Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  318 / 354 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 318 / 354 Next Page
Page Background

A

Corporate and social responsibility report

Annex III -

Being an ethical and fair good player in business

318

Worldline

2016 Registration Document

Worldline

2016 Perimeter

2015 Perimeter

GRI code KPI Name

2016

2015 2014

employee

Per

revenue

Per

employee

Per

revenue

Per

AO11

Collaborative technologies development (Zero email)

Percentage of active Community users

27% 6% 11% 85% -

100% -

Percentage of Collaborative Communities

28% 50% 26% 85% -

100% -

Percentage of Dormant Communities

60% 27% 37% 85% -

100% -

Number of active users in Communities

1,800 474 825

85% -

100% -

communities

Total number of collaborative working

218 271 285

85% -

100% -

Number of Dormant communities

472 146 410

85% -

100% -

Total number of communities

787 539 1,113

85% -

100% -

Internal emails sent per week per mailbox

-

-

77

85% -

100% -

Exclusions:

AO16: On the Global absenteeism rate exclusion of Germany, Netherlands, India, Chile, Taiwan and Belgium;

GRI 404-3: Exclusion of Germany and Austria;

GRI 405-1: disabled people: exclusion United Kingdom.

not part of this year’s reporting.

Worldline’s scope of coverage has decreased from 100% to 85% because EquensWorldline employees have been included even though they are

*

Being an ethical and fair good player in business

A.4

Socioeconomic Compliance] and [GRI 419-1]

Ethical excellence withinWorldline

[GRI 205-2] [GRI 103-2

A.4.1

[GRI 205-3] and [GRI 419-1]

Compliance

[GRI 102-33] [GRI 102-34]

A.4.1.1

adhere to a number of requirements in the countries in which it

subcontractors of credit institutions, the Group is required to

and in particular to the activities of payment institutions and

controls and reporting rules.

operates, especially as pertains to its IT infrastructure, internal

In order to comply with regulations applicable to its business

is provided via a Group Services Agreement (along with other

Atos group’s Compliance team for all compliance matters, which

group. In particular, Worldline benefits from the assistance of the

to a large extent based on the program developed by the Atos

financial services, legal services, etc.).

acquisitions, internal control, human resources, innovation,

support function services, e.g. management, sales, mergers and

exposed countries) tend to be more and more demanding

In addition, national regulations and customers (including in

Worldline deployed an effective compliance program, which is

ensure efficient compliance. To reduce and prevent these risks,

regarding the compliance processes and procedures in place to

In 2016, any significant fines for non-compliance [GRI 419-1] and

Worldline.

any claims related to corruption [GRI 205-3] were reported for

Compliance governance

A.4.1.1.1

continued in 2016. It is also applicable to Worldline.

group Executive Committee and implemented in 2015; this

Improved compliance governance was approved by the Atos

This governance aims to achieve the three following objectives:

Worldline Chief Compliance Officer;

this program, which is under the responsibility of the

Chief Compliance Officer. Worldline is also entitled to lead

priorities of the Compliance program, as defined by the

Compliance Steering Committee focuses on strategies and

through the Group Compliance Steering Committee. The

An even stronger connection to the top management

Group Legal Compliance Team, and is led by the Atos group

cross-functional approach in the Operational Compliance

operational entities within Worldline and increased

A stronger involvement of operations through the different

focuses on cross-functional compliance actions;

Compliance Officer, the Operational Compliance Committee

Committee of the Atos group: Chaired by the Group Chief

their prominence, in order to improve the consistency of the

the GBU Compliance Committee meetings and maintain

year. The objective for 2017 is to maintain the frequency of

local Compliance Committees were launched the previous

up GBU Compliance Committees within local operations. All

Implementation of a global compliance approach by setting