street was estopped from raising the argument that the
original resolution sanctioning the work was ultra vires.
The Notice served contained a notice informing the
Defendant of his Statutory Right of Appeal but he did
nothing. Mr. Smyth went also on to say that the De-
fendants were also bound by a letter received from
their Solicitors dated 8th April, 1970 in which they
stated that the expenditure on meeting the Fire Officer's
requirement would not be justified. I reject this portion
of his argument in the light of the decision in
Bord na
gCon v. Thomas Murphy,
Vol. 105 I.L.T.R., page 77,
as no evidence was given in it that the Solicitors acted
as Agents for the Defendants.
There is also an Irish case of the
County Council of
Cork and Sylvester O. Cotter v. Carde
(1963) Irish
Reports, 159 in which Mr. Justice Henchy held on
Appeal from the Circuit Court that the Defendants
who contended that a rate struck was bad on its face
because it did not comply with the statutory require-
ment in not describing the Defendants sufficiently were
estopped from raising this defence because they had
not appealed against the rate itself. In the light of this
decision and the Scottish decision and the fact that
Defendants did not appeal to the District Court as
they were entitled, from the requirements of the Notice
and that in fact they are now adopting a different
attitude to that adopted by them in their application
for an extension of time to appeal, I hold that they are
now estopped from denying that they are proprietors.
The definition of "Proprietor" has also to be dealt
with. I have searched in vain through the Public
Health Acts, Town Improvements Act and similar
legislation for a definition. Of course there is no defini-
tion of the word in the Fire Brigades Act. There are
definitions of Proprietors in the Small Dwellings Ac-
quisition Act, 1899, Section 10 (3) and in the Hotel
Proprietors Act, 1963 but in neither case do the defini-
tions help. I hope that the Legislature will see fit to
close this gap and define "Proprietor" in some future
piece of legislation. In the case of
Devlin v. Conion
(1920) quoted by Mr. Humphries the questions of whe-
ther a proprietor or occupier should be liable for illicit
distilling by a trespasser on lands and whether a pro-
prietor or occupier should be punished for the sins of
an unknown offender arose but in my opinion the
decision turned on the question of occupation or pro-
prietorship. Mr. Humphries went on to say that pro-
prietor means occupier. There is not a definition of
occupier in the Fire Brigades Act but I find that the
word is used in another Section of the Act which
relates to payment of fees to Fire Brigades acting out-
side their district—Sub-Section 2(a) of Section 4—so
the Act itself appears to distinguish between occupier
and proprietor.
In the absence of a definition in the Act I must
follow the natural, obvious and popular meaning of the
word. I must take the word in its ordinary sense. The
Concise Oxford Dictionary defines Proprietor as
Owner and on the evidence of Mr. O'Brien there is no
doubt but that the Defendants are the owners and
consequently I hold that the Defendants are Pro-
prietors within the meaning of the Fire Brigades Act,
1940.
Accordingly I am going to convict for a contraven-
tion of the Notice.
(Decision of Justice Delap given at Dun Laoghaire
District Court on 6th January, 1972.)
S.I. No. 47 of 1973
Solicitors Act 1954 (Apprenticeship and Education)
(Amendment) Regulations 1973 (S.I. No. 47, 1973)
The Incorporated Law Society of Ireland in exercise of
the powers conferred on them by Sections 4, 5 and 40
of the Solicitors Act 1954 hereby make the following
regulations.
(1) These Regulations may be cited as the Solicitors
Act 1954 (Apprenticeship and Education) (Amendment)
Regulations 1973 and shall be read together with the
Solicitors Act 1924 (Apprenticeship and Education)
Regulations 1955 (S.I. No. 217 of 1955) (hereinafter
called "the Principal Regulations) and subsequent
amending Regulations.
(2) These Regulations shall come into operation on
8th February 1973.
(3) Paragraph 10 of the Principal Regulations as
amended by the Solicitors Act 1954 (Apprenticeship
and Education) (Amendment) regulations 1969 (S.I.
No. 110 of 1969) is hereby deleted and the following
paragraph is substituted therefor.
(10) The subjects at the preliminary examination
shall be as follows :
Compulsory:
English, Mathematics and Latin.
Optional:
Any three subjects from History, Geog-
raphy, Greek, a modern language
(other than Irish)
approved by the Court of Examiners, Physics, Chem-
istry, Biology, Commerce (which is comprised of four
sections namely Economics, Business Organisation,
Accountancy and Economic History of which the
candidate will take one section only).
Signed on behalf of the Incorporated Law Society of
Ireland this 8th day of February 1973.
T HOMAS V . O ' CONNOR
(President).
TRUSTEE SECURITY
An account with the Dublin Savings Bank has Trustee Security under section 1 (J) (XII) of the Trustee Act 1893 as
amended and by the Trustee (Authorised Investments) Act 1958.
DUBLIN SAV I NGS B ANK - S a fe and Sound
Head Office: LOWER ABBEY STREET, DUBLIN 1. Telephone: 42607. Branches: THOMAS STREET, PHIBSBORO,
DUN LAOGHAIRE, RATMINES, BALLYFERMOT, FAIRVIEW.
91




