Previous Page  99 / 462 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 99 / 462 Next Page
Page Background

GAZETTE

W B

MARCH 1992

by Eamonn G. Hall, Solicitor

The Future of Legal Practice

The future of legal practice was

considered at the Corporate Counsel

1991 Fall meeting of the New York

Bar State Association. Lawyers gazed

into their crystal balls, found some

elements of the future both murky

and mysterious on some trends, but

crystal clear on others. Mr.

John S.

Luckstone,

the Vice Chairperson of

the Corporate Counsel Section and

General Attorney of Bell

Communications Research, Inc.,

summarised the issues in the

newsletter of the Corporate Counsel

Section of the New York State Bar

Association in January, 1992.

The New York lawyers started with

the grim economic realities of the

present day - the decline in legal

business after the boom years of the

1980s. They confronted such matters

as the future size and structure of

law firms and legal departments, the

structure of the firms and the

relationship between inside and

outside lawyers, the relative

importance of the profit motive in

outside practice, the use of

paralegals and part-time

professionals, the litigious nature of

our society and possible legislative

backlashes to it and growth and

decline areas of legal practice. Many

of the issues discussed are relevant to

lawyers in Ireland.

The panellists agreed that there

would be belt-tightening both in

firms and in-house law departments.

Big firms would pull back, and there

would be a trend towards more small

"boutique" firms that would

specialise in particular areas of the

law such as computers and

environmental control. Corporate law

departments would remain at almost

their present size, and there would

still be substantial work given to

outside lawyers. The bigger law firms

would accelerate the "up-or-out"

process with associates, but there

would be more lifetime senior

associate positions offered.

Partnerships would be at two levels

- voting privileges with risk-taking

and non-voting with indemnification.

In law departments of corporate

undertakings, the focus of legal

practice may shift away from reactive

advice-giving towards more active

involvement in the planning of

business activities to prevent

incurring significant legal liability, to

be more helpful and to be part of

the management team.

The New York lawyers considered

that more and more law-school

graduates and admitted lawyers

would go into business positions; the

glut of lawyers would drive them in

this direction. Firms would continue

to expand their overseas practices,

probably through affiliations with

existing foreign firms.

There was likely to be even more

litigation as a result of the ever

increasing amount of governmental

regulation in an increasingly complex

society. The New York lawyers

considered that litigation would

increase - perhaps not in the tort

and malpractice areas where

legislative restraints may be imposed,

but certainly in the administrative

and regulatory arenas.

The panellists agreed that

environmental law compliance,

intellectual property associated with

computers and software systems,

health care and international

commercial transactions would be

growing areas of legal practice.

Unfriendly mergers and buy-outs

would diminish, but friendly mergers

and acquisitions may well increase.

Also the availability of rapid

telecommunications for voice, data

and video-conferencing would allow

law firms to practise successfully in

small towns across the country,

where costs were lower.

The lawyers concluded that the

boom years of rapid growth in law

firms and in-house legal departments

were over, but the need for legal

advice and work would remain

strong. Lawyers in the future would

be less detached legal oracles and

more involved participants in the

business decisions of their clients.

This may create a challenge to the

practising lawyer to maintain one's

professional objectivity and integrity,

but would provide exciting

opportunities for personal growth

and satisfaction in providing legal

services of high quality and value to

the client.

New Barristers' Complaints Body

The first meeting of the Barristers'

Professional Conduct Tribunal was

held on 30 January, 1992. The

Tribunal, which has lay members

nominated by the Federation of Irish

Employers and the Irish Congress of

Trade Unions, will deal with

complaints from the public, solicitors

and others concerning the

professional conduct of barristers.

The members of the Tribunal are

Diarmuib O'Donovan SC

(Chairman),

Gerard Dempsey

(FIE),

Kevin Duffy

(ICTU),

Peter KellySC,

Kevin Feeney

SC,

Harvey KennyBL

and

Peter Somers BL.

The setting up of this new Tribunal

follows the adoption of a new Code

of Conduct, Constitution and

Disciplinary Code by the Bar last

year. Where either party to a

complaint is dissatisfied with the

Tribunal's decision an appeal may be

made to an Appeals Board chaired

by the former President of the

Circuit Court, The Hon. Mr. Justice

Peter O'Malley.

79