Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  446 / 1096 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 446 / 1096 Next Page
Page Background

S431

ESTRO 36

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

PO-0807 Practical advantages of a transmission

chamber in relative dosimetry of Brainlab conical

applicators

B. Tang

1

, J. Li

1

, S. Kang

1

, P. WANG

1

, L.C. Orlandini

1

1

Sichuan Cancer Hospital, Radiation Oncology, Chengdu,

China

Purpose or Objective

The commissioning of a radiosurgery unit requires the

acquisition of specific detectors able to characterize the

geometry and dosimetry of small fields. The acquisition of

the equipment for absolute dosimetry remains the priority

for the Hospitals, considering that relative measurements

can be performed without a reference chamber using long

acquisition time. The commissioning results therefore in a

tedious procedure. In this study, a new transmission

chamber (Stealth Chamber, IBA Dosimetry) was used as a

reference chamber (RC) in relative dosimetry of Brainlab

cone applicators. The timing of the practical procedure

and dosimetry results with and without the reference

chamber, will be analyzed and compared.

Material and Methods

IBA SFD3G diode detector was used to measure the 6MV

photon beam of a Varian Novalis used with Brainlab cone

applicators. Inline and crossline profiles at different

depths and central axis depths doses (PDDs) were

measured with a motorized water phantom (Blue

phantom, IBA Dosimetry) and OmniPro v7.4 software for

every cone. The measurements were acquired with the

transmission reference chamber positioned on the gantry

head in a continuous mode and without RC in a step by

step mode. The details of the acquisition parameters were

reported in Table 1. The total measurements time for each

procedure was registered.

Table 1 The Acquistion parameters with and without

stealth chamber

Acquisition

parameters/method

No

reference

Stealth

Chamber

Scan mode

step by step continuous

Scan speed

-

5 mm/s

In-scan positioning speed 5 mm/s

-

Positioning speed

10 mm/s

10 mm/s

Acquisition time

5 s

-

Stabilzation time

1 s

0.08 s

Results

Profiles at depth 10 cm for 4/15 mm diameter cones and

the depth doses acquired with the two procedures (Figure

1&Figure 2) shown a good agreement. The total

measurement time registered was 490 seconds for the

PDDs acquisition without RC and only 64 seconds when the

scan mode change from “step by step” to “continuous”

after stealth chamber was in place. The overall

measurement time for 4mm diameter was 575 s and 12 s

without and with RC respectively, 735 s and 17 s for the

15 mm diameter cone.

Figure 1

Figure 2

Conclusion

Traditionally, there is no way of applying a reference

detector when measuring small fields, especially for SRS

Brainlab conical collimators. The lack of reference signal

usually requires to acquire more signals in each measured

point to suppress the linac output fluctuation, which

results into a long measurement procedure. However, by

the introduction of stealth chamber,“continuous mode”

became available to us which substantially shorten the

measurement time while a good agreement between

measurements with and without stealth chamber for both

PDDs and Profiles was still reached. The use of stealth

chamber is a good solution to spare time during small field

dosimetry measurements. This aspect is important during

the commissioning of the stereotactic unit but it becomes

fundamental for the frequently quality control

performed.

PO-0808 Comparison of multi-institutional QA for

VMAT of Nasopharynx with simulated delivery errors

D.I. Thwaites

1

, E.M. Pogson

1

, S. Arumugam

2

, C.R.

Hansen

3

, M. Currie

4

, S. Blake

1

, N. Roberts

5

, M. Carolan

4

,

P. Vial

2

, J. Juresic

2

, C. Ochoa

2

, J. Yakobi

2

, A. Haman

2

, A.

Trtovac

2

, T. Al-Harthi

1

, L. Holloway

2

1

University of Sydney, Institute of Medical Physics-

School of Physics, Camperdown, Australia

2

Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Treatment Centres,

Medical Physics-Radiation Oncology, Liverpool, Australia

3

Odense University Hospital, Laboratory of Radiation

Physics, Odense, Denmark

4

Illawarra Cancer Care Centre, Medical Physics -

Radiation Oncology, Wollongong, Australia

5

University of Wollongong, Centre of Medical Radiation

Physics, Wollongong, Australia

Purpose or Objective

Quality assurance of individual treatment plans is often

performed using phantom measurement and analysing

acceptable delivery accuracy by gamma analysis with a

required pass rate. Simplifying a complex treatment plan

and measurement into a single number is

problematic. This study evaluates the sensitivity of