Background Image
Previous Page  41 / 552 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 41 / 552 Next Page
Page Background

INFORMS Philadelphia – 2015

39

SA08

SA06

06-Room 306, Marriott

Financial Engineering

Sponsor: Financial Services

Sponsored Session

Chair: Abel Cadenillas, Professor, University of Alberta, Department of

Mathematical Sciences, Central Academic Building 632, Edmonton,

AB, T6G2G1, Canada,

abel@ualberta.ca

1 - Robust Dynamic Optimization of Credit Portfolios

Agostino Capponi, Columbia, Mudd 313, New York, NY, 10027,

United States of America,

ac3827@columbia.edu

We introduce a dynamic credit portfolio framework where optimal investment

strategies are robust against misspecifications of the reference credit model. We

provide an explicit characterization of the optimal robust bond investment

strategy, in terms of default state dependent value functions associated with the

max-min robust optimization criterion. The value functions can be obtained as

the solutions of a recursive system of HJB differential equations.

2 - Optimal Investment and Liability Ratio Policies in a

Multidimensional Regime Switching Model

Abel Cadenillas, Professor, University of Alberta, Department of

Mathematical Sciences, Central Academic Building 632,

Edmonton, AB, T6G2G1, Canada,

abel@ualberta.ca

, Bin Zou

We consider an insurer who faces an external jump-diffusion risk that is

negatively correlated with the capital returns in a multidimensional regime

switching model. The insurer selects investment and liability ratio policies

continuously to maximize her/his expected utility of terminal wealth. We obtain

explicit solutions for optimal investment and liability ratio policies for logarithmic,

power, and exponential utility functions.

3 - Dynamic Programming in Mathematical Finance

Alain Bensoussan, Professor, The University of Texas at Dallas,

United States of America,

axb046100@utdallas.edu

Mathematical Finance has introduced new type of stochastic control problems. In

this context, the martingale method has been used to solve them. This gives the

impression that probabilistic techniques are the only way to obtain a solution. We

show that purely analytical techniques can be used for the same result. Not only

it is useful to have additional techniques, but also analytical techniques allow for

more constructive solutions. We will discuss the main techniques, and give

examples.

4 - A Data-driven Perspective on Transaction Costs in

Portfolio Selection

Victor Demiguel, Professor, London Business School, Regent’s

Park, London, United Kingdom,

avmiguel@london.edu

,

Alba V. Olivares-nadal

We show that a transaction cost term can result in portfolios that are robust with

respect to estimation error. Theoretically, we show that the problem with

transaction costs is equivalent to: a robust portfolio problem, a robust regression

problem, and a Bayesian portfolio problem. Empirically, we propose a data-driven

approach to portfolio selection with transaction costs. We demonstrate using five

empirical datasets that the proposed data-driven portfolios perform well out of

sample.

SA07

07-Room 307, Marriott

Quantitative Financial Risk Management

Cluster: Risk Management

Invited Session

Chair: Tim Leung, Professor, Columbia University, 116th Street, New

York, NY, 10027, United States of America,

tl2497@columbia.edu

1 - A Limit Order Book Model for Small-tick Stocks

Xinyun Chen, Stony Brook University, Math Tower, B148 #4,

New York, United States of America,

xinyun.chen@stonybrook.edu,

Jose Blanchet, Yanan Pei

We construct a limit order book model to inform the joint evolution of the spread

and the price processes for small-tick stocks. Under the multi-scale asymptotic

regime suggested by empirical observations, we solve the price return distribution

in terms of the order flow rates. We test our model using US stock market data.

Under different scaling regimes, with respect to the autocorrelation of order flows,

our results leads to different jump-diffusion models for the price dynamics.

2 - Optimal Static Quadratic Hedging

Tim Leung, Professor, Columbia University, 116th Street, New

York, NY, 10027, United States of America,

tl2497@columbia.edu

We propose a flexible framework for hedging European or path-dependent

derivatives by holding static positions in vanilla European calls, puts, bonds, and

forwards. A model-free expression is derived for the optimal static hedging

strategy that minimizes the expected squared hedging error subject to a cost

constraint. The versatility of our approach is illustrated through a series of

examples.

3 - The Martingale Extraction Method with Applications to Long-term

Cash Flows

Hyungbin Park, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, 100 Institute

Road, Worcester, MA, 01609, United States of America,

hpark@wpi.edu

The martingale extraction method is dicussed with applications. We determine

the exponential decay (or growth) rate of long-term cash flows and, as one of

examples, long-dated leveraged ETFs are analyzed. We then explore a sensitivity

analysis with respect to perturbations in the underlying process. The method of

Fournie is combined with the martingale extraction to analyze the sensitivity.

4 - Drawdown-Based Measures of Risk

Olympia Hadjiliadis, Professor, Brooklyn College and the

Graduate Center CUNY, 32 Willow Place, Apt. 3, Brooklyn, NY,

11201,

olympia.hadjiliadis@gmail.com

, Hongzhong Zhang,

Tim Leung, Chris Knaplund

Common risk measures, such as value-at-risk and conditional value-at-risk, are

based on the distribution of terminal returns, and do not incorporate path

dependence of returns. The drawdown process can be used to describe the path-

wise risk – it is defined as the difference between the running maximum and the

current position of a process. We define and discuss the risk measures drawdown-

at-risk, conditional drawdown-at-risk, maximum drawdown-at-risk and the

co-drawdown-at-risk.

SA08

08-Room 308, Marriott

Node Location, Node Disruption and Routing

Sponsor: Telecommunications

Sponsored Session

Chair: Timothy Matis, Professor, Texas Tech University, 2500 Broadway,

Texas, United States of America,

Timothy.Matis@ttu.edu

1 - A Robust Optimization Approach for Identifying Disruptive Nodes

in Networks

Joe Naoum-sawaya, IBM Research, Damastown Industrial Estate,

Dublin 15, Ireland,

jnaoumsa@uwaterloo.ca

,

Christoph Buchheim

The critical node selection problem (CNP) has important applications in

telecommunication, supply chain design, and disease propagation prevention. In

practice the weights on the connections are uncertain. Thus robust optimization

approaches have been considered. In this presentation, we address general

uncertainty sets and propose an exact approach based on Benders decomposition.

In particular, we can deal with discrete scenario based uncertainty, gamma

uncertainty, and ellipsoidal uncertainty.

2 - Location of Wireless Mobile Relays

David Shallcross, Applied Communication Sicneces, 150 Mt Airy

Road, Basking Ridge, NJ, 07920, United States of America,

dfs@jhu.edu

We consider the placement of wireless mobile relays to enable communication

between clients, focusing on minimizing the maximum link length in the

resulting network. We present new bounds and complexity results for the

centralized problem, and analysis of an algorithm distributed among the relays

themselves.

3 - A Game-Theoretic Model of Network Routing under

Strategic Link Disruptions

Mathieu Dahan, Master Student, Massachusetts Institute of

Technology, 70 Pacific Street #648C, Cambridge, MA, 02139,

United States of America,

mdahan@mit.edu

, Saurabh Amin

We consider a network security game where the defender routes flow through a

network and the attacker disrupts one or more links. The defender (resp.

attacker) faces disutility (resp. utility) of lost flow, and incurs transportation cost

(resp. cost of attack). We show that, under certain conditions, Nash equilibria of

this game can be characterized by max-flow and min-cut of the network. We

study equilibrium structure in terms of the player valuations of effective flow and

the incurred costs.