Background Image
Previous Page  189 / 552 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 189 / 552 Next Page
Page Background

INFORMS Philadelphia – 2015

187

MB44

44-Room 103B, CC

Joint Session RMP/HAS: Health Care Pricing

Sponsor: Revenue Management and Pricing

Sponsored Session

Chair: Margret Bjarnadottir, Assistant Professor of Management Science

and Statistics, Robert H. Smith School of Business, University of

Maryland, 4324 Van Munching Hall, College Park, MD, 20742,

United States of America,

margret@rhsmith.umd.edu

Co-Chair: Wedad Elmaghraby, Associate Professor, University of

Maryland, University of Maryland, 4311 Van Munching Hall,

College Park, MD, 20742, United States of America,

welmaghr@rhsmith.umd.edu

1 - Drug Pricing for Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Distributing

through a Common PBM

Nan Yang, Assistant Professor, University of Washington at

St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, 63130, United States of America,

yangn@wustl.edu,

Yixuan Xiao, Panos Kouvelis

We model the competition among branded drug manufacturers on prices when

contracting with a common PBM, who manages the prescription drugs of all

manufacturers on behalf of their clients. We analyze the PBM’s optimal formulary

design problem and characterize the equilibrium pricing behavior of competing

drug manufacturers. We discuss the impact of various parameters on the

equilibrium outcomes for plan enrollees, PBM, and drug manufacturers.

2 - Bundle Payments vs. Fee-for-Service: Impact of Payment Scheme

on Performance

Elodie Adida, University of California at Riverside, Riverside, CA,

elodie.goodman@ucr.edu

, Hamed Mamani, Shima Nassiri

Healthcare payments in the US have been based on a fee-for-service scheme,

which provides incentives for high volume of care. The new healthcare legislation

tests Bundled Payments that remove such incentives. We analyze effects of

different payment schemes on the extent of patient selection and treatment

intensity decisions by a risk-averse provider. We benchmark performance on the

socially optimal outcome. We investigate modified payment systems that induce

this social optimum.

3 - Information Elicitation and Influenza Vaccine Production

Sameer Hasija, Assistant Professor, INSEAD, 1 Ayer Rajah

Avenue, Grange Heights, Singapore, Singapore,

Sameer.Hasija@insead.edu,

Javad Nasiry, Stephen Chick

We explore the procurement of influenza vaccines by a government whose

objective is to minimize the expected social costs (including vaccine, vaccine

administration, and influenza treatment costs) when a for-profit vaccine supplier

has production yield uncertainty, private information about its productivity

(adverse selection) and potentially unverifiable production effort (moral hazard).

MB45

45-Room 103C, CC

Dynamic Pricing: Learning, Personalization,

Equilibrium, and Consumer Benefit

Sponsor: Revenue Management and Pricing

Sponsored Session

Chair: Stefanus Jasin, Stephen M. Ross School of Business, University

of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States of America,

sjasin@umich.edu

1 - Dynamic Pricing and Learning with Online Retail Rankings

Arnoud Den Boer, Assistant Professor, University of Twente,

Gebouw Zilverling, kamer 4013, Drienerlolaan 5, Enschede, 7522

NB, Netherlands,

a.v.denboer@utwente.nl

, Bora Keskin

In online market environments such as Amazon or Google Shopping, firms

receive advertisement space if they satisfy certain conditions. It is beforehand not

clear if the benefits of this increased exposure outweigh the potential costs. We

investigate this question in a dynamic pricing-and-learning setting.

.

2 - Personalized Assortment Planning with Finite Inventory and

Demand Uncertainty

David Simchi-levi, Professor, Massachusetts Institute of

Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA, 02139,

United States of America,

dslevi@mit.edu

, Clark Pixton

Motivated by the trend among consumers of smartphone usage for shopping

online, we develop an algorithm for personalized assortment optimization over a

finite horizon with finite inventory, in the case where customer choice

parameters are not known. The algorithm simultaneously balances short term

revenues, marginal cost of inventory, and exploration to achieve good

performance in terms of regret.

3 - Stochastic Market Equilibrium for RM

Florin Ciocan, INSEAD, Boulevard de Constance 77305,

Fontainebleu, France,

florin.ciocan@insead.edu

, Vahab Mirrokni,

Mohammadhossein Bateni, Yiwei Chen

We present a dynamic pricing scheme for a seller who is allocating a volatile

stream of goods to a set of budgeted buyers. Our prices are computed as a

stochastic market equilibrium. We provide performance guarantees both in terms

of revenues for the seller and in terms of fairness for the buyers. We apply our

scheme to online ad allocation and using a dataset from a large ad network we

empirically compare the performance of out scheme with the second price ad

auction which is currently run.

4 - Do Consumers Benefit from Dynamic Pricing?

Guillermo Gallego, Columbia University, 820 CEPSR,

530 West 120th Street, MC 470, New York, NY, 10027, United

States of America,

gmg2@columbia.edu

, Ningyuan Chen

Inuitively, the seller benefits from dynamic pricing by extracting more of the

consumers’ surplus. Is this right? We start by looking at simpler questions: Do

consumers prefer random prices? Is the consumer surplus a decreasing convex

function of price? Is the optimal price an increasing concave function of cost? If

true, is dynamic pricing better than optimal fixed pricing for consumers? We

show that the answer to these questions are positive most of the time, but there

are some exceptions.

MB46

46-Room 104A, CC

The Economics and Operation of Vehicle Sharing

Sponsor: Manufacturing & Service Oper Mgmt/Service Operations

Sponsored Session

Chair: Saif Benjaafar, Professor, University of Minnesota, 111 Church

Street SE, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, United States of America,

saif@umn.edu

Co-Chair: Guangwen Kong, University of Minnesota, 111 Church

Street SE, Minneapolis, MN, 55414, United States of America,

gkong@umn.edu

1 - Contracting with Overconfident Customers in Car Sharing

Guangwen Kong, University of Minnesota, 111 Church Street SE,

Minneapolis, MN, 55414, United States of America,

gkong@umn.edu

, Diwakar Gupta

Although the economic and environmental benefits of car-sharing services are

well documented, many potential customers are reluctant to utilize such services.

This has been attributed to, in part, the lack of flexibility of short-term rental

contracts. We study potential impact of customers’ overconfidence when making

reservations, and design the contracts that incorporate customers’ bounded

rationality.

2 - Inventory Rebalancing in Vehicle Sharing Networks

Saif Benjaafar, Professor, University of Minnesota, 111 Church

Street SE, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, United States of America,

saif@umn.edu,

Xiaobo Li, Xiang Li

We study the problem of inventory rebalancing in vehicle sharing networks. We

characterize the structure of an optimal policy.

3 - Dynamic Service Management of One-way Car Sharing Systems

Ho-Yin Mak, University of Oxford, Saod Business School, Park

End Street, Oxford, United Kingdom,

makho06@gmail.com

,

Guangrui Ma

One-way car sharing services (e.g., Car2go) are gaining popularity. The key

operational challenge is unbalanced flow of vehicles within the service region, as

customers are allowed to return cars anywhere within the service region. We

investigate dynamic service blocking, i.e., restrictions of the set of return

locations, as a possible measure to counter imbalance. We formulate a model that

determines the blocking policy dynamically, incorporating customer destination

choice behavior.

MB46