Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  800 / 1096 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 800 / 1096 Next Page
Page Background

S784

ESTRO 36

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

peer-review. Proposed key elements of the protocol are

the use of the NPL portable graphite calorimeter,

calibration in a composite field defined to cover what is

termed a Standard Test Volume (STV) of delivered dose

for scanned beams and calibration in a broad field spread-

out Bragg Peak to cover the STV for scattered beams.

Results

While for scattered beams the recommendations will be

largely in line with those already published, the key steps

for scanned beams are proposed to be as follows:

Step 1:

Derive the curve which defines the number of

particles per Monitor Unit (MU) for a range of incident

proton/ion energies. This is the Hartmann method and

utilises a plane-parallel ionization chamber at a shallow

depth in pristine Bragg peaks.

Step 2

: Input the curve above into the treatment planning

system (TPS) for the centre/treatment room and then use

the TPS to plan a prescribed dose to the STV in water and

deliver this treatment to the calorimeter with its core at

the centre of the STV.

Step 3:

Re-normalise the data obtained in step 1 if

necessary, to ensure that the calibration in terms of the

number or particles per MU results in the measured dose

to the STV.

Step 4.

Test against alternative STVs to quantify

uncertainties in the dose delivered.

In addition, ionisation chambers belonging to the clinical

centre will be cross-calibrated against the standard

calorimeter at the time of beam commissioning and at

regular intervals (to be defined) thereafter.

Conclusion

A proton and ion beam dosimetry protocol will be

developed which involves direct use of a primary standard

level calorimeter in clinical ion beams. This may provide

a model to be followed elsewhere, ultimately reducing

dose uncertainty for patient treatments worldwide.

The code is under development and due for completion at

the end of 2017. This will coincide with beam

commissioning at the UK centres during 2018. This poster

will describe the proposed methodology with the aim of

stimulating wider debate and comments on this approach.

EP-1468 Skin dose in radiotherapy: results of in vivo

measurements with gafchromic EBT3 films

A. Giuliano

1

, V. Ravaglia

2

1

Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare INFN, Pisa, Pisa,

Italy

2

San Luca Hospital, Medical Physics, Lucca, Italy

Purpose or Objective

Clinical side effects to skin are a major concern with

radiotherapy patients during the treatment of malignant

disease by radiation. As a consequence, it becomes

important to accurately determine the dose delivered to

a patient skin during radiotherapy owing to complications

that can arise. However, the Treatment Planning Systems

(TPS) do not accurately model skin dose. The aim of this

study is to report the results of surface dose

measurements performed during treatments in

tomotherapy, at Linac both with 3D-CRT (TPS Pinnacle)

and VMAT (TPS Monaco) and in Plesio-Röntgen therapy

using EBT3 Gafchromic films.

Material and Methods

In vivo measurements were performed with the

application of EBT3 film pieces of 2x2 cm

2

directly on the

skin of patients or in the inner side of thermoplastic mask,

if used during the treatment. The target sites included

head and neck (H&N), brain and sarcoma in tomotherapy;

breasts at Linac and skin tumors in Plesio-Röntgen

therapy. For each patient films were located in 1 to 3

reproducible points (see figure 1 and 2) and measurements

were repeated on average in three consecutive fractions.

EBT3 films were read with a flatbed scanner Epson

10000XL and images were analyzed using the red channel

calibration. In vivo dose evaluations were compared with

measurements performed on Cheese phantom both with

and without thermoplastic mask at Linac and in

Tomotherapy.

Results

A total of 117 film measurements were performed on 21

patients. The absolute value of the mean difference

between measured and TPS-calculated dose and its

standard deviation was 11.3% ± 6.5% for all treatments. A

mean absolute difference of 17.7% for Linac plans, 11.6%

in Tomotherapy and 4.6% in Plesio-Röntgen therapy were

achieved. Both at Linac and in Plesio-Röntgen therapy

there was not a clear trend of overestimation of the TPS

with respect to measurements. Instead in Tomotherapy

there was an underestimation of the TPS (-9.1%) for H&N

and brain treatments (in these case measurements were

performed with thermoplastic mask) and an

overestimation for the sarcoma (9.2%). This trend was

confirmed by the measurements made on the Cheese

phantom in Tomotherapy, where there was an

overestimation of the TPS without mask (28.6% vs -0.7%

with mask). Moreover, an improvement of the agreement

between EBT3 measurements and Pinnacle and

Tomotherapy dose estimation was shown in presence of

mask (28.6% to -0.7% in Tomotherapy and -20.7% to -16.3%

at Linac).

Conclusion

Gafchromic films are suitable detectors for skin dose

measurements in radiotherapy. In vivo surface dose

measurements with EBT3 are a useful tool for quality

assurance in radiotherapy, since the TPS does not give

accurate dose values in the first millimiters of skin.