INFORMS Philadelphia – 2015
348
TD06
06-Room 306, Marriott
Quantitative Finance and Risk Management
Sponsor: Financial Services
Sponsored Session
Chair: Ning Cai, Associate Professor, Hong Kong University of Science
and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China,
ningcai@ust.hk1 - Pricing Asian Options under Markov Processes
Ning Cai, Associate Professor, Hong Kong University of Science
and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China,
ningcai@ust.hkWe derive analytical approximations to both continuous and discrete Asian option
prices under general Markov processes. Numerical results illustrate that our
pricing methods are accurate and fast under diffusion models, jump diffusion
models, and pure jump models.
2 - Transform Methods for Default Timing Problems
Alex Shkolnik, University of California, Berkeley, CA,
United States of America,
ads2@berkeley.edu,Kay Giesecke
Reduced-form models of name-by-name default timing are widely used to
measure portfolio credit risk. Combinatorial aspects of many default timing
problems render them NP-complete. Nevertheless, well designed transform
methods do yield efficient algorithms. We illustrate such an algorithm on an
application of CDO pricing. The proposed method reduces computational
complexity by orders of magnitude over those encountered in the literature.
A complete error analysis is provided.
3 - Closed-Form Valuation of Barrier Options
Haohong Lin, Department of Industrial Engineering and Logistics
Management, HKUST, Hong Kong, Hong Kong - PRC,
hlinaa@ust.hk, Ning Cai
We study the pricing problem of barrier options that are among the most popular
exotic options in the financial market and derive closed-form pricing formulas
under some option pricing models. Numerical results suggest that our pricing
method is accurate and efficient.
4 - Does the Prohibition of Trade-throughs Hurt
Liquidity Demanders?
Ningyuan Chen, Columbia University, S. W. Mudd 321, 500 W
120th Street, New York, NY, 10027, United States of America,
nc2462@columbia.edu,Steven Kou
We study the impact of prohibiting trade-throughs on liquidity demanders. We
find that after trade-throughs are prohibited, the transactions of a liquidity
demander might have higher execution cost and effective spread. However, the
additional cost is insignificant for small trades and stocks with abundant liquidity
provision. Our results favor the enforcement of the Order Protection Rule, as the
cost it incurs on liquidity demanders may be outweighed by its benefit.
TD07
07-Room 307, Marriott
Topics in Optimal Investment
Cluster: Risk Management
Invited Session
Chair: Mykhaylo Shkolnikov, Princeton University, ORFE, Princeton,
NJ, 08540, United States of America,
mshkolni@gmail.com1 - Arbitrage-free Valuation and Hedging of XVA
Maxim Bichuch, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD,
United States of America,
mbichuch@jhu.edu,Agostino Capponi,
Stephan Sturm
We introduce a framework for computing the Total Valuation Adjustment (XVA)
of an European claim accounting for funding costs, counterparty risk, and
collateral mitigation. We derive the nonlinear BSDEs associated with the
replicating portfolios of long and short positions, and define the buyer and seller’s
XVAs. When borrowing and lending rates coincide we provide a fully explicit
expression for the XVA. When they differ, we derive the semi-linear PDEs, and
conduct a numerical analysis.
2 - Rationalizing Behavioral Portfolio Choice
Stephan Sturm, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA,
United States of America,
ssturm@wpi.edu, Carole Bernard
Classical portfolio optimization theory postulates that investors’ preferences are
rational and the optimization criterion is expected utility, for some increasing and
concave utility function. This contrasts with with empirical finding of cognitive
psychology. In this talk we try to answer the question if a given behavioral
portfolio choice in a general incomplete semimartingale market can be replicated
in the rational expected utility framework.
3 - Sequential Monte Carlo with Parameter Learning for
Long-memory Processes
Konstantinos Spiliopoulos, Assistant Professor, Boston University,
Department of Mathematics and Statistics, 111 Cummington
Mall, Boston, MA, 02215, United States of America,
kspiliop@math.bu.eduWe consider state-space models specified up to an unknown vector of parameters
and in which the unobserved state process exhibits long-memory. We estimate
both the state process and the parameter vector and propose a sequential Monte
Carlo method that is based on smoothing of the sample points of model
parameters. We establish a central limit theorem for the state and parameter filter.
We apply the approach to S&P 500 data in the context of a stochastic volatility
model with long memory.
4 - Leveraged ETF Portfolios with Delta-vega Control
Zheng Wang, Columbia University, 116th Street, New York, NY,
10027, United States of America,
zw2192@columbia.edu,
Tim Leung
We analyze a collection of static portfolio strategies that allow an investor to
control portfolio sensitivity with respect to the short-term return and realized
volatility of a reference asset. This is done by choosing appropriate weights of
each constituent in a portfolio of leveraged ETFs. We backtest our proposed
strategies using empirical data of major equity leveraged ETFs and illustrate the
efficacy of our methodology.
TD08
08-Room 308, Marriott
Tutorial in Financial Services
Sponsor: Financial Services
Sponsored Session
Chair: Bo Zhang, IBM Research, 1101 Kitchawan Road, Route 134,
Yorktown Heights, NY, 10594, United States of America,
zhangbo@us.ibm.com1 - Reduced Form and Structural Models in Energy Finance
Stathis Tompaidis, Professor, University of Texas at Austin, Office
of Financial Research, Austin, TX, 78712, United States of
America,
Stathis.Tompaidis@mccombs.utexas.eduWe present both reduced form and structural models used in Energy Finance. The
models span the oil, gasoline, refinery, natural gas, and electricity markets, and
can be used to value generators, oil and natural gas fields, and electricity
generators.
TD09
09-Room 309, Marriott
Collaborative R&D
Sponsor: Technology, Innovation Management & Entrepreneurship
Sponsored Session
Chair: Niyazi Taneri, SUTD, 8 Somapah Rd, Singapore, Singapore,
niyazitaneri@sutd.edu.sg1 - Incentivizing External Experts in New Product Development
Shantanu Bhattacharya, Singapore Management University,
Lee Kong Chain School of Business, Grange Heights, Singapore,
238145, Singapore,
shantanub@smu.edu.sg, Sameer Hasija
We create a model of new product development where information on external
factors like market potential and technology feasibility is sought from external
experts. The firm has to adequately incentivize these experts to truthfully reveal
their judgment. Contracts are presented to alleviate the resulting adverse selection
problem.
2 - Supplier Incentives in Collaborative Product Development with
Internal Competition
Timofey Shalpegin, Lecturer, University of Auckland, 12 Grafton
Road, Auckland, 1010, New Zealand,
t.shalpegin@auckland.ac.nzInternal competition in new product development has a profound, yet
unexplored effect on the incentives of the suppliers involved in a development
project through collaboration with the manufacturer’s competing development
teams. We study the optimal assignment of development teams to different
suppliers. We find that due to the effect of competition on supplier incentives, the
manufacturer may find it optimal to allocate more development teams to a
supplier with lower capabilities.
TD06