Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  806 / 1096 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 806 / 1096 Next Page
Page Background

S790

ESTRO 36

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

Purpose or Objective

The aim of this study was to model a beam modulator

linear accelerator in Pinnacle v.14.0 treatment planning

system for intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery and

radiotherapy.

Material and Methods

Depth dose, beam profile and total scatter correction

factor data were collected for 6 MV photons of Elekta

Synergy Beam Modulator

TM

linear accelerator with 80

leaves each of 4 mm leaf pitch using unshielded IBA

stereotactic field diode for field sizes ranging from 0.8x0.8

cm

2

to 4x4 cm

2

and field sizes above 4x4 cm

2

up to 16x21

cm

2

using IBA CC04 pinpoint chamber. The measured data

were imported in to the photon physics module of Pinnacle

v.14.0 and physical accelerator head specific data such as

primary collimator, flattening filter, MLC were input in

addition to beam data measurements. The auto modeler

of Pinnacle TPS was iteratively used to adjust parameters

such as photon beam energy spectrum, Gaussian height

and width of the photon source that affect various regions

of the depth doses and beam profiles to match measured

data. Dose grids of 1 mm and 2.5 mm were used for beam

modelling of fields from 0.8x0.8 cm

2

up to an equivalent

square field of 6.7 cm

2

and above 6.7 cm

2

respectively. A

common photon energy spectrum did not prove sufficient

to achieve the required agreement between Pinnacle

calculated and measured depth doses and beam profiles

for the whole range of field sizes. This was overcome by a

split field model that employs field size specific beam

energy spectra, with higher relative weights of low energy

bins and lower relative weights of high energy bins for

small fields and vice-versa for field sizes larger than 6.7

cm

2

. The validity of the model was tested independently

using a Standard Imaging Exradin A26 chamber in LUCY

phantom for field sizes ranging from 0.8x0.8 cm

2

by

comparing calculated and measured absolute doses and

relative output factors.

Results

Optimization of photon beam energy spectrum specific to

small field sizes improved the agreement of depth doses

both in and beyond build-up region for the small fields.

Measured versus calculated absolute planned doses were

found to be within 1% for field sizes larger than 1.6x1.6

cm

2

and less than 2.5% for 0.8x0.8 cm

2

field. The

agreement between the measured and calculated relative

output factors were within 2% for field sizes larger than

1.6x1.6 cm

2

and less than 3.5% for 0.8x0.8 cm

2

fields.

Conclusion

A split field model was generated for the whole range of

field sizes of a beam modulator linear accelerator from

0.8x0.8 cm

2

to 16x21 cm

2

using field size dependent

photon beam energy spectra. The model was successfully

validated independently and was found have a good

agreement with measured doses and relative output

factors.

EP-1479 Gamma 3D analysis for VMAT treatments

using two detector arrays

E.M. Ambroa Rey

1

, D. Navarro Jiménez

1

, A. Ramirez

Muñoz

1

, R. Gómez Pardos

1

, D. Amat de los Angeles

1

, A.

Gibert Serrano

1

, A. López Muñoz

1

, M. Parcerisa Torné

1

,

M. Colomer Truyols

1

1

Consorci Sanitari de Terrassa, Medical Physics Unit-

Radiation Oncology Department, Terrassa, Spain

Purpose or Objective

The development of advanced radiation therapy

techniques, such as volumetric modulated arc therapy

(VMAT), requires a patient-specific pre-treatment quality

assurance (QA). Two-dimensional array detectors are

widely used for dose distribution verifications and the 3D

gamma index is one of the metrics which have been

extensively used for clinical routine patient specific QA.

The aim of this study is to evaluate the 3D gamma index

for different VMAT plans, such as head and neck (H&N) and

prostate, with the Octavius 4D system using two 2D-arrays

(PTW Octavius4D 1500 and PTW Octavius4D 729).