Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  22 / 199 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 22 / 199 Next Page
Page Background

B

ird

et al

.:

J

ournal of

AOAC I

nternational

V

ol

.

100, N

o

.

1, 2017 

83

The method was awarded PTM Certification No. 111501 on

November 3, 2015.

http://news.3m.com/press-release/3ms-next-

generation-molecular-detection-assay-listeria-receives-aoac-

ptm-validation.

The purpose of this collaborative study was to compare

the reproducibility of the 3M MDA 2–

Listeria

method to

U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), Food Safety and

Inspection Service (FSIS)

Microbiology Laboratory Guidebook

(MLG) Chapter 8.09 “Isolation and identification of

Listeria

monocytogenes

from red meat, poultry and egg products, and

environmental samples” (5) for deli turkey (125 g) and raw

chicken breast fillet (25 g).

Collaborative Study

Study Design

In this collaborative study, two matrixes, deli turkey and raw

chicken breast fillet, were evaluated. The matrixes were obtained

from a local retailer and screened for the presence of

Listeria

by

the USDA/FSIS MLG 8.09 reference method. The raw chicken

breast fillet was artificially contaminated with fresh unstressed

cells of

L. monocytogenes

[American Type Culture Collection

(ATCC) 7644] and the deli turkey was artificially contaminated

with heat-stressed cells (Table 1) of

L. monocytogenes

(ATCC

19115) at two inoculation levels: a high inoculation level of

approximately 2–5 CFU/test portion and a low inoculation level

of approximately 0.2–2 CFU/test portion. A set of uninoculated

control test portions (0 CFU/test portion) was also included.

Twelve replicate samples from each of the three inoculation

levels were analyzed by each method. Two sets of samples

(72 samples total) were sent to each laboratory for analysis by

3M MDA 2–

Listeria

and the USDA/FSIS MLG 8.09 reference

method due to the different sample enrichment procedures for

each method. Additionally, collaborators were sent a 60 g test

portion and instructed to conduct a total aerobic plate count

(APC) using 3M Petrifilm Rapid Aerobic Count Plate (AOAC

Official Method

2015.13

; 6) on the day the samples were received

for the purpose of determining the total aerobic microbial load.

A detailed collaborative study packet outlining all necessary

information related to the study—including media preparation,

test portion preparation, and documentation of results—was

sent to each collaborating laboratory prior to the initiation of

the study. A conference call was then conducted to discuss

the details of the collaborative study packet and answer any

questions from the participating laboratories.

Preparation of Inocula and Test Portions

The

Listeria

cultures used in this evaluation were propagated

onto tryptic soy agar (TSA) with 5% sheep blood agar from

a Q Laboratories frozen stock culture stored at –70°C. Each

organism was incubated for 24 ± 2 h at 35 ± 1°C. Isolated

colonies were picked to brain heart infusion broth, 10 mL,

and incubated for 18 ± 0.5 h at 35 ± 1°C. Raw chicken breast

fillet was inoculated in bulk using the fresh broth culture. Prior

to inoculation of the deli turkey, the culture suspension was

heat-stressed at 55 ± 1°C in a water bath for 15 ± 0.5 min to

obtain 50–80% injury, as determined by plating onto selective

modified Oxford agar (MOX) and nonselective TSAwith yeast.

The degree of injury was estimated as follows:



 ×

1

100

select

nonselect

n

n

where

n

select

= number of colonies on selective agar and

n

nonselect

= number of colonies on nonselective agar.Appropriate dilutions

of each culture were prepared in Butterfield’s phosphate diluent

based on previously established growth curves for both low

and high inoculation levels. Bulk portions of each matrix

were inoculated with the diluted liquid inoculum and mixed

thoroughly to ensure even distribution of microorganisms. The

inoculated raw chicken breast fillet was packaged into separate

30 g test portions in sterile Whirl-Pak bags and shipped to the

collaborators. For the analysis of the deli turkey, 25 g inoculated

test product were mixed with 100 g uninoculated test product to

prepare 125 g test portions that were packaged in sterile Whirl-

Pak bags and shipped to the collaborators.

To determine the level of

Listeria

in the matrixes, a five-

tube most probable number (MPN) was conducted by the

coordinating laboratory on the day of the initiation. To

determine the MPN for the deli turkey test portions, the

coordinating laboratory analyzed 5 × 250 and 5 × 65 g test

portions for each inoculation level. Test portions were enriched

using a 1:10 dilution scheme in University of Vermont medium

(UVM) and analyzed according to the USDA/FSIS MLG 8.09

reference method. Additionally, all test portions submitted by

the collaborating laboratories for low and high levels were

included in the MPN analysis. The MPN and 95% confidence

intervals were calculated using Least Cost Formulations, Ltd

MPN Calculator, Version 1.6, provided by the AOAC Research

Institute (7). For the raw chicken breast fillet, the MPN of the

high and low inoculated levels was determined by analyzing

5 × 50 g test portions, the reference method test portions from

the collaborating laboratories, and 5 × 10 g test portions.

Test Portion Distribution

All samples were labeled with a randomized, blind-coded,

three-digit number affixed to the sample container. Test portions

were shipped on a Thursday via overnight delivery according

to category B dangerous goods shipment regulations set forth

by the International Air Transportations Association. The

two matrixes were shipped consecutively, with collaborating

laboratories performing the analysis on one matrix at a time.

Table 1. Results of heat-stress injury

Matrix

Test organism

a

CFU/MOX

b

CFU/TSA

c

Degree of

injury

d

Deli

turkey

L. monocytogenes

,

ATCC 19115

9.1 × 10

8

2.5 × 10

9

60.8%

Raw

chicken

breast

fillet

L. monocytogenes

,

ATCC 7644

NA

e

NA Raw chicken

product is not

heat-treated, so

it was not

necessary to

injure the cells

a

 ATCC=American Type Culture Collection.

b

 Selective agar.

c

 Nonselective agar.

d

 Cultures were heat-stressed for 10 min at 55°C in a recirculating water

bath.

e

 NA=Not applicable.