Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  773 / 1096 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 773 / 1096 Next Page
Page Background

S757

ESTRO 36

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

circumstances. Psychosocial counselling however had the

largest evidentiary base for most of the outcomes.

Conclusion

Conclusion: To our knowledge this is the first evidence

based guideline to comprehensively evaluate

interventions to improve sexual problems in people with

cancer. The guideline will be a valuable resource to

support practitioners and clinics in addressing this

important aspect of being human.

EP-1416 A new model of care to improve clinical trial

participation in radiation oncology

M. Grand

1,2,3

, M. Berry

1,3,4

, D. Forstner

1,3,4

, S. Gillman

1,3

,

P. Phan

1,3

, K. Wong

1,4,5

, S. Vinod

1,4,6

1

Liverpool Hospital, Cancer Therapy Centre, Liverpool,

Australia

2

Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Clinical

Trials, Liverpool- NSW, Australia

3

Campbelltown Hospital, Cancer Therapy Centre,

Campbelltown- NSW, Australia

4

University of NSW, South Western Sydney Clinical

School, NSW, Australia

5

Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, CCORE,

Liverpool- NSW, Australia

6

Western Sydney University, Clinical School, NSW,

Australia

Purpose or Objective

Clinical trial participation is becoming increasingly

recognised as an indicator of quality of care in

oncology. Previously, Radiation Oncology (RO) clinical

trials at Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centres,

Sydney, Australia were managed by a general oncology

clinical trials unit. The focus was largely on

pharmaceutical and large collaborative group trials, and

less on investigator initiated studies. This model was

heavily reliant on individual clinicians remembering to

screen and recruit patients. Recognising our low rates of

participation in clinical trials, we decided to develop and

implement a new model of care to support clinical trials

in RO.

Material and Methods

A new team dedicated to RO clinical trials with specific

skill sets in nursing, radiation therapy and clinical

research, was formed in December 2014. Strategies

were devised to improve performance which included

development of standard operating procedures, Good

Clinical Practice (GCP) training, and active education and

communication. Work processes were changed to be less

reliant on clinicians, with more co-ordination by the RO

clinical trials team. Active screening was conducted

through attendance at multidisciplinary team meetings,

screening clinic lists and development of a MOSAIQ

screening tool for clinicians. The model involved regular

auditing and feedback to clinicians to identify poor

recruiters or poorly recruiting trials, and provide clinical

trials support to improve this.

Results

Across both Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy

Centres, screening activity increased from 51 patients

screened in 2014, to 339 in 2015, and to 487 up to August

2016. Participation in clinical trials, as a percentage of

new patients seen in RO clinics, increased from 2.6% in

2014, to 12.4% as of August 2016 (Fig 1). The number of

RO clinical trials that were open in 2014 was 20, and in

2016, it was 33. Among these studies, the number of

investigator initiated studies that were open in 2014 was

8, compared to 15 in 2016. In 2016, the MOSAIQ screening

assessment has been completed for 36.6% of new patients

across both sites. Completion of GCP certification by all

radiation oncology staff involved with clinical trials has

reached 100%. The quality of data submission has

improved through accurate collection of data at the

required time points.

Conclusion

This new model of care, tailored to the specific needs of

RO, has resulted in increased clinical trial screening and

participation. The RO clinical trials department has

become the chosen model of care across the local health

district.

Figure 1: Percentage of patients on clinical trials

EP-1417 Clinical evaluation of a fully automatic body

delineation algorithm for radiotherapy

T. Fechter

1,2

, J. Dolz

3

, U. Nestle

2,4

, D. Baltas

1,2

1

Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Medical Physics

- Department of Radiation Oncology, Freiburg, Germany

2

German Cancer Consortium DKTK, Partner Site Freiburg-

Germany, Freiburg, Germany

3

École de technologie supérieure, Laboratory for

Imagery- Vision and Artificial Intelligence, Montréal,

Canada

4

Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Department of

Radiation Oncology, Freiburg, Germany

Purpose or Objective

The aim of radiotherapy is to deliver the highest possible

dose to the tumour and spare surrounding healthy tissue.

For high efficacy an accurate delineation of the body

outline on planning CT is crucial. On the one hand for dose

calculation, on the other hand to reduce the delivered

dose to the skin. However, depending on the tumour and

treatment type, positioning markers, catheters, breathing

belt, fixation mattress, table and/or blankets are directly

adjacent to the patient’ skin. Algorithms currently

employed in clinical settings cannot often distinguish

those devices from the patient’s body. Consequently,

these devices are included in the body segmentation

which requires tedious manual corrections. In this work, a

fully automatic algorithm for body delineation that can

handle structures adjacent to the patient is clinically

evaluated for various cancer cases.

Material and Methods

The presented approach is based on a series of threshold

and morphology operations, and it was implement ed using

MITK platform. For evaluation purposes , segm entation

was performed on the planning CT of overall 30 patients:

10 lung cancer patients, 10 patients with a prostatic lesion

and 10 rectum carcinoma patients. CT scans were

acquired on different scanners and with different image

resolutions. Body delineations used for real treatment

planning served as reference contours. Similarity between

reference and generated contours was assessed by

computing the volume ratio (VR), Dice's coefficient (DC)

and Hausdorff distance (HD) to evaluate differences with

respect to volume, overlap and shape, respectively.

Results

The mean VR obtained was 0.99 with a standard deviation

(SD) of 0.006. The average amount of false ly classified