Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  770 / 1096 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 770 / 1096 Next Page
Page Background

S754

ESTRO 36

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

feasible therapeutic option. Adjuvant chemotherapy, in

selected patients, can improve survival.

EP-1410 Role of PMRT in Elderly Patients with T1-2

and 1 to 3 Positive Nodes Breast Cancer

L. Cao

1

, M.Y. Kirova

2

, C. Xu

1

, K.W. Shen

3

, J.Y. Chen

1

1

Ruijin Hospital- Shanghai Jiaotong University School of

Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai,

China

2

Institut Curie, Department of Radiation Oncology, Paris,

France

3

Ruijin Hospital- Shanghai Jiaotong University School of

Medicine, Comprehensive Breast Health Center,

Shanghai, China

Purpose or Objective

Even if evidence of post-mastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT)

in patients with T1-2 and 1 to 3 positive nodes breast

cancer is increasing, controversies still exist, especially in

elderly patients because the risk of treatment-related

toxicity. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy

and toxicity of PMRT in elderly as well as the place and

use of systemic treatment in this population of patients.

Material and Methods

We retrospectively reviewed records of consecutive

patients with T1-2 and 1 to 3 positive nodes treated with

mastectomy at our institution between June 2009 and

June 2014. Elderly patients were defined as 65 years or

above. Patients who had received neoadjuvant treatment

were excluded from the analysis. In total, we analyzed 73

patients, of them only 23 received PMRT. Locoregional

recurrence (LRR) was defined as any recurrence within the

ipsilateral chest wall, ipsilateral axillary, internal

mammary, infraclavicular or supraclavicular lymph nodes.

All recurrences at other sites were recorded as distant

disease recurrence (DDR). Disease-free survival (DFS) was

defined as the time from start of PMRT until recurrence of

tumor or death from any cause. Overall survival (OS) is

defined as the time from start of PMRT until death from

any cause.

Results

The median age was 72 years (range, 65-91 years). There

were 10 patients with HER2 positive tumors, of them100%

(n=4) received trastuzumab in the PMRT group and 2 of 6

patients in non-PMRT group. All patients with HR positive

tumor received endocrine therapy. The patients in the

PMRT group were younger (69 years vs. 75 years, P=0.005).

Higher number of patients in the PMRT group received

adjuvant chemotherapy (82.6 % vs 48 %, P=0.006). At a

median follow-up of 48 months (range, 25-85 months),

there were 2 LRR diagnosed concurrently with distant

metastasis, one in each group respectively. We observed

six distant metastases and 5 deaths. In the whole cohort,

the 5-year LRR, DDR, DFS and OS were respectively: 3.4%,

13.2%, 84.5% and 92.1%. In the PMRT group, the 5-year

LRR, DDR, DFS and OS were 4.5%, 14.1%, 85.9%, and 94.7%,

respectively. In the non-PMRT group, the 5-year LRR, DDR,

DFS and OS were 2.4%, 12.4%, 84.2% and 92.3%,

respectively. In these small single center series, there was

no difference in LRR, DDR, DFS and OS between the PMRT

and non-PMRT group. There was no significant impact of

comorbidity, T-stage, number of positive nodes, HR

status, HER2 status and adjuvant chemotherapy on the

effect of PMRT.

Conclusion

The benefit of PMRT might be limited in the unselected

elderly patients with T1-2 and 1 to 3 positive nodes. The

intensity of anti-cancer treatment including adjuvant

chemotherapy and PMRT tends to decrease in patients

with increased age at diagnosis. Larger study is needed to

identify elderly patients with relative higher risk of LRR

and metastasis, as well as the risk of toxicity to better

individualize treatment. Clear biomarkers are needed to

decide patients for whom radiotherapy can be avoided.

EP-1411 Chemo-IMRT in elderly head and neck cancer

patients

I. Ahmed

1

, S. Kotur

1

, D. Sahoo

2

, D. Sougumarane

3

, R.

Bhise

4

, K. Vinchurkar

5

, M. Kalloli

5

, A. Sanikoppa

6

1

Kle's belgaum cancer hospital, radiation oncology,

Belgaum, India

2

Kle's belgaum cancer hospital, radiaiton oncology,

Belgaum, India

3

kle's belgaum cancer hospital, radiation physics,

Belgaum, India

4

Kle's belgaum cancer hospital, medical oncology,

Belgaum, India

5

Kle's belgaum cancer hospital, surgical oncology,

Belgaum, India

6

Kle's belgaum cancer hospital, pathology, belgaum,India

Purpose or Objective

Elderly patients have been underrepresented in

prospective clinical trials that have defined standards of

care for head and neck cancer. In the era of improved

radiation techniques, improved systemic therapy and

better supportive care can claim that chemoradiation

does, in fact, improve survival for a large segment of this

population and should not be denied for fear of poor

tolerance.

Material and Methods

21 patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer

treated with SIB-IMRT and concurrent weekly cisplatin

were prospectively evaluated. After written and informed

consent, all patients were immobilised with head and neck

thermoplastic mask followed by CT simulation. Critical

structures and Planning Target volumes – high risk

receiving 70Gy (PTVHR), intermediate risk receiving 63 or

59.4 Gy (PTVIR) and low risk receiving 56 or 54Gy (PTVLR)

in 33-35 fractions over 6.5-7 weeks were defined and

planned with Eclipse version 11 planning system using 7-9

field arrangements. Concurrent Chemotherapy was

administered using weekly cisplatin 40mg/m2 or

carboplatin AUC 2 for 6 cycles. All patients were evaluated

for treatment compliance and radiation toxicities weekly.

Outcomes were analysed in terms of clinical response

evaluation using RECIST criteria, acute toxicities

according to RTOG-EORTC and overall survival using

Kaplan Meir curve.

Results

Median age of presentation was 69 years (range 65-76)

with M: F ratio of 16:5. Primary site of presentation were

hypopharynx (10), oropharynx (5) and larynx (6). TNM

stage status were T1(2),T2(5), T3(11), T4(3); N1(4), N2(1),

N3(1); Stage III(10), IVA(10) and IVB(1). All patients

received 70 Gy. Median Overall treatment time was 53

days (range 46-65 days) with treatment interruption of 1-

9 days (median 3 days). All patients received 4-6 cycles of

cisplatin/carboplatin (median 6). Acute toxicities are

shown in table. Mean weight loss was 8% (range 4-

15%).With a median follow up of 9 months (range 3-15

months), ORR were 71.5% (15 patients) had complete

response and 28.5% (6 patients) had partial response. 7

(33%) patients had recurrence with 6 loco regional and 1

distant, out of which 3 expired and 4 are alive with

disease. The overall 15 month survival rate is 75.6%.

GRADE

1

GRADE

2

GRADE

3

GRADE

4

MUCOSITIS

1(5%) 17(80%) 3(14%) 0

DERMATITIS

17(80%) 3(14%) 1(5%) 0

LARYNGITIS

8(38%) 13(62%) 0

0

ANAEMIA

6(28%) 0

0

0

NEUTROPENIA

4(19%) 0

2(10%) 0

THROMBOCYTOPENIA 1(5%) 1(5%) 0

0