Background Image
Previous Page  193 / 552 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 193 / 552 Next Page
Page Background

INFORMS Philadelphia – 2015

191

2 - Regenerator Location Problem in Flexible Optical Networks

Baris Yildiz, Bilkent University, Universiteler MAH., Ankara,

06800, Turkey,

baris.yildiz@bilkent.edu.tr

, Oya E. Karasan

We present the regenerator location problem in flexible optical network that

solves the regenerator placement, routing, bandwidth allocation and modulation

selection problems jointly. We propose a novel branch and price algorithm for this

challenging problem. Our results show that making routing, bandwidth

allocation, modulation selection and regenerator placement decisions in a joint

manner, it is possible to obtain drastic capacity enhancements with a limited

regeneration capability.

3 - Risk Based Facility Location by using Fault Tree Analysis in

Disaster Management

Ibrahim Akgun, Assoc. Prof., Abdullah Göl University,

Departmen of Industrial Engineering, Kayseri, 38080, Turkey,

ibrahim.akgun@agu.edu.tr

We develop an optimization model that minimizes the risk that a disaster-prone

area may be exposed to because it is not supported by facilities located for

prepositioning supplies. The risk is calculated as the multiplication of threat,

vulnerability of the area, and consequence. The vulnerability is computed by

using fault tree analysis and incorporated into the optimization model

innovatively. The resulting non-linear integer program is linearized and solved as

a linear integer program.

4 - Service System Design with Economies-of-scale and Congestion

Samir Elhedhli, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue,

Waterloo, Canada,

elhedhli@uwaterloo.ca

We formulate and provide solution methodologies for the service system design

problem with immobile servers, stochastic demand, and capacity economies of

scale. We start by reformulating the problem, and then provide solution

approaches based on piecewise linearization, Second Order Cone Programming

(SOCP), and Lagrangian Relaxation. Numerical results are provided

MB57

57-Room 109B, CC

Optimization of Power Systems Planning and

Operation

Sponsor: ENRE – Energy I – Electricity

Sponsored Session

Chair: Miguel Anjos, Polytechnique Montreal, Mathematics and

Industrial Engineering, Montreal, Canada,

miguel-f.anjos@polymtl.ca

1 - Chance-constrained Generation Expansion Planning

Incorporating Bus Sensitivities

William Rosehart, Schulich School of Engineering, University of

Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada,

rosehart@ucalgary.ca

,

Monishaa Manick, Miguel Anjos

A Generation Expansion Planning problem with load uncertainty is formulated

based on joint chance-constrained programming. Sensitivities are used to allow

greater emphasis to be placed on regions with high demand relative to

generation, and similarly to allow for lesser emphasis on regions that are

generation-rich. Numerical results are presented for IEEE test systems.

2 - Interrelationship Between Power Transmission and Storage

Elements of the Power Network

Enzo Sauma, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile,

Santiago, Chile,

esauma@ing.puc.cl

, Carlos Bustos, David Pozo,

Javier Contreras, Sebastian De La Torre, Jose Aguado

We study the interrelationship between the construction of new power

transmission lines to integrate wind farms and the installation of new power-

storage elements in the network. In particular, we analyze the effect of adding

new power-storage components into the power system over the optimal

transmission expansion plan. We illustrate our analysis using a stylized version of

the Chilean main power system (Sistema Interconectado Central).

3 - Bilateral Contract Optimization in Power Markets

Miguel Anjos, Polytechnique Montreal, Mathematics and

Industrial Engineering, Montreal, Canada,

miguel-f.anjos@polymtl.ca

, François Gilbert, Patrice Marcotte,

Gilles Savard

We consider an energy broker linking its customers and the power grid through a

two-sided portfolio of bilateral contracts. The contracts cover a number of actions

taken by the customers on request within specified periods. Managing this

portfolio raises a number of modelling and computational issues due to the

aggregation of disparate resources. We propose an innovative algorithmic

framework that models short-term decisions factoring in long-term information

obtained from a separate model.

MB58

58-Room 110A, CC

Analytics in the Petrochemical and Petroleum

Industries II

Sponsor: ENRE – Natural Resources II – Petrochemicals

and Petroleum

Sponsored Session

Chair: Tejinder Singh, Sr. Research Scientist, Delaware Research and

Technology Center - Houston, TX,

tejinder.singh@airliquide.com

1 - A Simulation and Optimization Framework for Petroleum

Refinery Operations

Ariel Uribe, Ecopetrol S.A., Km 7 Via Piedecuesta, Piedecuesta,

Colombia,

ariel.uribe@ecopetrol.com.co

, Sandra Montagut,

Omar Guerra

In this work we present a framework for the simulation and optimization of

petroleum refinery operations at strategic and tactic decision levels. Concerning

the adequate modeling of processing units, the developed framework allows for

the integration of economic models with both linear and non-linear empirical

process models based on historical data, rigorous process simulators, or pilot plant

data using scale up techniques.

2 - Long-term Demand Forecasting in Industrial Gas Markets

Bin Yu, Air Liquide, 200 GBC Dr, Newark, DE, 19702,

United States of America,

bin.yu@airliquide.com,

Adel Basli,

Gildas Bonnier, Athanasios Kontopoulos, Brian Besancon

In this talk we will focus on long-term demand forecasting of liquid oxygen and

liquid nitrogen in the U.S. in 5-10 years. We analyzed the predictive performance

of several forecasting techniques for IP in each sector using the employment and

GDP as leading and associated variables. Moreover, we developed the method of

decomposing the demand from the national level to local markets and identified

the sectors that drive or restrain market growth in each local market.

3 - A Multi-period MINLP Model for Long-term, Quality-sensitive

Shale Gas Development

Markus G. Drouven, Carnegie Mellon University, 5000 Forbes

Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, United States of America,

mdrouven@cmu.edu

, Ignacio E. Grossmann

In this work we address the long-term shale gas development problem which

involves determining the optimal development strategy for drilling and fracturing

gas wells, and designing a pipeline gathering infrastructure. The problem is

formulated as a large-scale nonconvex MINLP involving concave investment costs

and bilinear terms in the flow balances. We present a solution strategy that relies

on an MILP approximation coupled with a restricted MINLP, which yields near

optimal global solutions.

MB59

59-Room 110B, CC

Panel Discussion: The Impact of the Value-Based

Approach on the Field of Strategy

Cluster: Strategy Science

Invited Session

Chair: Nicolaj Siggelkow, University of Pennsylvania, 2000 SHDH,

Philadelphia, PA, 19104, United States of America,

siggelkow@wharton.upenn.edu

1 - The Impact of the Value-Based Approach on the Field of Strategy

Moderator:Michael Ryall, University of Toronto, Rotman School,

Toronto, ON, Canada,

m.ryall.@mikeryall.com,

Panelists:

Peter Zemsky, Tomasz Obloj, Harborne Stuart

Value-based strategy provides an intuitive, economic theory for business strategy.

An immediate benefit is that it provides a coherent alternative to ad-hoc

frameworks, and, in the process, it makes explicit the fact that profits are typically

part of some larger economic pie. More broadly, by providing a theory for the

economic aspect of strategy, it allows strategy research to focus on some of the

richer issues in strategy, including, for example, organizational design, leadership,

and execution. The discussion will also consider the empirical questions that arise

from the general value capture model (i.e., bi-form games applied in the context

of strategy). The mathematics indicate novel issues for empirical investigation. For

example, whether the distinction between “competitive” vs “persuasive”

resources is meaningful (as the model suggests it should be) and, if so, in which

real-world settings one type is more efficacious than the other for superior

returns.

MB59