Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  57 / 88 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 57 / 88 Next Page
Page Background

Central Eastern Europe GRIP 2017 |

57

Figure 4.11:

Direction of gas flow considered at interconnection points at Polish borders under a

disruption via Belarus

Cross-border Entry/Exit capacity 2017 (EP_IN / XP_OUT)

Cross-border Entry/Exit capacity – planned 2018-2026 (EP_IN / XP_OUT)

UGS/Production Entry Capacity (S / P) – withdrawal

UGS Exit Capacity (S_X) – injection

Domestic Exit Capacity required for Demand (D_MAX / D_AS)

2017

2020

2025

Direction of gas flow:

CZ

SK

HU

SI

IT

PL

BG

HR

DE

AT

RO

GR

DK

2020

2021

2018

2019

2021

2020

2023

2018

2023

2020

2021

2024

2021

2019

2019

2019

2022

2020

2023

2019

Disrupted connection (BY)

Disrupted connection (BY)

Disrupted connection (BY)

LT

The analysis for the 2017, 2020, and 2025 summer periods did not identify any

problem with covering the average summer domestic demand and to meet the

injection requirements of underground storage facilities in the whole CEE region.