Previous Page  169 / 218 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 169 / 218 Next Page
Page Background

167

General discussion

processing signals about reward, cognition and action).

Combined, the experiments presented in this thesis confirm that striatal dopamine plays a

role in (motivated) cognitive control (

chapter 3

), and extend these findings by showing that

dopamine and the striatum are causally involved when information about rewards affects

cognitive goals (

chapter 4 and 6

). We also show that aberrant integration between reward

and cognitive control can surface in populations with deficits in cognitive control and striatal

dopamine signalling (

chapter 4 and 5

), suggesting that these cognitive deficits may stem from

deficits in translating information about potential rewards into cognitive goals. Dopamine

acts by changing the sensitivity of the neurons in the striatum, which is particularly sensitive

to input from the prefrontal cortex. We show that the prefrontal cortex modulates processing

in the striatum. We also show that signals about rewards in the reward-related corticostriatal

circuit are integrated with signals in the motor corticostriatal circuit when information about

reward, cognitive control and action control are integrated (

chapter 7

).

Which neural mechanism underlies the integration between reward and

cognitive control?

It is clear from the work in this thesis that the striatum and dopamine are crucial for motivated

cognitive control. It is also evident that top-down effects from the prefrontal cortex are

important for motivated cognitive control and that information from the anterior prefrontal

cortex during reward processing can affect processing in the motor part of the striatum (i.e. the

putamen). Anatomical evidence from non-human primates has revealed three ways in which

information can be transferred between circuits (

chapter 1 and 2

): Via direct cortico-cortical

(CC) connections, via cortico-striatal (CS) connections or via striato-nigral-striatal (SNS)

connections (

figure 1.1 and 2.1

) (Haber et al., 2000; Wood and Grafman, 2003; Haber and

Knutson, 2010). The work in this thesis clearly shows a role for the striatum during integration

of information across task-related goals (

chapter 4, 6, 7

), suggesting that information transfer

takes place at the level of the striatum. Although the work in this thesis strengthens the case for

a role for CS or SNS connections, it is important to realize that this does not rule out entirely

that the integration (also) takes place via CC connections. It may still be the case that the

striatum receives input from the cortex after signals have been integrated at the cortical level.

Given the results of the work presented here I would however speculate that the integration

takes place either by means of direct CS connections and/or by means of SNS connections. In

the first case (CS connections), the prefrontal input to the striatum is modulated by dopamine

(originating from the midbrain). In the case of SNS connections, dopaminergic connections

from the midbrain convey information to increasingly posterior/dorsolateral regions of the

striatum, which in turn project back to the midbrain (and the prefrontal cortex). The work

is

chapter 6

showed that lesions of the ventral striatum clearly affected motivated cognitive

control. This argues against a sole role for direct cortico-striatal connections, i.e. connections

from reward-related cortical regions to the cognitive striatum, bypassing the ventral striatum.