Background Image
Previous Page  59 / 108 Next Page
Basic version Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 59 / 108 Next Page
Page Background

EuroWire – May 2009

57

technical article

of the cable’s attenuation and strain.

The Instron provided the load data, while

the extensometer provided the strain

data. Since the extra fibre length in this

cable was so insignificant, cable strain and

fibre strain were assumed to be the same.

A schematic of the test set up can be seen

in

Figure 9

.

The cable strain and fibre strain results

with corresponding attenuation readings

can be seen in

Figure 10

.

From the results it can be seen that there

is no large change in attenuation before

30 pounds. All fibre optic cable standards

require that the fibre sees strain no higher

than 60% of the fibre proof level while the

cable is at its maximum rated load. This

proof strain was derived from the study

of the reliability of fibre over a 20-year life

cycle, specifically the propagation of stress

cracks over this time period.

The Deep-Sea ROV cable was only

intended to perform for a short period of

time before it was decommissioned so,

because of the limited life cycle of this

cable, the acceptable load could be much

greater than the 60% fibre proof strain.

A load of 25 pounds appears to be an

acceptable choice.

5.1.4 Temperature cycle to failure

EN-187105 demands the lowest test

temperature at -45°C, while the GR-20

and ICEA-640 call for the highest test

temperature at +70°C.

It was decided to follow a modified

temperature cycle profile that would

cycle the cables to temperature extremes

to initiate cable failure. The temperature

cycle profile used in this test can be seen

in

Figure 11

.

GR-20 requires the most stringent

attenuation requirements for the average

attenuation increase of all of the fibres,

at 0.05dB/km. EN-187105 has the most

stringent requirement for attenuation

increase on an individual fibre, 0.1dB/km.

Testers settled on a modified requirement

that no individual fibre shall have an

attenuation increase greater than 0.1dB/km

and that the average attenuation increase

of all of the fibres shall not be greater

than 0.05dB/km. It was also decided

to follow the more stringent require-

ments of ICEA-640 and GR-20 while taking

attenuation measurements.

All attenuation measurements would be

measured at the temperature extremes and

compared with the baseline measurements

taken at ambient temperature prior to

testing. A schematic of the test set up can

be seen in

Figure 12

.

The results of this testing can be seen in

Figure 13

, where the temperature cycle

was represented on the X-axis and the

fluctuation in attenuation was represented

on the Y-axis. These values represented the

maximum attenuation change of a singular

fibre at every temperature extreme.

From these results it can seen that the

cable was more than capable of handling

large fluctuations in temperature. Even

though the cable is capable of -60°C, it will

most likely never see this temperature as

the sea water in which it operates freezes

at a temperature just below 0°C. The data

is represented in a tabular form in

Table 4

.

5.1.5 Hockle Test

This test was created to test the kink

resistance or hockle resistance of the

variations of the Deep-Sea ROV cable.

Hockling is defined as, “(of a rope) to have

the yarns spread and kinked through

twisting in use.” A benchmark was needed

to judge whether or not the process or

material changes in the design were

helping to improve the hockle effect

on the cable. The test set up included a

twisting bench and a fibre-measuring

device. The cable was strung through

the twisting bench and then connected to

the fibre testing equipment on either end,

as seen in

Figure 14

.

The distance between the crank and

the clamp were set to a predetermined

distance. With the distance set, the

cable was affixed to both the clamp and

the crank. The clamp was then moved

two-thirds of the distance back to the

crank. The crank handle was turned in

10 turn increments starting at 0. Once

twisted through a 10-turn cycle, the clamp

was returned to its designated position.

During the clamp’s return path the cable

would hockle and then remove itself from

a hockle. The fibre was tested following the

release of the hockle.

Figure 9

Figure 10

Figure 12

Figure 13

Figure 14

Figure 11

Pulling

equipment

Fibremeasuringequipment

Load

cell

Clamping

device

Clamping

device

Cablelengthundertest

Cycle

Temperature

Extremes (

°C

)

Delta Cold

(dB/km)

Delta Hot

(dB/km)

1

0/+40

-0.003

0.003

2

-10/+50

-0.002

0.011

3

-20/+60

-0.002

0.010

4

-30/+70

-0.005

0.010

5

-40/+80

-0.004

0.007

6

-50/+85

-0.003

0.005

7

-60/+90

0.043

N/A

Table

4

:

Temperature Cycle Test Results