criminal Justice Bill or rather its

objects. Time has been a bit too short to enable us to

comment in detail but we hope that the general tenor

of our recommendations has

to a

large extent been

followed.

To get back to the District and Circuit jurisdictions

if and when these changes are made, new costs rules

will have to be made to meet the changed circumstances.

This end of the matter will receive the most urgent and

active attention from the Council as we do not want a

repetition of what has happened in the past when all

applications were blocked or sidetracked with the result

that the new rules never came into being or took so

long to do so that the profession suffered to an unwar

ranted extent.

I said last May that the Council were taking an ever

increasing interest in the education of apprentices. This

is still true. The numbers entering into apprenticeship is

growing. Perhaps as I said before the qualification of a

solicitor is regarded as a step to other positions. It does

seem true very often. Our primary concern is to see that

the solicitor who practises is able to do so in the most

proficient way. Our lectures and instructions are geared