Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  18 / 199 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 18 / 199 Next Page
Page Background

B

ird

et al

.:

J

ournal of

aoaC i

nternational

V

ol

.

99, n

o

.

4, 2016

995

Creamy Peanut Butter (25 g Test Portions)

Creamy peanut butter test portions were inoculated at a

low and high inoculum level and were analyzed (Table 4)

for the detection of

Salmonella

spp. Uninoculated controls

were included in each analysis. Laboratory 16 did not

participate in the evaluation of this matrix. Laboratories 5

and 11 received test portions but were unable to conduct the

analysis and therefore no data were submitted. Laboratory

7 reported deviations from the testing protocol in the heat

lysis step (incorrect temperature used). Laboratory 3 reported

contamination of its uninoculated control samples with the

inoculating strain. Due to this issue, the data submitted from

Laboratories 3 and 7 were not used in the statistical analysis.

All other laboratories submitted complete data for each

method. The MPN levels obtained for this test portion were

0.70 CFU/test portion (95% confidence interval, 0.55–0.89)

for the low level and 5.35 CFU/test portion (95% confidence

interval, 3.46–8.24) for the high level.

For the low inoculum level, 78 of 132 test portions (POD

CP

of 0.59) were reported as presumptive positive by the 3M MDA

2 –

Salmonella

method, with 76 test portions (POD

CC

of 0.58)

confirming positive. For samples that produced presumptive

positive results on the 3M MDA 2 –

Salmonella

method,

76 samples confirmed positive (POD

C

of 0.58). For test portions

evaluated by the FDA BAM reference method, 68 of 132 test

portions produced positive results. A dLPOD

C

value of 0.06

(95% confidence interval, −0.06 to 0.18) was obtained between

the candidate and reference method, indicating no statistically

significant difference between the two methods. A dLPOD

CP

value of 0.02 (95% confidence interval, −0.11 to 0.14) was

obtained between presumptive and confirmed results, indicating

no statistically significant difference between the presumptive

and confirmed results.

For the high inoculum level, 132 of 132 test portions (POD

CP

of 1.00) were reported as presumptive positive by the 3M MDA

2 –

Salmonella

method, with 132 test portions (POD

CC

of 1.00)

confirming positive. For samples that produced presumptive

positive results on the 3M MDA 2 –

Salmonella

method, 132

samples confirmed positive (POD

C

of 1.00). For test portions

evaluated by the FDA BAM reference method, 132 of 132 test

portions produced positive results. A dLPOD

C

value of 0.00

(95% confidence interval, −0.03 to 0.03) was obtained between

the candidate and reference method, indicating no statistically

significant difference between the two methods. A dLPOD

CP

value of 0.00 (95% confidence interval, −0.03 to 0.03) was

obtained between presumptive and confirmed results, indicating

no significant difference found between the presumptive and

confirmed results.

For the uninoculated controls, 2 of 132 samples (POD

CP

of

0.01) produced a presumptive positive result by the 3M MDA

2 –

Salmonella

method, with 0 test portions (POD

CC

of 0.00)

confirming positive. For samples that produced presumptive

positive results on the 3M MDA 2 –

Salmonella

method,

0 samples confirmed positive (POD

C

of 0.00). For test portions

evaluated by the FDA BAM reference method, 0 of 132 test

portions produced positive results. A dLPOD

C

value of 0.00

(95% confidence interval, −0.03 to 0.03) was obtained between

the candidate and reference method, indicating no statistical

significant difference between the two methods. A dLPOD

CP

value of 0.01 (95% confidence interval, −0.01 to 0.05) was

obtained between presumptive and confirmed results, indicating

no significant difference between the presumptive and confirmed

results. Detailed results of the POD statistical analysis are

presented in Table

2016.01D

and Figures 3 and 4.

Figure 2. dPOD values of candidate method versus reference method for 325 g raw ground beef (73%).